Lenihan, Brian Joseph

Thursday, 16 June 2005

Dáil Eireann Debate
Vol. 604 No. 2

First Page Previous Page Page of 152 Next Page Last Page

Order of Business.

Question put.
Yes IndicatorVoted Yes More Button

Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act 1998: Motion.

I move: That Dáil Éireann resolves that sections 2 to 12, 14 and 17 of the Offences against the State (Amendment) Act 1998 (No. 39 of 1998), shall continue in operation for the period of 12 months beg...More Button

Indeed, because there is no obligation on us to do that, although I do appreciate——More Button

The 1998 Act requires not that the report be laid 21 days before the moving of the resolution, but rather that the reporting period of the report ends not later than 21 days before the moving of the r...More Button

The resolution is not in breach. I appreciate the Deputy’s point about immediate adequate notice of the report and it is a fair one. However, in strict legislative terms, the statutory requirement is ...More Button

The report was laid before this House last Monday by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform. The conclusion of the report is that the relevant sections of the 1998 Act should remain in forc...More Button

The Deputy is answering his own questions.More Button

He is attending——More Button

I thank the various Members who contributed to this debate. In an ideal world we would not need offences against the State legislation but the experience of this State since 1937 has been that we need...More Button

There is nothing unusual in the rules of evidence prescribed in the 1998 legislation. Very free use of the adjectives “repressive” and “emergency” was made in the course of this debate.More Button

The Offences against the State Act is not emergency legislation but an ordinary part of the legislation of the State.More Button

Emergency legislation requires a proclamation under Article 28 of the Constitution. The legislation with which we are dealing is part of the ordinary legislation of the State.More Button

I want to go through the individual contributions. I thank Deputies Gerard Murphy and Crawford for their support. The Government, and I am sure all Deputies, share their concern that the Good Friday A...More Button

The review provision is contained in section 18.More Button

I want to accommodate the Deputy but I disagree with his interpretation of the section. The relevant paper submitted by the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform should be prepared in reasona...More Button

I cannot give the assurance of 21 days.More Button

I want to explain to the Deputy the reason for that. The reason I cannot give him a 21 day assurance is that the reference to 21 days in the third subsection of section 18 is a reference to the period...More Button

Therefore, it is impossible to do that. I agree with the Deputy that it is expressed in very legalese terms but that is the substance of it. I am prepared to say that a week’s notice would be reasonab...More Button

In regard to the wider matters raised by Deputy Costello, he raised a fair point that the problem of witness intimidation is a serious problem as well as the danger of jury intimidation, and neither i...More Button

If one peruses the Good Friday Agreement carefully it will be clear we did not say we would do anything about the review, but the Minister has——More Button

——undertaken to bring proposals to the Government on the entire set of recommendations contained in the Hederman report, and this he will do. In the past year the emphasis has been on ensuring the ena...More Button

I will not tie myself to a date this afternoon but I assure the Deputy the Minister has to the forefront of his ambitions implementation of the Hederman review. It should be noted that the majority vi...More Button

——of special courts under Article 38 of the Constitution, a matter that people expressly envisaged when they enacted the Constitution in 1937. Therefore, that is not an emergency court either. Deputy ...More Button

It is not necessary either to suggest that this legislation is motivated by anti-republicanism. This State is a Republic and has been valued as such since 1937 in the dictionary sense and since 1948 i...More Button

Question put: “That the motion be agreed to.”
Yes IndicatorVoted Yes More Button

Adjournment Debate - Health Services.

I am replying on behalf of my colleague, the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Harney. I thank and congratulate Deputy O’Connor for raising this matter as it provides me with an op...More Button

However, I understand from the Health Service Executive that this matter is receiving attention and the issue was discussed as recently as this week by the housing agency funding assessment panel, whi...More Button

Suicide Incidence.

I thank Deputy Neville for raising this matter on the adjournment this afternoon. The case to which the Deputy referred is a tragic one and I extend my condolences to the family concerned. Every sudde...More Button

Exploitation of Workers.

I thank Deputy Finian McGrath for raising this issue. I take it from the Ceann Comhairle’s ruling that there is to be no specific reference to the company concerned but that I can refer to the body as...More Button

Exploitation of Workers - School Staffing.

I thank Deputy Harkin for affording me the opportunity on behalf of the Minister for Education and Science to outline the position regarding Carramore national school, Swinford, County Mayo, concernin...More Button


Last Updated: 04/11/2010 05:42:25 First Page Previous Page Page of 152 Next Page Last Page