Davin, WilliamWednesday, 12 December 1934 |
Dáil Éireann Debate
Page of 43
|
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Evidence at Banking Commission.
Did that apply to the Bankers' Commission you set up?
In Committee on Finance. - Financial Motions. Resolution No. 1—Excise.
What about the profits made in Carlow?
On sugar beet.
In Committee on Finance. - Fruit and Vegetables Tribunal—Motion.
There is something wrong.
I welcome the proposal of the Minister to set up this tribunal because, unlike these long-winded commissions that sit for years and hardly ever submit a unanimous report, I think this is the best way ...
To say whether there should or not.
Tribunal, not commission.
They will have fuller powers as a tribunal.
And Deputy McGilligan will not disagree with that, I am sure.
Is there any organisation capable of selecting individuals to give evidence on behalf of the producers?
In Committee on Finance. - Imposition of Duties (Confirmation of Orders) (No. 2) Bill, 1934—Committee.
Blunt ones!
Adjournment Debate. - Londonderry and Lough Swilly Railway.
On Thursday last I addressed the following question to the Minister for Industry and Commerce:— To ask the Minister for Industry and Commerce if representations have been made to him by the Londonderr...
The Deputy will have an opportunity of saying something on this matter later. Sixty out of the 100 miles of this small railway, which runs throughout the county, was constructed under the Railways (I...
Perhaps the Deputy knows more about the Minister's intentions in that respect than I do.
There was a Commission which investigated some time ago important matters affecting the development of the ports of Donegal. Perhaps it might not be out of place if the Minister would let us know whet...
This is an important matter for the people of Donegal, including the constituents of Deputy Dillon, who appears to be making a laughing stock of the whole thing.
I am speaking mainly in the interests of the people who will be affected by the closing down of this line. Suitable alternative employment cannot be provided for the men who will be thrown out of wor...
On that point, I understand the people responsible for the working of the line at the present time have expressed the view that it is possible to work the line without a subsidy inside about two years...
Under duress.
Was not that amount intended to enable them to purchase lorries?
No.
At the expense of the ratepayers.
They will have to pay for the road maintenance.
Revenue should by right.
| Last Updated: 17/05/2011 14:16:08 |
Page of 43
|