Dáil Eireann

1. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the number of farmers participating in the rural environment protection scheme on the date the scheme was suspended; the number of farmers whose REP scheme plans have since expired; the number expected to expire by the end of 2009 and 2010; if his attention has been drawn to the [63]impact that this decision is having on individual farm families at a time when farm incomes and commodity prices are in free-fall; if he will review this decision and honour the programme for Government commitments of 70,000 farmers in the REP scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36516/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): On 9 July 2009, when I announced the closure of REPS to new applications, there were 55,630 farmers in the scheme. These included 12,575 who had applied for REPS 4 in 2008. In addition, the Department had received a further 16,718 applications before the 2009 closing date of 15 May, and these are currently being processed for entry into the scheme.

Since 9 July, 4,639 farmers have completed their contracts in REPS. Another 5,704 will have finished by 31 December 2009. All of these would have had an opportunity to apply for REPS by this year’s closing date of 15 May to ensure that they could continue in the scheme. By 31 December 2010, a further 9,698 will have completed their contracts in REPS.

REPS 4 was closed to new applicants in July against the background of the situation in the public finances, the resources available to the Department and the substantial increase, over the past year, in the number of REPS participants. As indicated, almost 17,000 applications were received up to the closing date of 15 May for the 2009 scheme, and further applications which were received up to the time of closure will be processed as applications for 2010. Payments due to REPS farmers for 2009 will be the highest ever and all participants already in REPS will continue to receive annual payments until their current contracts run their course. The number of farmers in REPS is more than enough to ensure that all EU co-funding negotiated in the current rural development plan will be drawn down.

I plan to introduce a new agri-environment scheme in 2010 which will reduce compliance costs to participants and which will provide a menu of targeted actions from which farmers may choose. Funding for the new scheme will include the additional modulation funds which I ensured will be retained for the benefit of Irish farmers in the negotiations on what may be termed the CAP health check. It will also include additional Exchequer funding. In August 2009, I invited submissions on the proposed new scheme. The details of the scheme are in the process of being finalised. It will require the approval of the European Commission, which has already received an outline of our proposals.

I am acutely aware of the current difficult situation with regard to farm incomes and of the intense pressure on many farm families. Yesterday, I announced the commencement of advance payments of 70% of single farm payments amounting to in excess of €800 million which will begin in the coming days. This is the first time that an advance of this magnitude has been paid at this early stage of the year; the official opening date for release of single farm payments is 1 December in each year. Furthermore, the payment of €220 million under the disadvantaged area scheme commenced last month. The combination of these two schemes together with payments under REPS and the suckler cow scheme amounts to payments of more than €1.8 billion to Irish farmers during 2009 and represents substantial and necessary support for farm incomes. I have also been working closely with like-minded ministerial colleagues in other member states to ensure the deployment of the full range of the EU market support instruments to support the dairy sector which has been undergoing a particularly difficult time.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House.

In addition, more than €300 million in investment support will be paid in the agri-food and fisheries sectors and almost €120 million in supports for the forestry and bio-energy sectors [64]this year. My Department also supports investment in research and development in the agri-sector, the provision of investment support for the processing sectors, the protection of Irish farms from animal and plant diseases. I remain committed to providing the highest possible level of support for farm incomes and the agri-food sector.

Deputy Michael Creed: I thank the Minister for his reply and I implore him to step back, even at this late stage, from this madness and economic folly by the Government. What the Minister will save will be spent by the Minister for Social and Family Affairs on an increased number of farm assist payments.

Rounded up, the figures given by the Minister suggest that by the end of 2010, approximately 20,000 less than the current total of 62,000 will be in REPS. This will cause phenomenal hardship to farm families. The Minister is aware that the Teagasc farm survey for 2008 and the anticipated results of a survey for 2009 will show income reductions of the magnitude of 30% to 35%. No other sector in the economy is suffering this type of income collapse. REPS puts bread and butter on the table for many farmers and it is collateral for bank loans.

I remind the Minister of a commitment in the programme for Government — although I appreciate that it is a work of fiction — to have participation rates of 70,000. However, he stated that by the end of 2010 it will be reduced to 42,000. Will the Minister step back from this folly? It is not too late to change his mind, admit he made a mistake and reopen REPS 4 for those ending their participation in REPS 2 or REPS 3 to maintain the participation levels at 62,000.

Deputy Brendan Smith: I understand it is easy to take from the figures I gave that 10,000 will exit the scheme each year. That is not correct. There will be almost 63,000 participating in the scheme this year. The number of people who may potentially exit the scheme next year will be less than 10,000. I can provide the Deputy with the figures afterwards but I want to be clear about this to the House. In excess of 1,500 applications were received subsequent to 15 May and prior to 9 July and the REPS 4 plans of these people will begin in 2010.

We will have 63,000 participants this year and next year we will have somewhat less. However, we will introduce a new agri-environment measure and the priority category for this new scheme will be those who have exited REPS 3. The level of funding available for the scheme has not yet been determined. What has been determined is that all the modulation funds and the European economic recovery programme available to the Department has been ring-fenced in its entirety for this agri-environment measure. The supplementing and Exchequer funding that will be provided for the scheme will not be determined until the Estimates budgetary process for 2010 is complete. This year, we have almost 63,000 participants in REPS, last year it was 46,000 and 17,000 new applicants entered the scheme prior to the 15 May deadline. This is by far the highest ever level of new applicants.

Deputy Michael Creed: Does the Minister accept that a knock-on effect of his decision will be to force more farmers onto farm assist? On the basis that REPS is 45% co-financed by Europe this is a false economy as the State pays 100% of farm assist payments.

Did the Minister read the full McCarthy report prior to glancing at that initial recommendation of suspending access to REPS 4? It stated that a full value for money audit of the scheme should be conducted. The Minister of State, Deputy Sargent, who is sitting beside the Minister is a member of the Green Party, which is the great champion of the environment. There have been and continue to be huge benefits to the agri-environment as a result of REPS. The scheme [65]which is proposed to replace it is a Mickey Mouse scheme that will do nothing for the environment or for farm incomes. I implore the Minister even at this late stage to withdraw his revised rural development plan programme in Europe and return to full access to REPS 4.

Deputy Brendan Smith: Deputy Creed would rightly be complaining at Question Time if we did not send a revised rural development plan to Brussels by 15 July. That was to draw down modulated funds and unused funds that had become available to us for the first time. We do not leave one cent in Europe, we draw down every single cent. Our rural development plan consists more of Exchequer funding than European funding. Of course in the context of deciding what level of funding will be available for REPS from the Exchequer, analysis will be done on people’s income and on those who will exit the scheme and may have to rely on farm assist payments. We are conscious of this.

I want to be very clear on the following point. We had to make a decision to send a revised rural development plan to Brussels by 15 July. The McCarthy report had no bearing whatsoever on decisions we made on REPS. I did not see it until it was published.

Deputy Michael Creed: The Department had an input into it. It made recommendations.

Deputy Brendan Smith: That input was that we would rationalise a number of regional offices throughout the country, cut back on administration and create greater efficiencies to provide a better service for the farmers of the country. We are implementing that. It was one of the major recommendations.

Deputy Michael Creed: The best service for farmers is REPS 4.

Deputy Brendan Smith: I agree REPS 4 is a great scheme. It must be remembered it was implemented and is paid for by the Government.

Deputy Andrew Doyle: It is paid for by Europe.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: I have called the Minister on Question No. 2.

Deputy Brendan Smith: No, that is not the case. Over 50% of it is paid for by the Exchequer.

Deputy Michael Creed: It is 55:45.

2. Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the status of the REP scheme; the date of payment for REP scheme 4 in 2009; if sufficient funding is available to meet REP scheme 3 and 4 payments in 2009; the breakdown of the number of farmers in the REP scheme; and the persons who applied for the REP scheme in 2009 by county. [36202/09]

Deputy Brendan Smith: REPS 4 was closed to new applicants in July against the background of the situation in the public finances, the resources available to the Department and the substantial increase in the past year in the number of REPS participants. Almost 17,000 applications were received up to the closing date of 15 May for 2009. Further applications which were received up to the time of closure will be processed as applications for 2010. Payments due to REPS farmers for 2009 will be the highest ever and all participants already in REPS will continue to receive annual payments until their current contracts run their course.

I plan to introduce a new agri-environment scheme in 2010 which will reduce compliance costs to participants and provide a menu of targeted actions from which farmers may choose. [66] Funding for the new scheme will include the additional modulation funds which I ensured would be retained for the benefit of Irish farmers in the negotiations on the Common Agricultural Policy health check. It will also include additional matching Exchequer funding. The scheme’s details are being finalised and will require the approval of the European Commission, which has already received an outline of our proposals.

Just under 51,000 farmers are in REPS. In addition, the Department is processing 16,718 applications received for REPS 4 in 2009 up to the closing date of 15 May. I will forward Deputy Sherlock a breakdown of these applications by county. A further 1,509 applications were received after this date and before the scheme closed to new applicants on 9 July. If they meet the scheme’s requirements, this group of applicants will start their contracts in 2010.

As a measure approved as part of the current rural development programme, REPS 4 is subject to EU regulations which require detailed administrative checks on all applications, including plan checks, to be completed before the first 2009 payments issue. My officials are working on the processing of applications with a view to facilitating the release of payments at the earliest possible date.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: If the original REPS plan was an agri-environment measure, why is it necessary to do away with the scheme and reintroduce an agri-environment measure which will have the same aims? Why did the Minister not refer to biodiversity? It will be argued the scheme was used as a supplementary income measure in some cases. The scheme’s closure will result in more applicants for farm assist, which is already happening in some areas. Considering the biodiversity measures already contained under the existing scheme and its success, it seems illogical that a new scheme needs to be introduced when the old scheme could be continued.

Deputy Brendan Smith: No one’s income from REPS has been affected by the decisions announced in July. This relates to 2010 and people exiting the scheme in 2009. The highest level of payment under the scheme will be this year.

All Members will have received representations from individual farmers about the thorough, detailed and demanding inspection process to ensure that the applicant meets the scheme’s criteria and standards. One benefit of the new scheme will be that farmers will not need to put in a whole-farm plan. Many farmers had to pay out €1,500 to put in a particular plan but this money can now be saved. The whole-farm undertaking has been a demanding process both for the farmer complying with every single criteria and the Department as the paying agency to ensure that it does not run foul of any Commission audits.

We want to introduce a good agri-environment measure to succeed REPS 3 for those who will exit it and be the priority category. People will be able to choose from a large number of measures.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: Will the new scheme — we can call it the agri-environment measure for the time being — be administered by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food? What was the average pay out to farmers under REPS?

Deputy Brendan Smith: The average pay out was €6,200. In the part of the province of Ulster which does not come under our jurisdiction, the average pay out was €1,390 per farmer. Our scheme has been beneficial and, as the Deputy rightly pointed out, it is not just an income support. There are costs to the individual farmer arising from participating in the scheme. There are also benefits for the public good as well as the individual farmer. As Deputies Creed [67]and Sherlock said, the scheme has brought good environmental benefits to the countryside. The farming community is the guardian of our countryside. Participation in REPS has offered a whole new approach to the protection, nurturing and cultivation of our environment. The new agri-environment measures that will be introduced will help that work considerably.

I appreciate the importance of REPS as an income to the farming community. It was not, however, a direct payment as substantial costs were incurred by every participant in the scheme to ensure that their farming practices were up to standard. The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food will administer the new scheme.

3. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the initiatives he plans to introduce to deal with the income collapse of beef farmers in view of the collapse in the price of store and finished beef cattle; his plans to assist with live exports of cattle to the UK; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36517/09]

Deputy Brendan Smith: The value of Irish beef exports in 2008 reached almost €1.7 billion and accounted for almost one fifth of total Irish agrifood exports. The beef industry remains very important in our international trade balance, but also to the rural economy as its contribution is widely dispersed.

Notwithstanding this, and in common with many other sectors of the economy, beef is experiencing difficult times. As consumers and economies have come under pressure, there has been a noticeable shift in spending patterns with a discernible move towards cheaper meats and lower value cuts. This is evident in all of our key markets and is consequently impacting on producer returns. In addition, the strengthening of the euro against sterling presents another challenge to beef exporters, given the importance of the British market.

In 2008, average prices in all beef categories increased significantly, in some cases by almost 20%, and reached record levels. Given that prices are a function of the returns available in the marketplace, the lower prices experienced during 2009, while unwelcome, are not entirely unexpected. The decline in prices to date in 2009 is around 12%. However, prices still remain significantly ahead of both medium and long-term averages for all categories. I am aware of the difficulties falling prices present to both producers and processors alike. The Department and relevant agencies are taking several appropriate steps to address these.

