Wednesday, 27 March 1974
Dáil Eireann Debate
Mr. Crowley: asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the views of the EEC Council of Ministers in relation to direct election to the European Parliament; the form of democratic representation he envisages for Ireland; and the general powers which will be granted to the Parliament.
Dr. FitzGerald: The EEC Council of Minister has not had to express any view in recent times about direct elections to the European Parliament. With regard to the remainder of the question I would refer the Deputy to my reply to Question No. 13, Dáil Debates of 20th February, 1974, on European union.
Dr. FitzGerald: If there were a proposal which envisaged changing that and it did not contain compensating arrangements, for example, for a bicameral system with an Upper House with equal representation for states it would, of course, be unacceptable to us in this country.
Mr. Power: As the only view I have ever heard in this House was that a direct form of election would be best, does the Minister not agree that it might be better for us to act off our own bat rather than react to what others might do? Let us go ahead and set up the machinery for this form of democratisation. Would he not agree that direct elections would be better than the present system?
Dr. FitzGerald: I think we would all like to see that. There are technical difficulties, however, because the form of the wording of the Treaty of Rome is such that until there is unanimous agreement on direct elections by all  the countries the form of the representation must be such that those elected are members of the parliament of their own country. Therefore, if we had direct election and people stood who were not Members of this House and were elected they could not take their place in the parliament. That, unfortunately, is the wording of the Treaty of Rome and, therefore, we must, I think, put our main effort into seeking unanimous agreement on direct elections throughout Europe.
|Last Updated: 14/09/2010 21:46:04||Page of 40|