Lemass, Seán F.Tuesday, 21 May 1935 |
Dáil Éireann Debate
Page of 13
|
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Medical Examinations under Factory Act.
I would refer the Deputy to the Annual Reports for 1932 and 1933, in which he will find the desired particulars relating to those years. The figures for 1934 will be published in the Report for that ...
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Inspections and Prosecutions under Factory Act.
I propose to take Nos. 10 and 11 together. I would refer the Deputy to my reply to a Question addressed to me on these matters by Deputy Pattison on the 2nd May.
Tuesday Sittings.
The intention is to proceed with it, and I hope to have it circulated soon. There are certain difficulties in having the drafting of it completed at this time of the year on account of the pressure o...
If the Dáil is so willing. Motion put and agreed to.
In Committee on Finance. - Financial Motions. Resolution No. 28—General (Resumed).
I was merely refuting a statement made by Deputy Mulcahy.
Did the Deputy ever try to buy half-an-acre for a police barracks?
Yes, but the unemployment produces the high taxation—not the reverse.
The Government of the time proposed it.
You said you were not going to be pushed, anyway.
| Last Updated: 17/05/2011 13:23:53 |
Page of 13
|