While conditions remain challenging in both our domestic and international markets, our beef exports have remained remarkably resilient. Shipments to both Britain and our main continental markets have held up very well with Bord Bia reporting only slight declines in the year to date. Producers and processors have responded to the changing marketplace and are maintaining their presence in the face of considerable difficulties.

The live export trade is also an important element of our meat and livestock industry and provides a complement to the beef trade. To date this year, this trade has been exceptionally strong with exports almost doubling compared to 2008. Bord Bia continues to work closely with the industry in monitoring and developing emerging opportunities for Irish livestock in the British, continental and international markets. This includes contacts with leading retailers in Britain to establish their interest in cattle born in Ireland and finished in Britain.

The Government, the Department and its support agencies, including Enterprise Ireland, Teagasc and Bord Bia, have developed a variety of non-price strategies to deal with evolving market challenges. Among these are the capital investment aid scheme for the beef and sheepmeat sectors, breed improvement programmes being progressed by the Irish Cattle Breeding [68]Federation and the animal welfare scheme for suckler herds. These schemes concentrate on using the best available scientific and genetic data to further improve the cattle herd and ultimately improve returns to the producer.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House.

The beef quality assurance scheme, administered by Bord Bia is crucial in reassuring consumers that the beef they purchase from Ireland meets the highest standards of quality, safety and traceability.

In tandem with these initiatives Bord Bia is implementing an enhanced Irish beef promotion strategy for the period 2008-13 in conjunction with key continental retail outlets. Previous efforts to differentiate and reposition Irish beef, concentrating as they have on the key characteristics of Irish beef — traditional grass-based production, full traceability and quality assurance — have proved extremely successful. It is crucial that we continue to target our marketing efforts and promotional strategies on consolidating our place in the valuable European market. Bord Bia is undertaking a 2009 autumn beef promotion campaign aimed at 40 million Europeans in ten major markets.

I am acutely aware of the importance of direct payments to farmers, particularly when market returns are at low levels. In 2008, these payments represented almost one third of total farm revenue, the most important being the single farm payment. I am pleased to remind Deputies that, following my request to the European Commission earlier in the summer, advance payment of some 70% of the single farm payment will commence tomorrow. This payment, in the region of €800 million, is unprecedented and will assist farmers greatly in dealing with cash flow difficulties. I also intend to maximise the balance of payments due before Christmas.

It is true that 2009 has been a difficult year for all sectors of farming with beef producers especially affected. A number of factors have combined to deliver a series of challenges which have had a significant impact on the livelihood of many in the sector. However, I am confident that, thanks to the undoubted quality and uniqueness of our product, together with the range of initiatives I have mentioned, the sector will be well positioned to take advantage of the evolving prospects that recovery will bring. Indeed, European Commission projections of a continued decline in beef production on the Continent over the medium term, thus widening the supply gap already in existence, may even serve to provide further opportunities for Irish producers to fill.

Deputy Michael Creed: Does the Minister support live exports?

Deputy Brendan Smith: Absolutely.

Deputy Michael Creed: The critical issue for returns to Irish beef farmers from live exports is that the live cattle exported to the United Kingdom can be slaughtered there. Over the years this State, through its various agencies, has delivered substantial grant aid to Irish meat processors and is delivering in the region of €50 million in grant aid under the meat investment fund to the main players who are active in the Irish meat processing market and in the UK. It is also giving work permits although there are 400,000 unemployed here. I do not understand the logic of that.

The Ministers for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Enterprise, Trade and Employment have leverage on this issue. This House was recalled in the late 1980s to bail out the Goodman group when it threatened to go under but it and others, Kepak, and Dawn, are active in the [69]UK and collude to prevent the slaughter of Irish exported live cattle in their plants in England. They are also putting pressure on other small abattoirs to refuse to slaughter cattle. That costs Irish beef producers in the region of €150 a head. Will the Ministers continue to sit on their hands and pay €50 million in grant aid to close down the beef industry here? Beef farmers will not continue to dip into their single farm payment to subsidise beef production. The consequences of that will be job losses in processing and in the food industry downstream. If the Minister supports live exports what will he do about the problem of slaughtering live exported animals in the UK?

Deputy Brendan Smith: I fully support the export of live cattle but we need a balance between the cattle for slaughter here and the competition from live exports. The number of cattle exported to Britain up to 4 October last represents an increase of 613% over the comparable period in 2008, and the number exported to Northern Ireland represents an increase of 286% a year on.

I am aware of the difficulties and was working on this prior to any media commentary. I met the farming groups and individual farmers.

Deputy Michael Creed: Did the Minister meet the Goodman group?

Deputy Brendan Smith: No, I meet representative groups.

Deputy Michael Creed: The Minister will go on paying the grants until he gets a bit of cop on.

Deputy Brendan Smith: I met farmers and people involved in all the farming organisations who told me that there are buyers in Britain anxious to purchase Irish cattle. We have taken up the various issues raised. Bord Bia and our veterinary services have been in contact with the Chief Veterinary Officer in Britain.

Irish exporters encounter two difficulties in Britain, the veterinary issues concerning the post-import conditions imposed by the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Development, and technical beef labelling issues surrounding the finished beef product and other beef industry complications. Over the past few weeks and earlier I met ICOS in its capacity as the umbrella body for the marts organisations and outlined what we had been doing to remove the blockages from the system. My officials have worked actively with the representative groups here and with the veterinary people in Britain.

We have involved Bord Bia on the beef labelling scheme and I have asked it to offer advice and to find out how we can overcome the labelling difficulty for cattle born in Ireland but fattened and slaughtered in the UK. They will not get a British quality assurance mark. Bord Bia has worked with the industry and has put a proposal for a beef quality assurance scheme to include cattle for export. The scheme would draw on data from the beef quality assurance and the beef suckler welfare schemes and other requirements at export level and incorporate auditing of participants including unannounced audits to verify compliance. Such a scheme could enable Irish born animals to access higher value market channels in the destination country. Bord Bia has communicated this proposal to the industry. The initial feedback from the industry and from a live exporter has been positive. The scheme would have to meet with the approval of buyers in the British market. We need access to that market without confusion about the labelling of the product.

Deputy Michael Creed: Has the Minister met with the meat plants? They are the problem. His Department and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment will pay them €50 [70]million in grant aid and give them work permits. This is nothing short of national sabotage by the meat plants that operate in Ireland and the UK. We have no problem exporting live bull beef to Italy, or calves to Holland but we have a problem getting our animals into the UK where the market is worth €1.7 billion. Is the Minister going to sit on his hands and talk to everybody but those responsible, the meat plants, the Goodman group, Dawn and Kepak, in particular? Will he meet the meat plants and tell them he will not pay the money they are getting under the meat investment——

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: The Deputy has asked that question three times.

Deputy Michael Creed: I have not got an answer yet.

Deputy Brendan Smith: We conveyed to Meat Industry Ireland, MII, the representative organisation for the producers very clearly the concerns expressed to us by the exporters and farmers.

Deputy Michael Creed: What did they say?

Deputy Brendan Smith: We have put particular queries to the Chief Veterinary Officer in Britain and await a response. We have been told about the difficulties and have said that we want to work to eliminate them. We are waiting for the Chief Veterinary Officer to reply and tell us if there is anything we need to address.

4. Deputy Tom Sheahan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has received advice on the potential financial repercussions which may arise for his Department following contact from the Office of the Ombudsman relating to the lost at sea scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36518/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Tony Killeen): The lost at sea scheme was a limited scheme introduced in June 2001, with a closing date of 31 December 2001. Its objective was to enable qualifying applicants, who were otherwise unable to do so for financial or related reasons, to continue a family tradition of sea-fishing.

The scheme provided replacement capacity, gross tons and kilowatts, that the applicant would otherwise have had to purchase on the tonnage market, for the purpose of introducing a replacement vessel in respect of fishing boats lost at sea between 1980 and the establishment of the fishing boat register in 1990. The terms of the scheme also specified further conditions pertaining to the use of the capacity once it was deemed eligible. The conditions of the scheme as published were:

“The capacity of a vessel which was lost at sea before the coming into operation of the (Sea Fishing Boat) Register set up by the 1989 Regulations will, as an entirely exceptional measure, be accepted as replacement capacity provided that the Department is fully satisfied, by reference to appropriate documentary evidence, that:

(a) the applicant was the owner and skipper of a registered Irish sea boat which was lost at sea;

[71]

(b) the boat in question was lost at sea after 1 January 1980 as a result of an accident, and that such loss has been verified by the emergency services or another independent source acceptable to the Department;

(c) the boat in question is shown, by reference to log sheet returns or other appropriate records, to have been in active and continuous use for a considerable period of years by the person concerned for sea fishing of a category now covered by the replacement policy rules, until its loss at sea;

(d) the lost vessel was the sole means (i.e. the only vessel) of the applicant for engaging in sea fishing;

(e) the applicant was unable, for verified financial or related reasons, to acquire a replacement vessel, or any other registered vessel, before the introduction of the new Register pursuant to the 1989 Regulations;

Deputy Tom Sheahan: Will the Minister of State answer my question? His time will run out and I will not have received an answer.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: That is a matter for the Chair. Will the Minister of State continue the answer?

Deputy Tony Killeen: They further read:

(f) the applicant has been unable also, for verified financial or related reasons, since the inception of the new registration system, to acquire a fishing vessel to engage in sea fishing of the same class or description as was carried out by the vessel lost at sea——

Deputy Michael Creed: We had that in a written reply.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Allow the Minister of State to speak. Questions are put and Deputies are given an opportunity to listen.

Deputy Michael Creed: Tactics.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: There is then an opportunity for questioning, Deputy Creed. That is the way the operation of the House will continue. The Minister of State, without interruption.

Deputy Tony Killeen: ——or any other sea fishing vessel which is subject to the replacement policy regime;

(g) the applicant did not receive any financial benefit from the loss.

The capacity of a fishing vessel lost at sea will be accepted as replacement capacity for licensing purposes only if it is to be used for the purposes of sustaining or maintaining a family tradition of sea fishing. Any capacity accepted as replacement capacity must, therefore, be used for the purposes of introducing a replacement for the lost vessel which will be owned and skippered by the applicant or by an immediate relation of the applicant. Any capacity from a lost vessel so used may not be sold or otherwise disposed of.

[72]Additional information not given on the floor of the House.

Applications under the scheme must be received by 31 December 2001.

My Department has been corresponding with the Ombudsman about a complaint made to her by an unsuccessful applicant under this scheme. This correspondence is ongoing and the Deputy will appreciate that I am not in a position to speculate on possible financial or other outcomes until the matter has been concluded.

Deputy Michael Creed: On a point of order, Deputy Sheahan raised a material question, namely, whether the Minister has taken advice in his Department. This is outrageous.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: The Deputy knows these are Priority Questions and the only person who can ask a further question is Deputy Sheahan who tabled the original one. Please allow him speak. I am sure the Deputy will make a point and ask a question.

Deputy Tom Sheahan: I asked the Minister if he had received advice on the potential financial repercussions which may arise for his Department following contact from the Ombudsman’s office relating to the lost at sea scheme.

Deputy Michael Creed: There was no answer.

Deputy Tom Sheahan: I received no answer. I tabled a similar question last week to which I received a written reply yesterday which was what the Minister of State has just read out. The lost at sea scheme——

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: The Deputy should put his question directly to the Minister of State.

Deputy Tom Sheahan: I thank the Leas-Cheann Comhairle. Concerning the lost at sea scheme, may I quote the Ombudsman?

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: I am afraid the Deputy cannot quote during Question Time but he can refer to material.

4 o’clock

Deputy Tom Sheahan: I shall refer to it. It points out that while acknowledging that the Department, under European Council Regulation No. 2371/2002, is of the opinion that the lost at sea scheme cannot be revisited, the Ombudsman’s office considers that it did not address the central issue which is that the scheme was seriously deficient and flawed as outlined in previous correspondence to the Department. Accordingly, the office has reverted to the Department requesting that it outline how it proposes to address this issue.

The lost at sea scheme was introduced, as the Minister of State noted, to get people back fishing who had lost their boats. It was abused and in the Ombudsman’s words, was “seriously deficient and flawed”. I am led to believe the Ombudsman’s report will be brought to the House next week with a recommendation that one family which was refused entry into the scheme would have to be compensated. The point is that 62 other applicants were refused. This is what I am trying to find out and that was why I posed the question as I did, to receive an answer from the Minister of State.

Has the Minister of State looked at the financial repercussions that may be present for the taxpayer and the State? Has he discussed this with his Departmental colleague, the Minister [73]of State, Deputy Trevor Sargent, who lodged a complaint with the Standards in Public Office Commission regarding the handling by former Ministers of the scheme? Does the Minister of State, Deputy Sargent, still consider that Deputy Fahey’s handling of the scheme is worthy of complaint?

