O'Higgins, Michael JosephWednesday, 22 April 1964 |
Dáil Eireann Debate
Page of 42
|
And the lowest social services.
Why do you boys not try to get together——
Even the Central Statistics Office now is wrong.
Check with the Tánaiste.
The Parliamentary Secretary would be out of order if he did.
Do not put him off his stroke.
He said something he did not say?
Thanks for reminding me. I nearly forgot that.
It is also 4/10½d in Ireland.
Yes.
Many tourists will be tempted to go to the Northern part of Ireland rather than to the south, by-passing the Leas-Cheann Comhairle's county.
We remember when you marched them up to Dublin and back again and then taxed them. They were to get 4d a gallon and all they got was a tax and a cut.
They are not.
Between 1956 and now it is the same unemployment figure.
It is the people's money.
Committee on Finance. - Land Bill, 1963—Committee Stage (Resumed).
The Minister should not try to prevent discussion. A very serious principle is involved here.
Deputy Blowick and Deputy Flanagan have rightly spoken with some indignation on this section. Perhaps one tends to be repetitive on this question but certainly, in this Parliament 40 years after the ...
The right of free sale and the right freely to deal with one's land is part and parcel of the history of our whole land movement here. This section restricts the operation of the right of ownership. ...
I do not think it is an incorrect statement of the law.
I do not think it is. I have no doubt that what I said is reasonably accurate. The point I want to refer to is this. Here under the guise of a section in a Land Bill is something which brings in a...
I am sorry.
I think I am entitled to say that the effect of this section, if it is passed, may be to have the Land Commission officials and representatives of the Land Commission exercising arbitrary power which ...
I called for a House in order that Fianna Fáil Deputies—I am glad to see that Deputy Lalor has arrived—who will be asked to vote on this section will realise what their Minister is asking them to do. ...
If he said it, then it must be so.
That was on the following Monday.
If the Minister gave the definition?
The Deputy is easily satisfied.
Hear, hear.
I gather from what Deputy Flanagan said that the Minister, intervening in this debate, referred to the view I expressed earlier with regard to the definition of letting and subletting in section 12. ...
I do not know what the Minister said.
Then, I presume the Minister did not say that. May I repeat what I said earlier: in none of the Land Acts is there any definition of letting and subletting which excludes conacre, pasturage, agistmen...
You would never get the houses built in three days.
And I would agree with that.
| Last Updated: 15/09/2010 21:05:48 |
Page of 42
|