Written Answers. - Public Service Benchmarking.

Tuesday, 12 November 2002

Dáil Eireann Debate
Vol. 557 No. 1

First Page Previous Page Page of 301 Next Page Last Page

  90.  Mr. J. Bruton  Information on John Bruton  Zoom on John Bruton   asked the Minister for Finance  Information on Charlie McCreevy  Zoom on Charlie McCreevy   if he has made arrangements to pay the first phase of benchmarking in 2002 according to the backdating arrangements agreed. [21318/02]

[126]

  119.  Mr. Sherlock  Information on Joe Sherlock  Zoom on Joe Sherlock   asked the Minister for Finance  Information on Charlie McCreevy  Zoom on Charlie McCreevy   the Government's views on the final report of the Public Service Benchmarking Body; if the Government intends to implement the recommendations of the body; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21301/02]

Minister for Finance (Mr. McCreevy): Information on Charlie McCreevy  Zoom on Charlie McCreevy  I propose to take Questions Nos. 90 and 119 together.

The Public Service Benchmarking Body was established as an independent body in July 2000 under the terms of the PPF to examine public service pay and jobs by comparison with the private sector. The body reported in June 2002 and recommended varying level of pay increases for the grades examined.

It was agreed, as part of the adjustment to the PPF, that there would be discussions about the implementation of the report and also that one quarter of any increases recommended would be paid retrospectively from 1 December 2001. Talks commenced in July 2002 between the employers and unions about the implementation of the report and are continuing in the context of negotiations on arrangements to follow the PPF.

The cost of implementing the recommendations of the report is estimated to be €1.1 billion in a full year. Account will have to be taken of the impact this will have on the public finances in the light of the Government's commitment to keep them close to balance or in surplus. As I have indicated previously, there is a relationship between any new general round that might be agreed under a new programme and the benchmarking payments and this must be considered in the context of the budgetary pressures facing us.


Last Updated: 10/09/2010 17:40:07 First Page Previous Page Page of 301 Next Page Last Page