Deputy Michael Creed: The silent Minister of State, Deputy Sargent.

Deputy Trevor Sargent: It was not my question.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: The Minister of State, Deputy Killeen.

Deputy Tony Killeen: The Department is corresponding with the Ombudsman’s office with regard to this scheme and the matter has not been concluded. Detailed legal advice was sought from the Attorney General’s office, was considered and acted upon. It would be virtually impossible to answer the Deputy’s question in detail, for a number of reasons. There are perhaps three considerations of some importance, two of which relate to the conditions of the scheme. First, if, finally, there were to be a recommendation for payment in this case, the applicant made the application considerably outside the application period. That would relate not only to the 62 vessels which were refused but to an unknown number of others.

Deputy Tom Sheahan: Others were approved before the scheme closed.

Deputy Tony Killeen: That might come into play. That is one element of the answer to the point made by Deputy Sheahan. Second, apart from the closing date that was not met by the applicant in question, it is difficult to speculate what judgments will be made regarding other applicants who might not have met other conditions of the scheme. It is impossible to know how many there were. It is also important to bear in mind that no money was paid to anybody, nor was any tradeable asset made available to anybody under the terms of the scheme. If money were to be paid arising from this it appears it would be in accordance with the decommissioning scheme which is entirely separate and has nothing whatsoever to do with this scheme. In the circumstances, while one would have enormous sympathy for the family concerned and would obviously wish to be in a position to provide some recompense, there would have to be no doubt that the motivation in setting up the scheme was along those lines. The fact is that unless one knew what conditions might be set aside in any judgment it would be impossible to predict what the cost might be.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: A brief supplementary, Deputy Sheahan.

Deputy Tom Sheahan: They got no money. That is correct. However, they got 200 tonnes of quota, with a value of €10,000 per tonne between two men. That is 75% of the whole tonnage available to the 68 applicants. Two men from County Galway got 75% of it. It was because of the way it was worked——

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: A question, please.

Deputy Tom Sheahan: I have to lead up to it. It was the way it was worked. Four months before the scheme was launched the then Minister met with the two applicants and told them to apply. The closing date for the scheme was December 2001 yet the Minister wrote to the two applicants in October 2001 and congratulated them. Thereafter, the Attorney General’s advice was that they had to receive this settlement because of the Minister’s letter. This was a [74]con job and a set-up. I ask the Minister of State, Deputy Sargent, while he is present, if he still believes this con job is worthy of a complaint to the Standards in Public Office Commission.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: A final reply from the Minister of State.

Deputy Tony Killeen: It is a very common error. People assume in these cases that a quota was provided rather than financial recompense. What was provided was tonnage and kilowatt hours, which is considerably different in many respects. A condition was imposed on the scheme which I understand was included at the insistence of the Minister, namely, that it could not be tradeable or otherwise disposed of to the benefit of the people who got it. There were also conditions in respect of the ownership and skippering of the vessel which ensured that only the family who had the loss could benefit from it.

In the circumstances, only six vessels of the 68 that applied were successful. In the setting up of the scheme it would have been impossible for anybody to predict what kilowatts and tonnage might have been required to be made available to vessels that were successful. If 20 vessels had been successful, or indeed one other large vessel, there would have been implications for the percentage that was awarded. At this stage it is very easy to be wise and say that particular people benefited for particular reasons. As far as I am concerned, the Department has administered the scheme fairly and in accordance with the conditions of the scheme. If those conditions are to be changed at this stage, I cannot tell the Deputy what the implications are because it is impossible to know.

Deputy Michael Creed: It is easy to be wise afterwards.

Deputy Tom Sheahan: Does the Minister of State believe a good job was done?

Deputy Michael Creed: The Ombudsman does not agree with him.

5. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has made a submission to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment’s public consultation process in relation to the introduction of a code of practice for grocery goods undertakings; if he has made a proposal to the EU Commissioner regarding the proposed code of conduct for grocery retailers in view of the plan to publish a report on anti-competitive practices before the end of 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36519/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Trevor Sargent): The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment consulted closely with my Department in preparing the consultation paper for the public consultation process, which was launched last August. Her Department is currently assessing some 28 submissions received from a range of interests. It is my intention to work in close consultation with the Tánaiste in developing a code on the lines of our programme for government.

The proposed introduction of a code of practice for grocery goods undertakings follows public debate on grocery prices and price differentials. The consultation in August was undertaken to address concerns raised about the nature of the relationships between grocery goods businesses and, in particular, in the relationships between suppliers and retailers of grocery goods. The questions asked of stakeholders, including consumers included whether any such code of practice should be voluntary or statutory in nature; how it might best be enforced; [75]whether a separate Ombudsman’s office should be established; whether there should be a threshold to limit its application, and what impact application of such a code might have on consumer choice and prices.

Underlying the debate is the increasing concentration of retail power in the hands of a few large supermarket chains. This is an international phenomenon, which has fundamentally changed the balance of market negotiating power in the food chain. It is one factor, although not the only one, contributing to the declining share of the retail price received by producers. Although there is, of course, always potential for some tension in any market relationship, there has been a noticeable trend recently towards greater tension, and even allegations of sharp practice.

At the Council of Ministers I raised the issue of the need for balance in the food supply chain and colleagues in the Council also expressed strong views on this matter. In January there was a discussion on a road map to improve the functioning of the food supply chain. I said then that competition alone cannot act as a sole mechanism to maintain efficient markets. The careful and sensitive use of market management measures can help to maintain balance on the market when appropriate and the use of such mechanisms can assist in the provision of fair returns to producers.

At EU level there is a need to give urgent thought to ensuring that markets function well and that unfair practices are prevented. The agri-food industry is hugely important to Ireland and the EU. The EU needs to safeguard its production base so that it can meet the future demand of its population for food, feed and bio-energy. It is my firm view that retailers must strike a reasonable balance between granting value for consumers and giving to suppliers and producers. Balance between all stakeholders, including suppliers, producers, retailers and consumers may well be difficult to achieve but the Tánaiste and I are committed to working towards mechanisms at EU level.

Deputy Andrew Doyle: I thank the Leas-Cheann Comhairle and the Minister of State. It is a fact that three multiples control approximately 70% and five control 85%. It is also a fact that the price of dairy products at the farm gate dropped an average of 34% last year, but only 3% for the consumer. Against this background, the Minister of State claims that the Government will produce something along the lines agreed in the programme for Government, which seems to suggest a voluntary code as opposed to a statutory code.

Deputy Trevor Sargent: No.

Deputy Andrew Doyle: The UK tried a voluntary code of good behaviour, but that did not work and it is revisiting the matter and will make the code statutory. Ironically, the Tánaiste published her Bill a day after we published ours, which we intend to lay before the House soon. Our fair trade food information Bill lays out in black and white what is an offence, what penalties can be imposed, retailers’ obligations in terms of credit facilities and who is obliged to oversee the area. Commissioner Fischer Boel has indicated that, before she finishes her term, she intends to produce a report on the behaviour in question. It is obvious that, if this is a problem in Europe, it is definitely a problem in Ireland and Britain where supermarket chains seem to demand higher margins.

Why not start at the right place, that is, a statutory code? No compliant retailer would have anything to worry about with our Bill or a statutory code. The chief executive of one group stated that it would add costs, but this is not the case. For example, keeping the requisite [76]records would cost no more than an audit of the business operation. The claim is a red herring. We should put the code on a statutory basis from day one.

Deputy Trevor Sargent: I appreciate the contributions of Deputy Doyle and his party to the ongoing debate. Like him, I would like to act on this matter quickly. Likewise, the Tánaiste has stated that she would put something in place within 24 hours if she could. However, the reality is that there is a process——

Deputy Michael Creed: She said there would be no problem immediately after we published our Bill.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: This is a priority question in the name of Deputy Doyle.

Deputy Trevor Sargent: I will try not to be drawn. To be carried through effectively and successfully, the process must take into account the fact that the Tánaiste’s Department is assessing 27 submissions. We are actively engaging with her Department, given the critical nature of what is at stake for the agrifood sector.

It is not true to say that the code has been predetermined to be voluntary. It is too early to say whether it will be voluntary or statutory. As the Deputy may have read in the review of the programme for Government, there is a clear opening whereby, if necessary, the code will be put on a mandatory basis. However, due process must be followed and everyone with an interest must be heard.

Deputy Andrew Doyle: The Joint Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has received evidence from people who are not directly involved but are interested in this area, such as the economist Mr. Jim Power, Dr. Ciaran Fitzgerald and others. They have discovered that 100,000 jobs will be in jeopardy if we do not address this issue as soon as possible. The Commissioner has identified the matter as a European problem, but must we wait for EU guidelines? Can we not see that the Irish situation is more acute? The facts are there concerning the price differentials between what the consumer pays and what the supplier is paid. It is obvious what is occurring.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: There is too much consultation.

Deputy Michael Creed: Yes.

Deputy Trevor Sargent: As this is a priority question, I must turn a deaf ear to Deputy Sherlock at the moment, but I will talk with him afterwards.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: That is fine. I am used to that.

Deputy Michael Creed: The Minister of State does not need to turn a deaf ear to find——

Deputy Trevor Sargent: I will answer the question in as straightforward a manner as I can. Commissioner Fischer Boel’s opinion and work on the roadmap in respect of the communication on food prices will be implemented by the end of 2009. While having it sooner would be great, Deputy Doyle will understand the importance of the European market for us. While we need to proceed quickly, we cannot do so in isolation from the European Commission. In the meantime, other avenues are open to us.

[77]As the Deputy stated, the supermarket chains dominate the food sector, but this issue must be addressed in its own right. A code of practice, be it mandatory or voluntary, will not change it, but it may be helped by having other access routes to market. There are many ways to address the matter that would allow us to save jobs and create new ones.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: I am afraid we are running over time on every question in this session.

6. Deputy Liz McManus asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the measures in the Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programme specifically targeting cuts at Teagasc which are to be implemented. [36215/09]

Deputy Tony Killeen: The Government has not made any decisions regarding implementation of the recommendations in the Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programme as they concern Teagasc. The 2010 Estimates process is under way and measures to secure savings in the public finances will be considered in that context. It is not possible at this stage to comment on the specific outcomes of the budgetary process.

It is the responsibility of the Teagasc authority to exercise full and effective control over the organisation. Ministerial responsibility is confined to matters of policy in accordance with the Act establishing Teagasc and is not concerned with day-to-day operations. The Teagasc authority agreed a major change programme earlier this year to reorganise and refocus the organisation to meet the significant challenges that lie ahead. The planned programme has a medium-term implementation timeframe and provides for rationalisation measures across the organisation, including the advisory office and educational networks, disposal of land resources and prioritisation of programme activities. As part of the programme, Teagasc also plans to increase support for science-based innovation in the bio-sector and increase emphasis on transferring knowledge to farmers, the food industry and other clients.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: I asked this question, given that Teagasc’s procedures and operations have already been reviewed. I do not doubt that the recommendations will be implemented. However, the McCarthy report states that there is scope for reducing Teagasc’s staff numbers by a minimum of 250 in the short term by rationalisation of agricultural colleges and locations, reducing lower priority advisory and research activities, reducing administration and advisory services, the latter by 50%, reducing education and training functions by 30% and 20%, respectively, by 2011 and reviewing the network of offices.

If the economy is to get back on its feet, the research, administrative and support services provided by Teagasc will be necessary to ensure people operating in the rural economy have the advantage they require. I strongly suggest that the Minister of State should defend the services operated by Teagasc, particularly scientific research where McCarthy proposes that all research should be codified in one body. This will not necessarily assist in agricultural or agribusiness-related research and this should be revised and reviewed.

With regard to those people who are employed by Teagasc in the agricultural colleges, a question arises about their future if this report is implemented. I agree there is a budgetary [78]process in train but I ask that this area be defended. If it is not defended, and we see post-budget in 2009 and 2010 a further reduction or diminution in the services operated by Teagasc, it will have untold consequences for the rural economy which we will not stand over.

Deputy Tony Killeen: The remit of Teagasc is very wide, as Deputy Sherlock rightly said. Considerable emphasis is being placed on co-operation with other third level colleges and universities with regard to research, but also co-operation on development with agrifood businesses both in this country and abroad. A substantial element of the programme of Teagasc in the revised programme will be directing some of its resources to that area. Considerable resources are also dedicated to training farmers and others with an involvement in the agrifood and bio sectors and this will continue — in many instances, in co-operation with some of the third level colleges, such as the institutes of technology in particular.

