O'Flynn, NoelWednesday, 8 July 2009 |
Dáil Eireann Debate
Page of 344
|
Order of Business.
Question put: “That the proposal for dealing with No. 25 be agreed to.”
Voted Yes 
Question put: “That the proposal for dealing with No. 4 be agreed to.”
Voted Yes
Defamation Bill 2006 [Seanad]: Report and Final Stages.
Amendment No. 3 in the name of Deputy Rabbitte arises out of committee proceedings.
Amendment No. 4 in the name of Deputy Rabbitte arises out of committee proceedings.
Amendment No. 5 is out of order.
Amendments Nos. 9 and 10 are related and may be discussed together by agreement.
Does this relate to amendments Nos. 9 and 10?
That is relevant to section 39 and I am advised there are no amendments down for that section. It comes in loosely under the section dealing with apologies.
While I am obliged by Standing Orders to suspend the sitting for the sos, only three minutes remain for this Bill.
Is that agreed?
This is by order of the Dáil today.
Is the Aire accepting amendment No. 10?
I am obliged to put the question.
As the time permitted for this debate has expired, I am required to put the following question in accordance with an order of the Dáil of this day: That amendment No. 10 and the amendments set down by...
The Bill, which is considered by virtue of article 20.2.2° of the Constitution as a Bill initiated in Dáil Éireann, will now be sent to the Seanad.
| Last Updated: 07/10/2010 13:26:20 |
Page of 344
|