That is entirely false.
On a point of order, I think I am justified in asking Deputy Davin for an explanation when he refers to my conduct during the discussion on that occasion.
I think I am entitled to know what the Deputy means when he refers to my conduct.
Is the Deputy in order in making the innuendo he did? Ordinary courtesy would demand that he should give an explanation.
And I would refer you to another Official Report.
I presume if this Vote on Account is defeated we will have a state of national emergency declared by the Government. No doubt it would give rise to a state of national emergency from their point of v...
If you are there much longer it will be.
May I ask the Minister did he believe in December, 1925, when the Boundary Agreement was going through this House, what he suggests now, that we had not the slightest claim to these land annuities?
The one big nought then was a lie. The damn good bargain was a lie.