Deputy Michael Creed: The revised programme for Government contains a proposal to recruit in the region of 1,000 third level graduates across various Departments. Does the Minister of State not consider it somewhat contradictory that Teagasc staff who have accumulated great expertise and who are, by and large, third level graduates may well be made redundant, but others will be recruited? I ask the Minister of State to comment on this proposal in the revised programme for Government.

Deputy Tony Killeen: As I explained, the Minister’s role is a policy one; the board of Teagasc has a particular role. The document which sets out the remit and functions of Teagasc to 2030 considers issues and areas referred to by Deputy Creed and previously by Deputy Sherlock. It charts a course for Teagasc which clearly includes an input from recently qualified graduates and others who have a contribution to make. It also sets out a strong and inherent role for Teagasc at a new level which must be attained very quickly. I am satisfied the role of Teagasc as set out by its board has the capacity to achieve this.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: I tabled a question on the public service numbers and expenditure programme. This report was sanctioned by Government and makes specific recommendations. When I ask about these specific recommendations, with all due respect to those Ministers, I get blasé, bland answers about the wonderful role of Teagasc. My questions are pertinent to what is in the report. I want to know whether those services will be defended; I do not want an answer that hides behind the budgetary process which is still a long way off. We want definitive answers. I ask those questions on behalf of those people who live in rural Ireland, who live beyond the so-called Pale, and who depend on these services.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: A final reply from the Minister of State.

Deputy Tony Killeen: Members will be aware the report has been presented to Government but has not in any sense been sanctioned by it at this stage. The consideration of the report can only happen in any realistic sense in the context of the consideration of the budgets for 2010, 2011 and subsequent years. There is no other way it could be done. The governance of Teagasc is, in the first instance, the responsibility of the board and a particular direction has been taken which takes account of the implications of the agrifood sector both nationally and internationally. I commend Teagasc in that regard.

7. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the outcome [79]of recent meetings of EU Agriculture Ministers, including the special meeting in Brussels in early October 2009, in relation to the dairy market, both in Ireland and in the EU; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36057/09]

Deputy Brendan Smith: The dairy market has been discussed at Council of Ministers meetings every month since March this year. At these meetings, my ministerial colleagues and I have continually pressed the Commission to take all appropriate measures to deal with the situation and this has helped to stabilise the market. The measures taken this year include the restoration of export refunds for dairy products and these were increased twice in June. Intervention for butter and skimmed milk powder has continued beyond the mandatory fixed limits. In July, it was agreed to implement a special measure to extend intervention beyond August to February 2010 and to 2011, if necessary. This provision will be formally adopted at the October Council meeting which will be held in Luxembourg next Monday and Tuesday.

At the last formal Council meeting in September, the Commissioner presented the dairy market report which set out some options for the sector. At that meeting, I joined Ministers from 15 other member states in seeking major improvements in support for hard-pressed dairy farmers. We signed a statement calling for a comprehensive EU approach that would combine immediate short-term measures along with a medium-term strategy to deal with volatility in the milk sector. I attended a special Council meeting last week to look at medium to long-term measures for the dairy sector. At that meeting it was agreed to set up a high level group of member states, chaired by the Commission’s agriculture director general, to examine the type of arrangements to be put in place.

The high level group will examine medium and long-term ways of stabilising dairy farmers’ incomes and improving market transparency. In its work towards delivering a comprehensive report by June 2010, the group will examine means through which contractual arrangements in the supply chain can contribute to the highest possible returns for producers, giving them more bargaining power in the process and providing a buffer against extremes of market volatility such as those being experienced at present. It will also examine existing market instruments and consider what other means, including a dairy futures market, could contribute to the objective of price stability in the longer term.

Last week, I announced the establishment of a consultative group to advise me on the issues emerging at the high level group. In particular, the ideas, knowledge and expert opinion of the Irish dairy sector will provide key perspectives on how the sector needs to be developed and supported into the future. The consultative group will be representative of all the stakeholders and I will be asking all the main organisations to nominate representatives and these arrangements are being put in place at present.

I also welcomed the commitment given by Commissioner Fischer Boel at last week’s special Council to manage the release of stocks from intervention in a prudent manner.

Deputy Michael Creed: I am glad the Minister had the opportunity to read the last sentence of his reply because I intended asking him, in view of the delicate recovery under way in global dairy prices, what assurances he has been given that products now in intervention arising from efforts at EU level to support the industry will not be prematurely released back onto the market, thereby bringing the recovery to a halt.

In light of that recovery, has the Minister and his Department any estimate of to what level milk prices per litre will return in 2010? Dairy farmers have taken a particular hammering and [80]are anxious to budget and plan for 2010. What price on average does the Minister expect for milk in 2010?

The Minister and his Department have frittered away the dairy investment fund with no strategic objectives achieved in terms of efficiencies in the dairy processing sector. How does the Department, either directly or by means of other State agencies such as Enterprise Ireland, propose to assist in the endeavours under way to bring greater efficiencies to the dairy processing sector?

Deputy Brendan Smith: With regard to Deputy Creed’s last point, I do not accept that the dairy investment fund was not worthwhile. It was exceptionally worthwhile and in many instances——

Deputy Michael Creed: It was frittered away.

Deputy Brendan Smith: It was not frittered away.

Deputy Michael Creed: There was no strategic objective at all.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Allow the Minister to reply.

Deputy Brendan Smith: Perhaps Deputy Creed and his colleagues could identify——

Deputy Michael Creed: A bit around the Border maybe.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Please allow the Minister. Deputy Creed stated his question without interruption and he should allow the Minister to state his reply without interruption.

Deputy Brendan Smith: In response to Deputy Creed’s last point, I do not think that any of colleagues up in my constituency would disagree with giving grant aid to Lakeland Dairies for a very substantial and worthwhile investment at their Bailieboro plant.

Deputy Michael Creed: The Minister should have a chat with the dairy farmers up there.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Please, Deputy Creed.

Deputy Brendan Smith: Lakeland Dairies is not paying the worst price, unfortunately, as there are prices below what it is paying. The investment being put into the Bailieboro plant is very worthwhile and will create greater efficiencies. Greater production and efficiencies go back to the individual primary producer. I was in north Cork, Deputy Creed’s county, with Dairygold and I saw very worthwhile investment there. Very worthwhile investments have been made throughout the country. All applications were adjudicated upon and went through a thorough analysis on the benefits they would bring in regard to efficiency and value added new product. I was in Carbery, west Cork also——

Deputy Tom Sheahan: The Deputy received a warm welcome.

Deputy Brendan Smith: Yes I did and I do not mind that. I received a very warm welcome and I saw the great work going on in that plant as well as the supply from its four constituent dairy co-operatives. That investment has been very worthwhile. Naturally, we wish to see greater collaboration and co-operation. In early September, I travelled to Finland and Denmark with the major dairy companies and we met all the major dairy companies there. [81] They outlined to us the rationalisation process they went through, the scale of production issues and the research and development undertaken, to which the Minister of State, Deputy Killeen, referred earlier. There is co-operation between Teagasc in Moore Park and many of the leading research institutes in Scandinavia as well. I am keen for the whole area of collaboration to proceed. There is plenty of scope for efficiencies to be introduced and for new product development as well.

I spoke with the EU Commissioner early in the summer regarding the release of intervention stocks. We also raised the matter at the Council of Ministers meeting. I put it that when the recovery comes there must be a prudent release of intervention stocks in the future, not when the market is recovering because we do not wish to have downward pressure on prices again. That commitment has been given and it was written into a Council decision.

Deputy Michael Creed: What will the price of milk be next year?

Deputy Brendan Smith: I do not know who in the world could answer the question of what price milk will be next year.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: The Agriculture Council will meet next week. Will that meeting give rise to a new regulation regarding a CMO, common market organisation, for milk or dairy, or will the status quo remain for political intervention in the market, given that there is a slight increase in the price and a slight recovery at present? Is the strategy within the European Union to do nothing at present? It is possible a logical strategy would be to wait to see if there will be a further recovery, or will there be further intervention? I did not quite understand the Minister’s original reply.

Deputy Brendan Smith: The intervention by the European Commission since January has involved the activation of market support measures. That is the nature of the support the European Union can give to the dairy sector. The aids to public and private storage were brought forward to 1 January and the other market support measures were activated from March onwards. Normally, they end in August but at the July Council we reached agreement with the Commissioner to continue those measures beyond August. A mechanism is in place now such that should the need arise for the continuation of those measures, they can continue until March 2011. We all hope these measures will not be needed, that there will be buoyancy in the market, that the price will return to the proper level and that those market supports would not be needed. However, the very important decision that will be taken on Monday next is that the Commission will give a formal guarantee that it will release the intervention stocks in future in a prudent manner and that it will not create downward pressure on the market and bring us back to where we were.

Last Monday, I was in Vienna and I met representatives from 19 like-minded member states. We have worked together to put pressure on the Commission to ensure the market support measures would be used to the best possible effect. Some 21 countries including France, Germany, Belgium and many others have signed a declaration that will come before the Council of Ministers next Monday. This will put to bed once and for all the quota issue and it will not be revisited. Baseless arguments have been made in recent months to the effect that the quota increase we received through the Common Agriculture Policy health check one year ago was the cause of the fall in price this year. Nothing could be further from the truth. As a country we are more than 8% under quota.

[82]Another very important step for the medium term is that enhanced measures should be put in place to deal with volatility and we must prepare for the ending of quotas in 2015 as well. That was first decided in 2003 and it was confirmed in the health check of November last year. It was also confirmed in the Heads of Government meeting last June.

8. Deputy John Deasy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his priorities in the negotiations of the Common Agricultural Policy post-2013; the recent discussions he has had with his EU counterparts on future negotiations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36264/09]

Deputy Brendan Smith: A first policy debate on CAP post-2013 took place at the informal Agriculture and Fisheries Council in September last year under the French EU Presidency. The Czech Presidency continued the debate in the first months of 2009, focusing in particular on the issue of direct payments to farmers. The Swedish Presidency programme provides for further discussion later this year concentrating on rural development issues. In addition to these discussions at Council, both my officials and I have engaged with other member states and the Commission bilaterally on the future of the CAP.

My view, expressed at meetings of the Council and bilaterally to my ministerial colleagues, is that we must maintain a strong agricultural production base in the European Union in the future to take account of the challenges ahead in meeting increased demands for food. Any reduction in food production in the EU would be taken up elsewhere, where less efficient production systems exist and would result in a heavier carbon footprint. We must also undertake food production and distribution in a manner that is sustainable in all its dimensions, including economically, socially and environmentally.

There will be major challenges ahead from climate change, increased competition on world and EU markets, the international economic crisis and other factors. We must ensure we have the capacity to cope with the challenges and fully exploit the opportunities as they emerge. To do so our whole sector, from farm to fork, must be highly efficient and competitive. It must also be innovative, producing the products that changing consumer tastes demand and it must be relentlessly focused on quality and safety.

To achieve these objectives, there is a continuing need for an active and appropriately resourced European agricultural policy. That policy must recognise the role that a cohesive agriculture and rural development policy can play in addressing future energy needs, addressing environmental concerns and providing a secure and sustainable food supply in Europe.

I launched a consultation process in July last with stakeholders to obtain their views on what EU agriculture policies would serve Ireland and the EU best in the years to come. I am very pleased with the response received to date and I call on those organisations which have not already made submissions to let me have their views as soon as possible. All submissions received will be carefully examined and will help to inform our position in the very important [83]negotiations that lie ahead. I thank Members of the Oireachtas who have made individual submissions as well.

Deputy Michael Creed: The Minister’s and Department’s publication on the reform of the Common Agriculture Policy seems to favour a move from the current system of support to a flat, area-based payment system. Does the Minister intend to pursue that objective at a European level in negotiations? Does the Minister believe he undermines his own case in that regard by current and proposed further cuts in the area-based payments inflicted on farmers?

Deputy Brendan Smith: No. I point out to Deputy Creed the document we issued was consultative. It was to generate debate and to put out the parameters of the issues to be discussed. We have clearly stated that we have no set views. The point we have outlined strongly, clearly and consistently in Europe is that we must have a well-funded CAP. We will not tolerate the weakening of the European Union’s food production base. We must meet the challenges.

Food production must be doubled by 2050 and there are climate change issues and those of the protection of the environment. I have reiterated the point consistently in Europe and I fervently believe that if we were to lessen or weaken the food production base in Europe which, by definition, is a very efficient system, it would shift the demand for more food production to less efficient systems in continents far away from us. Such a shift in demand would lead to deforestation, production of food in less efficient systems and the transport of food throughout the world. The end result of this would be an increase in the carbon footprint. We sent out the document during the summer and I appreciate Deputy Creed’s response, that of other Members and that of many organisations. The purpose of the document was to initiate discussion and debate. We have not given any indication that we want to move from the single payment supported scheme to a flat base system. We have not indicated that to any extent whatsoever. In the CAP health check, a consultative committee worked closely with my Department. We will again be establishing a consultative committee representative of all interest groups to work on devising proposals well in advance of the serious discussions that will commence.

