Constitutional Treaty: Presentation.
Chairman: The first item on the agenda is a discussion with Professor Richard Sinnott. On ++
Professor Richard Sinnott: Thank you very much, Chairman. My presentation will be more of an elaboration +++
Chairman: To assist those in the Visitors Gallery, could you colour-code the three charts +
Professor Sinnott: I apologise, I should have been more explicit. The two lines on the graph I am +++++
Deputy Quinn: On a point of clarification, does the maroon bar on the graph represent the +
Professor Sinnott: Yes. The maroon is the EU 25 average. The light blue section of the graph +
Deputy Quinn: Thank you.
Professor Sinnott: On the policy areas of immigration, accepting refugees and defence, Irish +++++++++
Chairman: We can come back to that. Members may have questions about the presentation, ++
Professor Sinnott: That is what I had in mind when I said I might be more able to explain the +
Chairman: Senator Ormonde’s point was that we cannot just do that, and I agree with +
Professor Sinnott: That is right. Political science does not have clear answers to this problem +++
Deputy Allen: Professor Sinnott said the challenge is to increase people’s knowledge of ++
Professor Sinnott: I have made a note of several of the interesting points the Deputy made. There +++
Chairman: You are saying, in effect, that it is entirely in our hands and the activity +
Professor Sinnott: Yes, definitely.
Deputy Quinn: I thank the professor for his presentation and the accompanying documentation. +
Professor Sinnott: It is a fair assessment.
Deputy Quinn: The professor has indicated in one of the charts that the better informed ++++
Professor Sinnott: It would. The evidence is fairly specific on that. In the second Nice ++
Senator McDowell: I carefully read the information about the two Nice referenda and the various +++
Professor Sinnott: If the question focuses on a general approval or a generally positive approach +++++
Senator Ormonde: I welcome Professor Sinnott and I have found the discussion stimulating. The +++
Professor Sinnott: Yes.
Senator Ormonde: That is interesting because I would have thought the “No” people +
Professor Sinnott: I want to clarify the last point which is somewhat technical. The increasing ++++
Senator Dardis: Does Professor Sinnott think that canvassing in by-elections is an efficient +
Professor Sinnott: No.
Senator Dardis: I want to revert to the question posed by Senators McDowell and Ormonde ++++
Deputy Allen: Or who is their Senator.
Senator Dardis: Particularly who their Senator is. I am not so sure it is a bad figure. ++
Professor Sinnott: That is another series of questions which, with the Chairman’s indulgence, +++++
Deputy Andrews: Listening to the last part of Professor Sinnott’s response, I wonder if ++
Professor Sinnott: I think the Deputy is right on the first point he makes which is the danger of +
Chairman: I wish to play devil’s advocate in respect of that matter. I understand +
Deputy Sexton: People in general are apathetic towards European politics. However, I am also ++
Professor Sinnott: I do not believe that such research has been carried out. The Deputy’s ++
Deputy Ó Snodaigh: This will probably be one of the longest constitutional referendum campaigns +++
Professor Sinnott: The Deputy is correct that, when pressed afterward, a substantial majority of +++
Deputy D. Wallace: Does Professor Sinnott accept the referendum will represent a consolidation of ++
Professor Sinnott: I concur with the Deputy on that issue, despite the devil’s advocacy by ++
Chairman: One of the most significant issues emerging from this meeting is members’ +
Deputy Quinn: I acknowledge the Chairman is playing devil’s advocate and is providing +
Professor Sinnott: The evidence on that is clear.
Deputy Quinn: This is scientific data similar to opinion polls and it is used to reach fair, +
Chairman: I am sorry Professor Sinnott cannot complete his presentation but he will have +
Professor Sinnott: I thank the committee. We are working on a basic presentation of the socio- +
Sitting suspended at 3.55 p.m. and resumed at 4 p.m. Human Rights in Zimbabwe: Presentation
|