O'Kelly, Seán T.Thursday, 23 February 1928 |
Dáil Éireann Debate
Page of 43
|
PUBLIC BUSINESS. - LOCAL GOVERNMENT (RATES ON SMALL DWELLINGS) BILL, 1928—SECOND STAGE.
I cannot agree with Deputy Corish, that the principle underlying this Bill is a good one. My own opinion, and I would have thought it would have been his too, is that the main principle underlying th...
PUBLIC BUSINESS. - DENTISTS BILL, 1928—RECOMMITTED—(RESUMED)—AMENDMENT 18).
Having listened to the debate with an unprejudiced mind, I must say I am deeply impressed with the arguments advanced by Deputy Tubridy and one or two other medical men who say that if the amendment i...
IN COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. - VOTE 20.—EXPENSES UNDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, THE ELECTORAL ACT, AND THE JURIES ACT.
Will this finish that item as far as all the county councils are concerned?
IN COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. - VOTE 26—LAW CHARGES.
I suppose, in a general way, it is not too much to expect that there might be a discrepancy, such as is set out here, under sub-heads D and F in any one year. However, out of a total estimate of £4,0...
That is all the expenses up to date. Well, that is a large sum. It is a big sum of money for people like us to throw away, as was, in my opinion, done. Not only was this money thrown away, but some...
Would the Minister tell us whether it is the policy of his Government to accept responsibility for the payment of these Dáil bonds in full, or whether a declaration made by President Cosgrave represen...
Did you ever read it?
The Minister for Finance said he had an idea that the case would end in the way it did. May I ask him why he did not provide for it in his Estimates if he expected such a bad beating? Question put. T...
| Last Updated: 16/05/2011 16:40:14 |
Page of 43
|