Deputy Seán Sherlock: Environmental measures, such as water management, will become more prevalent under the CAP in future. The question concerns the administrative functions. There is a suggestion afoot that we will move from pillar one to pillar two and that, instead of direct payments to farmers for management of the economy, it will be administered through various local organisations. That danger is there, so the question needs to be addressed. It may not be a real fear, but it is something that needs to be addressed. I would like to hear the Minister’s view on that in the first instance.

Second, as regards carbon reduction, at some stage there will have to be an internal debate between the Minister, Deputy Smith, and the Minister of State, Deputy Sargent, as to whether methane reduction will become an issue if the process of carbon reduction becomes part of the CAP regime. The climate change agenda is also on the cards, given the forthcoming UN conference in Copenhagen in December. How will we get to a situation where we do not compromise production or market share, while meeting future demands for food, as well as other targets? There will be an internal battle within the Government on that issue. It is something that will arise in the context of the CAP. I would like to get an opinion from the Minister on these questions.

Deputy Brendan Smith: All the points raised by Deputy Sherlock are very important. I do not favour additional funding going to pillar two. Pillar one has been extremely beneficial not just for farmers, but also for protecting the environment and ensuring that Europe has security [84]of food supplies for its citizens. That was the second article of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 and it is as appropriate today as it was for the founding fathers of the EEC. All these issues are being discussed at the Cabinet sub-committee on climate change. The Deputy rightly mentioned the leading research and advisory role of Teagasc, which has done phenomenal research work for my Department. It works closely with the Department’s inspectorate on what is achievable. Together with New Zealand’s farmers, Ireland’s agricultural sector is regarded as having one of the most efficient food production systems in the world. Therefore we cannot reduce methane gas emissions that much. A lot of research has gone into the dietary requirements of animals, including grass breeding as well as animal breeding. There has been phenomenal progress in that regard.

Deputy Andrew Doyle: Going back to Deputy Sherlock’s first point, can we take that as a commitment and not a negotiable point — that the CAP will be based on pillar one on the basis that food production needs to double by 2020?

Deputy Brendan Smith: Yes, but it is by 2050.

Deputy Andrew Doyle: Otherwise the CAP will be about issuing food coupons to consumers. That is what will happen. Is the commitment non-negotiable?

Deputy Brendan Smith: I cannot give a commitment for the other 26 member states of the European Union.

Deputy Andrew Doyle: The Minister can do so for Ireland, however.

Deputy Brendan Smith: Absolutely. My commitment is to pillar one. I have outlined that very clearly at every opportunity we have had to discuss the future of the Common Agricultural Policy post-2013.

Written Answers follow Adjournment Debate.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: I wish to advise the House of the following matters in respect of which notice has been given under Standing Order 21 and the name of the Member in each case: (1) Deputy James Reilly — the need for remedial safety works to be undertaken at Ward Cross, County Dublin; (2) Deputy Michael D. Higgins — the ongoing industrial dispute at Coca Cola; (3) Deputy Joe Costello — the provision of a permanent school building for Gael Scoil Bharra, Cabra, Dublin 7; (4) Deputy Lucinda Creighton — the safe and secure custody of prisoners at Mountjoy Prison, Dublin; (5) Deputy Mary Upton — the maintaining of facilities and services at Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children in Crumlin, Dublin; (6) Deputy Alan Shatter — the implementation of the recommendations contained in the HSE Report on Services for People with Cystic Fibrosis; (7) Deputy John O’Mahony — the loss of jobs in the motor trade particularly in view of the closure of a car dealership in County Mayo; (8) Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh — the provision of funding to Creativity in the Classroom; and (9) Deputy Fergus O’Dowd — the recent internal report into the verification of results of FÁS test carried out by outside consultants.

The matters raised by Deputies John O’Mahony, Fergus O’Dowd, James Reilly and Joe Costello have been selected for discussion.

Deputy John O’Mahony: I thank the Ceann Comhairle for having selected this issue.

The difficulties in the motor trade have been signalled over the past 12 to 18 months in particular. The solution to them, however, has nothing to do with providing extra finance. If anything, money would come into the Exchequer if this issue was dealt with in a constructive and organised way.

My constituency of Mayo woke up last Tuesday morning to the loss of 70 jobs in Casey’s car dealerships in Ballina and Castlebar. Castlebar accounted for over 45 jobs, while Ballina had over 15. Casey’s was not a company that grew out of the Celtic tiger over the last ten years, but had operated in Mayo for the past 40 years. It has provided hundreds of jobs and sold thousands of cars to the people of Mayo.

I have been discussing the matter with the workforce this week. Over 10% of them have 30 to 40 years’ service with the company. One worker told me that on Tuesday, for the first time in 50 years, he had no work to go to. That says something about the quality of the company and its staff.

The annoying thing about these job losses is that something could have been done to prevent them, but Government inaction led us to this stage. The Government has contributed to the thousands of jobs lost in the motor industry over the last 12 months. Over 60,000 jobs are involved in the motor trade nationwide. Before the recession, in July 2007, the Government introduced an emissions-based tax on cars, which opened the floodgates for imported cars. The Government then increased the VAT rate from 15% to 21%, which further widened the gap. The result, in Mayo alone, cost the Exchequer millions of euro in lost vehicle registration tax or VRT.

In January 2007, some €12 million was paid in VRT by car dealerships in Mayo. At the beginning of this year, however, that sum had fallen to €1 million. For the country as a whole, the sum in 2007 was €2 billion, but it is projected to be €500 million this year. A report by Dr. Peter Bacon recommended that the Government should reduce VRT by 25% in the forthcoming budget. Those are the salient facts and figures.

My assertion is that 15% of a smaller VAT amount is better than 21% of no sales. In 2007, 150,000 cars were sold in Ireland, but this year fewer than 60,000 will be sold. Of the 150,000 cars sold in 2007, 80% were bought with finance released from banks and other financial institutions. Last year, only 10% of the 60,000 sales were based on sales from banks. In other words, buyers had to have the money up front. What is needed now is a package of measures to help protect the thousands of jobs in the motor industry in Ireland. Eleven major dealerships have already gone to the wall in the west this year. Other countries have introduced scrappage schemes that have proved successful, so that could be one element of a solution. The VAT rate needs to be looked at also and finance needs to be released. If the Government continues to sit on its hands on this issue, some other company will suffer the fate of Casey’s in Mayo next week. We need urgent action now.

Minister of State at the Department of Education and Science (Deputy Seán Haughey): I thank the Deputy for raising this matter. The Government is aware of the issues facing the motor industry, which are not just restricted to Ireland. The industry has suffered a serious [86]downturn worldwide, which has resulted in catastrophic impacts on some of the world’s largest automobile manufacturers and huge job losses in regions where the industry was a major source of employment in the past.

I was disappointed to learn of the job losses at the company. I am conscious of the effect that the job losses will have on the employees of Casey Garages in Castlebar and Ballina as well as the knock-on effect for their families and their communities. This is a distressing time for those who will lose what, up to the recent the past, had been very secure and rewarding employment. I assure the people concerned that the relevant State agencies will provide every support they can. The priority will be to find alternative employment or re-training for those involved at the earliest opportunity.

The role of FÁS, the State training agency, will be particularly important in assisting those who are to lose their jobs. All FÁS interventions and supports are aimed at assisting people to enhance their skills and enable them to secure employment in these difficult times. In this instance, the agency has been in contact with Casey Motors in Castlebar and Ballina. Seven apprentices are registered with this dealership with five based in Castlebar and two in Ballina. FÁS Services to Business has contacted the apprentices concerned and they have been advised of their position in the context of the continuation of their apprenticeships. Their on-the-job workplace assessment training records are being updated and every effort will be made by FÁS to progress their apprenticeships in the future. Assistance will also be offered by the agency to other employees of the company.

The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment has no specific role in the motor industry. Responsibility for the primary issues of concern to the industry at large fall within the remit of the Departments of Finance and the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, as the Deputy noted. The Minister for Finance confirmed on 14 September 2009 the replacement of the current special scheme governing the VAT treatment of second-hand cars with the new margin scheme on 1 January 2010. This was initially announced in the supplementary budget of April 2009. Under the margin scheme, dealers will account for VAT on their profit margin, that is, on the difference between the cost of acquiring a car and its selling price.

The introduction of the scheme, and changing over from the current special scheme, will bring Ireland into line with the other 25 EU member states that apply the scheme, which was introduced under the EU VAT Directive in 1994. The margin scheme, which will apply from 1 January 2010, is simple and straightforward in that a dealer accounts for VAT on his or her profit margin. If there is no margin, then no VAT liability arises; if there is a positive margin, VAT is charged based on that profit margin. The scheme will also apply in respect of second-hand agricultural machinery. Appropriate transitional arrangements will be introduced to take account of the fact that the move to the scheme will mean dealers will no longer be able to reclaim or deduct the amount of VAT that under the special scheme is taken to be included in the price of the second-hand car at the time of its acquisition by the dealer.

A number of other provisions designed to boost car sales have been introduced by the Department of Finance. These include the measure introduced in the Finance (No. 2) Act 2008 providing partial VAT deductibility — 20% — in respect of the purchase or leasing of business cars in the CO2 emission bands A, B and C registered for VRT purposes on or after 1 January 2009, should assist new car sales. In addition, under the engine size-based VRT system, the average VRT rate paid was 25% of the open market selling price, whereas under the CO2 emissions-related VRT system the average VRT rate paid is 20% to date. Under the new emissions-related VRT system, the average VRT rate being paid has fallen. The Finance (No. [87]2) Act 2008 provides for the pre-examination of vehicles, including used car imports, as a condition of registration with effect from 1 January 2010 and it also provides for the temporary registration, without the payment of VRT, of vehicles brought into the State for a period greater than 42 days.

There has been speculation about the introduction of a scrappage scheme. Taxation issues are considered in the context of the budget, which will be announced on 9 December. As evidenced by the publication of the renewed programme for Government this week, the issue of jobs is at the top of the Government’s agenda. The Government has two objectives for the next two years: to protect existing jobs in the economy of today and to build our capability for the economy of tomorrow. We will support viable but vulnerable businesses and employment in the difficult trading environment and international crisis. We will also assist those who lose their jobs during the downturn. I am confident the strategies being pursued by the Government will bring renewed growth and prosperity to the motor industry and all business sectors in Ireland.

Deputy Fergus O’Dowd: This is a difficult position for the taxpayer to be in because FÁS and its agents run many courses throughout the country and the credibility of the courses run by one company has been drawn into serious question. I work from a redacted document released under the Freedom of Information Act 1997. The most important information I need is the name of the company but I do not have that. However, the company involved provided seven courses at a cost of more than €1 million comprising company fees and trainees’ allowances. Four of the courses were corrupted because the material results were changed; they were fabricated. The credibility of the awarding of the results goes to the heart of the lack of integrity in FÁS and the rottenness in the system from top to bottom.

The fee paid to the company for the four corrupted courses was in excess of €200,000. The fees paid to the FÁS trainees amount to more than €256,000 and, therefore, the cost of these corrupted courses is almost €500,000. Taxpayers’ money was wasted on unfortunate trainees who were conned into thinking they were doing a course. They were not provided with proper materials and did not receive proper results. No audit of the company was conducted, notwithstanding that it had pleaded guilty to FÁS to previously corrupting a course by changing the results. The company said the individual involved had been sacked but it secured a contract for more courses and corrupted the results of those as well.

At the heart of this is an incredible, appalling, disgraceful shame in the running of FÁS. What did the Minister know about this and similar courses? What steps has she taken to recover the money from the company? What other courses was the company retained to provide elsewhere in the country? This case refers only to the north east. Perhaps this happened elsewhere. The integrity of the certification of City & Guilds courses, which are important nationally and internationally, and FETAC courses must be restored. Every FÁS course must be audited from now on. Has the Department conducted other internal audits to establish whether this is an issue throughout the State?

FÁS has a budget in excess of €1 billion per annum. How much more of taxpayers’ money has been wasted? What action has the Minister taken? What briefings has she been given about this issue? More than 440,000 people are unemployed, many of whom will participate in FÁS courses and receive certification. Independent audits need to carried out on the content of these courses, the results awarded and the computers. In the case to which I refer, the computers the trainees were using were clapped out. They had no printers or disks. The trainees were subject [88]to the biggest con in FÁS and probably one of the biggest cons in history resulting in the waste of taxpayers’ money.

5 o’clock

Fundamental and total reform of FÁS is at the heart of this. Independent accreditation of all examinations is required in order that most of the 440,000 unemployed people who take up the agency’s courses can be certain they will get what it says on the tin and they will participate in the course they were supposed to with access to appropriate materials and computers that work. They should not get results that are designed to suit the company and not the taxpayer. Approximately €0.5 million of taxpayers’ money has been wasted on a course the results of which were fabricated and with the knowledge that this company was already doing it. FÁS knew it was doing this and yet it gave this company other courses. That is the crime at the heart of this issue.

Deputy Seán Haughey: I thank the Deputy for raising this matter. Even though FÁS will either provide itself or contract with private firms for the training of over 100,000 learners in 2009, it is the Tánaiste’s view and, I am sure, the view of all Members of the House that it is crucial we can have full confidence that each one of those learners has received appropriately certified training. We must ensure, therefore, that our system of training and its certification is robust and secure.

We must also ensure that we spend scarce public resources appropriately to ensure we get maximum value for every euro we spend on training, whether it is directly provided by FÁS or contracted out to private firms.

Deputy Fergus O’Dowd: They have more courses.

Deputy Seán Haughey: I would like to point out that in the specific events in 2006 and 2007 described in the internal audit report——

Deputy Fergus O’Dowd: This is a joke. They still have contracts.

Acting Chairman (Deputy Michael Kennedy): Deputy, please allow the Minister to continue.

Deputy Seán Haughey: I ask the Deputy to let me conclude my remarks and we can consider the matter further.

I would like to point out that in the specific events in 2006 and 2007 described in the internal audit report to which the Deputy has referred, it was FÁS itself that discovered there were issues regarding inappropriate certification of training provided in the north east by this private firm. FÁS ensured that a comprehensive audit was undertaken into these activities and this was completed in February 2009. This audit concluded that, in regard to four contracts in the north east and Dublin North, assessment material had been manipulated and that the certification process had been undermined. To maintain the integrity of the training provided and ensure that trainees were not prejudiced by the actions of this private firm, where necessary, FÁS had the relevant trainees retrained and re-assessed and the certifying bodies were satisfied to issue the appropriate certifications.

The Tánaiste understands from FÁS that in respect of one of the courses the private firm paid for the retraining but in respect of another of the courses, the cost of retraining has to date been borne by FÁS. The Tánaiste has instructed her Department to ask FÁS to consider to what extent it can recover from the private firm the cost of this retraining and recertifying the trainees.

[89]The Tánaiste also understands from FÁS that while the internal audit was under way and the report was being prepared, existing contracts between FÁS and this private firm were not terminated as FÁS believed it did not yet have a legal basis to do so. The last training course provided by this firm to FÁS finished on 10 April 2009. The firm does not currently have any training contracts with FÁS.

The Tánaiste believes it important to tell the House that FÁS has identified a number of other current potential certification issues in the north-east region in respect of other courses. Certificates have not issued pending a review of the relevant assessments, which is currently under way. FÁS has indicated that it will undertake a review of all current contracted training courses to ensure they are fully compliant. It will also implement a plan that it has developed to improve its capabilities in assessing, certifying and quality assuring our training interventions. In addition, FÁS is finalising a new form of contract which will be utilised for all future training contracts and will have strengthened clauses on specific performance and sanctions regarding any non-compliance which emerges.

The Tánaiste has instructed her Department to write to the director general of FÁS to seek clarification as to why, in the light of the private firm’s acceptance in April 2007 that assessment material had been manipulated on one contract, FÁS and the private firm did not ensure that the same thing did not occur on subsequent contracts; whether FÁS can recover from the private firm the cost of retraining and recertifying the trainees; whether FÁS intends to establish if there is a basis for seeking to have this firm removed from the FÁS-EI National Register of Trainers; and the other action FÁS is taking to ensure that events of this nature cannot recur. FÁS has advised that the integrity of FÁS training products, processes and quality will be a central element in the new corporate strategy and plan for the organisation.

Continued confidence in our system of training and its certification is paramount and it is essential that FÁS has robust procedures in place. In this case the internal audit procedure within the organisation worked well in identifying and addressing a problem case.

Deputy James Reilly: I am sure the Acting Chairman, Deputy Kennedy, will have an interest in this area. When I was canvassing for the Lisbon treaty I came across two ladies in Swords out for a walk. They informed me that their sister had sadly passed away as a result of an accident at Ward Cross. Ward Cross is a very busy intersection and they told me that 40 fatalities have occurred at that crossroads over the years and hundreds of others have been injured and maimed. As a result they have determined that this matter should no longer go unaddressed. They have been campaigning vigorously and bravely, given the circumstances they find themselves in having suffered such a loss. I commend them on that.

I am aware this matter has been raised at Fingal County Council and the council has addressed the issue in so far as it can do so. It has a plan in place for the introduction of anti-skid surfacing, a new roundabout, signage and road works to ensure better visual aspects to allow people see traffic coming towards them.

The bottom line is that the council needs the funding from central Government and it has not been forthcoming. The application has been made to the Department of Transport under the low cost safety improvement works on regional and local roads for 2010. I hope the Minister, in his reply, will be able to give us an undertaking that the money will be forthcoming and that no more lives will be lost needlessly and tragically at this intersection and that with the improved signage and a roundabout, these terrible tragedies will be a thing of the past.

[90]Deputy Seán Haughey: On behalf of the Minister for Transport, Deputy Dempsey, I wish to thank the Deputy for raising the matter of remedial safety works at Ward Cross, Finglas.

County councils and other major local authorities are responsible for managing and maintaining all regional and local roads in their area. Each year, the Department of Transport assesses the regional and local roads programmes of local authorities and makes grant allocations towards those programmes. The authorities must also commit an appropriate share from their own resources for this purpose, and the road grants we provide are a supplement to those resources.

Fingal County Council has been allocated a total of €5.8 million in regional and local road grants in 2009. While there are no further funds at our disposal from which we could make a special grant allocation to Fingal County Council for remedial safety works at Ward Cross, it is open to the council to fund eligible works at that location from the discretionary improvement grant provided by the Department of Transport or from its own resources. This year, a discretionary improvement grant of €0.215 million has been made to the council. The selection of works to be funded from this grant is a matter for the council.

In May this year, the Department of Transport invited applications from road authorities for funding in 2010 under the low cost safety improvement works scheme of grants. Among the applications submitted by Fingal County Council was a proposal for funding a project at Ward Cross. Fingal County Council may apply to carry out detailed design of their preferred full roundabout project as a low cost measure. It also has the option to apply for specific improvement grant funding in 2010 for the whole scheme at Ward Cross. Alternatively, if a suitable formal application could be submitted, the Department of Transport would be prepared to consider giving approval to the council to proceed with works this year on condition that the scheme would be submitted as a priority in the council’s 2010 specific improvements grant list of road grant applications.

All applications received for funding are considered, having regard to compliance with eligibility criteria, the need to prioritise projects, competing demands from other local authorities and the funds available for the scheme in 2010. Pending the undertaking of improvement works at Ward Cross, the Minister for Transport has been advised that the council has increased the amount of signage, implemented rumble strips, put in anti-skid surfacing, reduced the speed limit from 80 km/h to 60 km/h and provided new road markings. The 2010 grant allocations will be announced early in the new year.

The Dáil adjourned at 5.10 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 20 October 2009.

————————

The following are questions tabled by Members for written response and the ministerial replies as received on the day from the Departments [unrevised].

————————

Questions Nos. 1 to 8, inclusive, answered orally.

9. Deputy Kathleen Lynch asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the cost of the farm waste management scheme in 2010; and if he will confirm that it will be awarded in January 2010 as promised. [36213/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The arrangements for payment of grants under the Farm Waste Management Scheme on a phased basis have been confirmed with 40 per cent being paid this year as claims are approved. A further 40 per cent will be paid in 2010 and the remaining 20 per cent in 2011. I have also announced that a special ex-gratia payment not exceeding 3.5 per cent of the value of the deferred amount will be made to farmers whose Farm Waste Management grants have been partially deferred. This payment will be made in 2011 along with the final instalment. All inspections have now been completed and, to date this year, almost €242 million has been paid out to farmers under the Scheme. It is my intention to pay the second instalment of grant-aid to farmers under the Scheme as early as possible in the new year.

10. Deputy Enda Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the action he has taken to promote the operation of the small scale local abattoir; if he has instructed the Food Safety Authority Ireland to support the development of the small abattoir; the further action he has taken to promote the sale and consumption of locally produced food in local shops other than supermarkets and in Government Departments and agencies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36284/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): My Department has awarded financial support to the small meat sector, which includes small slaughterhouses and low-throughput meat establishments. Following a call for applications in December 2007, and a detailed selection and evaluation process in 2008, a total of €7.8m has been awarded to 31 enterprises. This funding will assist food business operators in the sector to improve efficiency, add quality and value to products, produce new and innovative products and develop new [92]markets. Technical support for artisan meat businesses is also available through a dedicated meat technologist employed by Teagasc. The technologist works with food businesses and Teagasc and other institutes to ensure best knowledge, skills and technology is made available through training, advice and technical support.

As regards the Deputy’s enquiry about the FSAI, I should point out that the FSAI is an independent body (under the aegis of the Minister for Health and Children) whose remit is to ensure that food produced, distributed or marketed in the State meets the highest standards of food safety and hygiene. The FSAI Artisan Forum provides a platform for discussion between artisan food producers and the FSAI, which addresses food safety and hygiene issues for small artisan food producers without compromising legislative requirements and objectives.

Bord Bia, under the aegis of my Department, is the state agency responsible for market development of food, seafood, drink and horticulture at home and abroad. State Aid rules preclude the use of origin to promote products and Bord Bia has a comprehensive set of marketing and promotional programmes in place, which have been developed in consultation with key stakeholders in the food industry, at a local and national level which take account of the State aid restrictions. Bord Bia’s Quality Assurance schemes for products, such as beef, lamb and horticulture, are well known and provide information on origin.

This year Bord Bia has also introduced a “Best in Season” promotional campaign for locally grown produce promotes seasonal local produce. This highlights to consumers which fruit and vegetables are available in Ireland and when they are in season. The key messages include freshness, taste and health benefits. Press and digital media and a best in season website (bestinseason.ie) have focused on strawberries in June, new season potatoes in July and seasonally available vegetables and potatoes in a “back to school” theme for September on emphasising the important role play in a healthy balanced diet for children, particularly as the winter months approach.

The Good Practice Standard and Flag for Farmers’ Markets which was launched by Minister Sargent at the Bloom 2009 Festival encourages farmers markets to provide market access to locally produced in-season produce. Farmer’s Markets, which are active in the local community, promote the development of loyal customer base and are essential in guaranteeing regular cash flow for small businesses. Public Procurement must be in accordance with guidelines set out by the Department of Finance. Interest for local goods generally depends on the financial level of the contract.

11. Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on whether the average income for sheep farmers of €9,000 is an adequate wage; the action he is taking to ensure a viable sheep production industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36293/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The Deputy seems to be referring to the Teagasc National Farm Survey 2008, which shows the average Family Farm Income (FFI) for sheep enterprises was €9,593 last year. The Survey also indicates that sheep farms received an average of €15,816 in direct payments in 2008. In addition, account needs to be taken of off-farm income. More than half of all sheep farms in Ireland were shown to have some form of off-farm employment in 2008.

I have acknowledged previously the particular difficulties being experienced by the Irish sheep sector. The downward pressure on production and demand being experienced by this sector is not unique to Ireland. All of the main sheep-producing countries in Europe and indeed [93]worldwide are facing problems, with reducing flocks, pressure on income and producers leaving the sector. The sector benefits significantly from the main Schemes operated by my Department — the Single Farm Payment, the Disadvantaged Areas Scheme and REPS. I also allocated €7 million from this year’s Single Farm Payment National Reserve to hill sheep farmers, in the form of an Uplands Sheep Payment. It is estimated that some 12,500 hill sheep farmers will benefit from this once off payment. In addition, Bord Bia will spend up to €1 million this year on the promotion of sheep and lamb at home and abroad and Teagasc has allocated almost €1.5 million for sheep research.

The needs of the sector have also been taken into account in deciding how to use the unspent CAP funds for the next three years. Of the €25 million or so available annually, I have decided to allocate €18 million annually to sheep farmers, in the form of a Grassland Scheme. This Scheme will act as a significant support to incomes in the sheep sector. Also, under proposed amendments to the Rural Development Programme Ireland 2007-2013, which has been forwarded to the EU Commission, an indicative figure of €8 million has been allocated for sheep fencing and mobile handling facilities to assist sheep farmers in reducing labour input. A decision from the EU Commission on the amended Programme, including this measure, is expected later this year.

All of these additional supports will be of significant benefit to the sheep sector. In addition, I believe that the report of the Sheep Industry Development Strategy Group — the “Malone Report”— provides an excellent blueprint for the future development of the sector. While most of the group’s recommendations are the responsibility of the industry itself, a number are within the remit of my Department and its state agencies, who have made very good progress in advancing them. Areas of development include:

the establishment of ‘Sheep Ireland’ to take over the Department’s current breed improvement programme and develop a new one;

work on mechanical carcase classification for lamb, which should provide greater price transparency, a pre-requisite for efforts to improve quality and respond to the needs of the market;

the establishment of the Lamb Quality Assurance Scheme in 2007, which is operated by Bord Bia and now has over 7,000 participants; and

a programme developed by Teagasc, for Technology Evaluation and Transfer farms, which will provide an opportunity to engage with sheep farmers on the use of the latest management practices and to identify research and development needs.

While the sector is facing significant challenges at present, I am confident that it will benefit appreciably from the combination of financial support and the actions being taken by my Department, its agencies and the industry, on foot of the Malone report.

12. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the process involved in establishing the newly proposed dairy consultative group, specifically as to the composition of the group. [36220/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Last week I announced my intention to establish a consultative group to advise me on medium and long term measures for the dairy sector. I did this following the special Council of Ministers meeting on the 5th of October, where we had a thorough discussion on the need for measures to manage [94]the dairy market in the period up to and beyond quota abolition in 2015. At that meeting it was agreed to set up a High Level Group of Member States, chaired by the EU Commission’s Agriculture Director General, to examine the type of arrangements to be put in place.

In specific terms, the High level Group will examine medium term and long term ways of stabilising dairy farmers’ incomes and improving market transparency. In its work towards delivering a comprehensive report by June 2010, the Group will examine means through which contractual arrangements in the supply chain can contribute to the highest possible returns for producers, giving them more bargaining power in the process and providing a buffer against extremes of market volatility such as those that are being experienced at present. It will also examine existing market instruments and consider what other means, including a dairy futures market, could contribute to the objective of price stability in the longer term.

As the first meeting of the High Level group took place earlier this week I was anxious to establish a Consultative Group so that I could hear the views of the experts here on issues emerging at the High Level Group. In particular the ideas, knowledge and expert opinion of the Irish dairy sector will provide key perspectives on how the sector needs to be developed and supported into the future. The consultative group will be representative of all the stakeholders and I will be asking the IFA, ICMSA, ICSA, Macra Na Feirme, ICOS, IDIA and IDB to nominate representatives. In addition, Teagasc and academic interest will be invited to participate and these invitations are in the process of being issued.

13. Deputy Seán Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will extend the REP scheme deadline for spreading slurry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36237/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): For participants in REPS 4, the prohibited period for spreading slurry begins on 15 October. The corresponding date laid down in REPS 3 is 31 August, but I announced on 24 August that in view of the exceptional weather conditions during the summer I was bringing this into line with REPS 4. This is the same as the date on which the prohibited period begins for all farmers under the European Communities (Good Agricultural Practice for Protection of Waters) Regulations. These Regulations are a matter in the first instance for my colleague the Minister for Environment, Heritage and Local Government.

14. Deputy Christy O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he expects to submit to the EU Commission Ireland’s position in relation to the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36071/09]

15. Deputy John Cregan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is in a position to respond to the EU Commission Green Paper on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36079/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 14 and 15 together as they cover similar ground.

As you are all probably aware at this stage, the European Commission published a Green Paper last April on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. The launch of this paper was aimed at stimulating broad public debate on the future of the CFP ahead of the next review of the Policy, scheduled for 2012. The Policy, which was first put in place in 1983, has been subject [95]to reviews every 10 years. The most recent review was in 2002. The Commission hopes that the consultation process initiated by the Green Paper will provide feedback from Member States and stakeholders on the CFP that will guide the Commission’s work on the upcoming review of the Policy. All Member States, including Ireland, have been invited to submit written comments by 31 December 2009.

I, along with Minister of State Tony Killeen strongly believe that this review must be informed by the views of our stakeholders, so that a clear and robust Irish position can be developed. Following the publication of the Green Paper, Minister of State Killeen appointed Dr. Noel Cawley to oversee the consultation process with Irish stakeholders. Dr. Cawley is actively seeking the views of all stakeholders in order to ensure that the Irish submission on the reform of the CFP is as detailed and comprehensive as possible. Following advertisements in the National and Fishery Newspapers, a web portal was set up on the Fishing Net website for the public at large to electronically submit their observations on the CFP. I would urge those who wish to contribute to the debate to use this facility so their individual concerns and comments can be considered before our response to the Commission on the Green Paper is finalised.

To discuss the reform of the CFP directly with the fishermen themselves, Minister of State Killeen — along with Dr Cawley — attended a series of meetings around the country at the end of August. He talked with fishermen about what changes they would like to see made to the CFP, and he listened closely to their views as they are best placed to understand the current Policy’s problems and shortcomings. Further meetings involving stakeholders, including processors, environmental NGOs and the aquaculture sector are planned during the next couple of weeks. The outcome of these meetings will be compiled by Dr Cawley into a formal report and this will inform Ireland’s national position during the CFP review.

In addition to these efforts, the Federation of Irish Fishermen (FIF) has undertaken a process to develop its position on the matter. The result of its deliberations will feed into Dr Cawley’s work programme and the formation of Ireland’s position on the review. The FIF held a conference on the CFP review on Friday, 9 October, at the Radisson Hotel, Dublin Airport. At this seminar a large gathering of fishermen from all around the country listened to contributions from a broad range of experienced experts in the field of fisheries.

As I mentioned earlier, our written comments on the reform of the CFP must be submitted to the Commission by the end of the year. The Commission will then publish a summary of its consultations with Member States in 2010. This will be followed by a legislative proposal to the Council and the European Parliament to be adopted in 2011, with a view to its entering into force in 2012. It has been acknowledged across the EU Member States that the current CFP has not worked effectively and that a complete overhaul of the Policy is necessary. We are in full agreement with the view that fisheries management needs to be simplified. New measures are required that will involve fishermen more directly with the Policy while improving its ability to sustain and rebuild the fish stocks upon which our industry is dependant.

From an Irish perspective, our long-term priority is to have a strong, sustainable and profitable seafood industry that supports fishing and related economic activities in our coastal communities. These communities need to maintain jobs in the catching, supply and processing sectors. To do that, they need to maintain their access to the marine resources in our waters. Our coastal communities and family-owned fleet have traditionally been sustained by our available national quotas. Those quotas were granted under the CFP as public goods to the Member States, based on traditional levels of activity in Member States’ fleets and for the purpose of protecting those fleets and those communities. In Ireland these have, over the last quarter century, been distributed as public goods to meet seasonal, regional and local needs of our fleet.

[96]Without access to quotas, our fleet and local fishing ports would wither and die. Therefore, as part of the reform process, we need to ensure that our fishing fleet’s future access to resources is sustained. This access to resources also will need to grow substantially as stocks are rebuilt. It is vitally important that the reform of the CFP does not (as some would want and are actively pressing for) result in large European fishing companies being able to accumulate concentrations of fish quotas and fishing effort to the detriment of family-owned fleets and traditional coastal communities.

While not wanting to pre-empt the outcome of the consultations, our purpose must be to create and retain jobs and industrial opportunities in our Coastal areas. This imperative is doubly important given the current economic climate. I believe that to maintain the social and economic fabric of these communities, quotas and fishing effort should be retained at a national level and in public ownership. Suggestions that promote internationalisation, Individual Transferable Quotas, transferable effort and the concentration of activity amongst large European companies would, I feel, be counter productive and would ultimately result in the loss of jobs for our local coastal economies.

In Ireland, our fishing communities are dependant on all elements of the fleet, both large and small. Hence we do not accept the view put forward by some that only small inshore fleets are socio-economically important and that the larger fleets and the resources they access can be internationalised into a “European” fleet. Indeed, in Ireland a large proportion of onshore employment in the seafood sector is dependant on the largest vessels operating from, and landing into, Irish ports. This is critical in areas such as Donegal and the South West. If those vessels and those quotas were transferred away from the country, or into freezer vessels, Ireland would lose a large part of the economic benefit and jobs it derives from the seafood sector. We will endeavour to protect against this happening in the Reform Process.

Ireland shoulders a large burden in relation to the management and the policing of the CFP in our zone. This was recognised in the founding documents of the CFP, and was set out as a consideration in the unanimous Hague Declaration in 1976 which granted Ireland the Hague Preferences as part of the integral structure of the CFP. In return for this, Ireland gave its support for the extension of the Exclusive Economic Zone’s of the European States to 200 miles, thus enabling the birth of the CFP. In the intervening decades, Ireland has done its part in administering the CFP in our zone. As long as we retain a viable fishing industry, with access to the vital resources in our waters, we will to the best of our ability continue to fully protect and sustain the stocks in our area and administer a reformed CFP that ensures the future prosperity of our seafood sector at sea and on land.

The Reform of the CFP isa major issue for all of Europe and we in Ireland are committed to working closely with the FIF, other stakeholders, our Member State colleagues and the Commission to strengthen the Policy for the betterment of fisheries as a whole and the traditional coastal communities which are dependant on it. We will work to have a Common Fisheries Policy that takes account of the unique structure of the Irish fishing industry.

16. Deputy Mary Alexandra White asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the role of and the functions to be carried out by an Forás Orgánach; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36077/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Forás Orgánach was established to drive forward the development of the organic sector in Ireland. It replaces the National Steering Group for the Organic Sector which completed its second three-year term [97]earlier in 2009. Forás Orgánach was established to build on the work of the National Steering Group and its predecessor, the Organic Development Committee. Forás Orgánach is made up of individuals with expertise in particular areas who can bring their talents and specialist knowledge to the efforts to develop the organic sector further. It is chaired by Mr Noel Groome, Managing Director of Groome’s, a major employer in the fresh food industry. The scope of the group is to provide a platform for progress and change within the organic sector.

The objectives of Forás Orgánach are:

To achieve a targeted increase in conversion to organic production.

To promote organic within the mainstream media.

To highlight the benefits of organic produce to the broader consumer base.

To replace imports with home organic produce.

To promote awareness of the potential export market.

To create business opportunities between the retail/produce sectors.

Forás Orgánach, which has already met twice, has set down a number of goals. These goals include using the current Organic Farming Action Plan to reach the objectives I have just mentioned, and revisiting the plan regularly to reassess its relevance. Expert sub-groups will be set up within Forás Orgánach to carry out specific tasks. There is also a plan to develop a comprehensive document on the business and financial aspects of organic farming.

17. Deputy Kathleen Lynch asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on whether dairy farming here, as currently structured, can compete on the world market; and his further views on the price which will be returned from the world market based on current expert forecasts. [36212/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): As we all know, the international dairy industry is facing serious challenges at present. Markets for dairy products are extremely weak across the world, primarily due to a collapse in demand caused by the global economic downturn. Over the past couple of years we have witnessed extremes of volatility in dairy product prices on an unprecedented scale. During 2007 dairy prices reached record high levels during the international commodity price boom. In 2008 world dairy markets returned to far lower levels and has continued into this year. We have seen the effect of these international low level prices finding their way back through the milk chain to primary producers.

Dairy farmers incomes are comprised of the market price paid for milk and direct income support from the EU. Market forces have a major influence on the price paid to farmers for milk. World market prices determine the returns received by dairy processors and these in turn are reflected in the price paid to farmers. In essence, farm gate prices normally reflect the returns from international markets of dairy product sales. As the milk price is greatly influenced by supply and demand market support schemes can only have a limited effect on prices. For a dairy producing country like Ireland, where we export the vast majority of our product, this new framework is particularly relevant. Ultimately the market is the source of income and to maximise income the focus has to be on competitiveness, efficiency and innovation.

The Common Agricultural Policy contains support measures to help us manage the market. During the Health Check negotiations last year I fought hard to keep the important measures [98]in place. Since the start of the current crisis I have pressed the Commission to use the available market instruments. Most of these supports have now been activated since the beginning of the year and have helped to stabilise the situation. Over the past month there has been comprehensive discussion of the dairy sector at the Council of Ministers. Twenty countries have now signed a statement calling for an EU approach that would combine short term measures with a medium to long term strategy to deal with volatility in the milk sector. At a special Council meeting last week it was agreed to establish a High Level Group to examine the sort of measures that could be put in place. I have decided to set up a consultative group to advise me on the medium and long term measures that will best position the Irish dairy sector for the future.

It is important to remember that the medium term prospects for global dairy markets are good. Growth in wealth and population is forecast to stimulate strong levels of demand for dairy products and returns will improve to all parts of the sector. The Government is committed to ensuring that the Irish dairy sector reaches its full potential. One of the major challenges in the medium term will be to ensure that Irish farming and the agri-food sector is at the heart of an evolving high-value food market, which is focussed on quality and innovation. This is at the core of Government strategy which sets out a series of actions to develop a competitive, innovative and consumer focussed agri food sector.

18. Deputy Shane McEntee asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his plans regarding the reinstatement of the young farmers’ installation aid and early retirement programmes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36287/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The Young Farmers’ Installation Scheme was closed to new applicants on 14 October 2008. I have no immediate plans to reopen entry to this Scheme at this time. I have reopened the Early Retirement Scheme until 30 October 2009 with a view to accepting as many as possible of those applications that were completed or close to completion at the time entry to the scheme was suspended on 14 October 2008.

19. Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the amount of money paid out by him to date to producers and food processors arising from the pork dioxin problem; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36252/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): To date a total of €69m has been paid to pigmeat processors under the Pigmeat Recall Scheme, €30m to primary processors and €39m to secondary processors.

20. Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the various phases of the plans to reorganise his Department’s offices around the country. [36223/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): On 15th July, the Government approved my plan for a reorganisation of my Department’s Local Office Network. The plan involves reducing, from 57 to 16, the number of offices from which the Department will operate District Veterinary, Forestry and Agricultural Environment and Structures support services in the future. Improvements in business processes, information technology and [99]communications will allow the Department to provide a quality service to our clients from the 16 enhanced offices set out in the plan. The first phase of the re-organisation will involve the enhancement of four regional offices, Drumshanbo, Navan, Enniscorthy and Waterford, and consequential office closures in Sligo, Longford, Drogheda, Carlow, Kilkenny, Dundalk, Wicklow and Dungarvan. The schedule and details for the subsequent phases have yet to be finalised.

21. Deputy Niall Blaney asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the measures he has put in place to support young farmers, both in terms of on-farm investment and the allocation of milk quota to new entrants; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36066/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I have made provision of €9.75 million in 2009 to meet existing commitments under the Young Farmers’ Installation Scheme and the preceding equivalent schemes. In addition, I have recently announced my intention to introduce a new range of aid measures in relation to on-farm investments, some of which will be particularly targeted at young farmers. These measures will be introduced as soon as EU approval is received for the measures in question and following agreement on the specific cash-limits available for each measure.

The allocation of milk quota to new entrants to dairying has been a key component of milk policy for some time, and I am glad to say that the long-standing arrangements for making quota available to new entrants under the Milk Quota Trading Scheme have been significantly enhanced recently with the allocation of 200,000 litres of milk quota to 70 new entrants to dairying. As the Deputy will be aware, the first of five annual one per cent increases in quota agreed under last November’s Health Check of the CAP reform became available on 1 April of this year. In addition to using three-quarters of this increase to boost the quotas of active milk producers, I decided that, at a time when the dairy sector is facing many serious challenges, it was more important than ever to make every effort to encourage new thinking and new methods.

All in the industry are agreed on the importance of attracting new blood, so I decided to introduce a new scheme, on a pilot basis, that would make a serious effort to identify people who have a future in dairying and can demonstrate not just their potential but also their commitment to the sector. While the amount of quota that was available was limited, I am satisfied that the 14 million litres that has been allocated under the scheme has gone to high quality applicants, and I look forward to learning of the positive impact they will have on the sector in the coming years. I have also stated my intention to consider, in the context of the availability of a further one per cent of additional quota in 2010, what further potential may be available to expand the eligibility for the scheme to new and recent entrants next year following a review of this scheme.

I should also take the opportunity to emphasise what I alluded to earlier, namely, that the allocation of milk quota to new entrants continues under the Milk Quota Trading Scheme, as it did previously under the Restructuring Scheme. Since the inception of the Trading Scheme in 2007 alone, more than 60 million litres of milk quota has made its way into the hands of young farmers, and they currently have an opportunity to further augment that figure under the latest phase of the Trading Scheme, which closes for applications on 23 October.

22. Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his main [100]areas of interest on the agenda for the Agriculture Council meeting in October 2009 in Luxembourg; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36308/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The next meeting of the Agriculture and Fisheries Council is scheduled to take place on 19th and 20th October. The provisional agenda indicates that it will deal with both agriculture and fisheries items. As regards agriculture, the main item to be discussed is the situation in the dairy market. The Commission proposals on short term measures to address the current crisis in the sector will be presented and discussed. The proposed measures include the extension of the existing emergency powers provision in the single Common Market Organisation Regulation to the milk sector and amending the current rules on quota buy-up schemes to provide for the ring fencing of super levy collected on bought-up quota, for national restructuring measures. The Commission will also present its quarterly report on the dairy market.

The other agriculture item relates to genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The Council will be asked to decide on three proposals on the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize for food and feed and for the same use as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.

In so far as fisheries is concerned, political agreement will be sought on a proposal to establish a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (CFP). Political agreement will also be sought on a Regulation fixing fishing opportunities for fish stocks in the Baltic Sea for 2010 and there will an exchange of views on the EU/Norway annual consultations for 2010. A significant proportion of the Council will be taken up with trilateral meetings on the control Regulation.

All matters discussed at Council are of interest to Ireland and this Council is no exception. I am particularly interested to hear the Commission analysis of the dairy market and I look forward to participating actively in the discussions around the Commission report, the proposals and the situation in the sector in general. Discussions on the dairy sector are not however confined to Council and as well as the usual Council preparatory meetings including the Special Committee on Agriculture, the situation in the dairy sector is being considered at Ministerial level by a group of 21 Member States including Ireland with a view to establishing a common position. In addition a High Level Group mandated to examine the medium to long term future of the EU dairy sector has been established. This Group which had its first meeting on Tuesday of this week will meet monthly between now and next June when it will present its final report. It is also intended to hold consultations with stakeholders starting at the next months meeting.

Equally the fisheries items are of great significance to Ireland and again I will be participating fully in the discussions to ensure the best possible outcome from an Irish perspective. I will be abstaining on the proposals on GMOs.

23. Deputy Deirdre Clune asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the funding which has been made available to fulfil obligations under the early retirement scheme; if farmers with legitimate expectations under the scheme will receive funding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36249/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I have been conscious that a number of applications were completed or close to completion at the time entry to the Early Retirement Scheme was suspended on 14 October 2008. It became apparent recently that there would be a saving on the 2009 allocation for the Scheme. On this basis I took the [101]decision to reopen the Scheme until 30 October with the intention of accepting as many as possible of those applications that were completed or close to completion at the time entry to the scheme was suspended.

24. Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his plans to review the afforestation programme. [36219/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Under the new Programme for Government I am committed to reviewing state forestry policy to take account of its critical role in relation to climate change and its importance to construction, bio-energy, bio-diversity and its potential to deliver long-term employment in other downstream industries. I intend to begin this work as soon as possible.

25. Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on the alternative cost cutting proposals put forward by an organisation (details supplied) in view of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programme report. [36231/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): My Department has received a submission from the organisation named setting out its response to the Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes. The submission will be examined, together with any other submissions that may be received, in determining the budgetary framework and in the preparation of the 2010 Estimate for the Department.

26. Deputy Liz McManus asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the position regarding the animal transport regulation proposals at EU level; and the policy he has adopted regarding same. [36214/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The transport of animals is governed by Council Regulation (EC) 1 of 2005 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations. The Commission is undertaking a review of this legislation but proposals have not yet been put forward by the Commission. In view of the importance of the export trade in live animals, I expressed my concerns to Commissioner Vassiliou regarding any proposals being put forward that would have an adverse affect on our live export trade. I wish to assure the Deputy that I will participate fully in the discussions on any proposals that may emerge to ensure that account is taken of Ireland’s interests.

27. Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the discussions which are taking place with a view to carbon reduction within the agricultural sector. [36227/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Ireland is currently facing two greenhouse gas emission targets. The first of these is the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which limits Ireland’s total national emissions to 13% above the baseline estimate in the Kyoto Period (2008-2012). [102]Ireland’s Agriculture sector will make a very significant contribution to achieving the Kyoto target with emissions from the sector projected to fall by 8.5% on 1990 levels by 2012.

The EU package on climate change and energy security agreed in December 2008 seeks to deliver a 20% reduction in total EU greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 (relative to 1990 levels), increasing to 30% in the event of an international agreement on global emissions reductions and at the same time to increase to 20% the share of renewable energy. As part of the package, the target for Ireland’s non-trading sector emissions, including agriculture, is to reduce emissions by 2020, by an amount equal to a reduction of 20%, relative to 2005 levels. The EPA estimate that emissions from the agriculture sector will fall by over 9% by 2020 on 2005 levels. An in-depth analysis of potential emissions reduction measures for the agriculture sector suggest that further cost effective abatement is limited to 4% of emissions.

To assist the Government in identifying the most appropriate means of achieving Ireland’s non-trading sector target, the cabinet committee on climate change and energy security is examining the emissions reduction potential of the non-trading sector and will report to Government on the optimum alternatives to achieve this goal.

28. Deputy John Cregan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on the EU Commission plans to promote the European aquaculture industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36078/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I welcome the EU Commission’s comprehensive and wide ranging strategy on the Sustainable Development of Community Aquaculture which incorporates the promotion of an environmentally sustainable industry, focused on safety and quality of EU aquaculture production. It is anticipated that the Aquaculture strategy will provide the framework to promote a competitive and diverse aquaculture industry, supported by the most advanced research and technology, covering the whole supply chain and meeting consumer demands in a sustainable manner.

29. Deputy Jimmy Deenihan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the position with regard to on-farm nitrates regulations inspections; if he has come to an agreement with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government to avoid duplication of inspections; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36266/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The Local Authorities are the designated competent authorities for the purposes of the European Communities (Good Agricultural Practice for the Protection of Water) Regulations (SI No. 101 of 2009). However, I have agreed that inspections to meet the requirements of the Nitrates Regulations will be undertaken by my Department. My objective is to ensure that the duplication of on-farm inspections is avoided for practical reasons, to minimise costs and to simplify the inspection arrangements from the farmer’s perspective.

It is envisaged that my Department will carry out inspections on behalf of the Local Authorities. Detailed arrangements, including criteria for farm selection, inspection protocol and cross reporting will be agreed between both Departments, in consultation with the Local Authorities and the Environmental Protection Agency. Inspections to be carried out as part of this new arrangement will be in addition to the existing inspections carried out by my Department.

[103]Discussions are ongoing between officials of my Department, the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and representatives of the Local Authorities to finalise arrangements in relation to these matters. It must be emphasised however that Local Authorities remain the designated competent authorities for the purposes of the Nitrates Regulations. As such, Local Authorities retain duties and powers to investigate pollution incidents and complaints under the Nitrates Regulations.

30. Deputy Pat Breen asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the position regarding the proposal for electronic tagging of sheep; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36240/09]

87. Deputy Tom Sheahan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if the programme for electronic tagging of sheep has been completed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36192/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 30 and 87 together.

The introduction of electronic identification (EID) for sheep was agreed at EU level in late 2003. At that time, it was agreed to defer the implementation date until January 2008. The Council revisited this issue in December 2007 when it was agreed that the deadline for the compulsory introduction of EID should be definitively set for 31 December 2009. I have consistently opposed the mandatory introduction of EID and have sought its introduction across the Irish sheep industry on a voluntary basis. There has, however, been a lack of support from other EU Member States or from the European Commission for a voluntary scheme. In these circumstances, and notwithstanding my opposition to EID, I have had my Department engage with the European Commission and other Member States, in an effort to secure amendments so as to achieve the best implementation conditions for Irish sheep farmers.

I am glad to say that a number of significant concessions that should ease the burden on the sector in implementing EID were recently agreed with the Commission and other Member States. This is an important step in the right direction. I should say that for my part I am anxious that whatever system is finally implemented imposes the least burden possible on the sheep sector.

31. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has engaged in discussions with the Health Service Executive with regard to streamlining food safety monitoring and control; if he has advocated the establishment of the Food Safety Authority as the authority in charge of food safety with all other organisations accountable directly to the FSAI; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36195/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The F.S.A.I. was established by the FSAI Authority of Ireland Act, 1998 under the aegis of Department of Health and Children. Section 11 of that Act assigns overall responsibility for food safety in Ireland to the F.S.A.I. In accordance with the provisions of Section 46 and 48 of the Act, my Department carries out functions under service contract acting on behalf of and as an agent for the Authority. I am satisfied that the system of the F.S.A.I. carrying out its functions through service contracts has operated well.

32. Deputy Noel Treacy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the discussions which have taken place at the EU Council of Agriculture Ministers in relation to the Common Agricultural Policy post-2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36069/09]

60. Deputy Noel Treacy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views in relation to the need for a strong well funded Common Agricultural Policy post-2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36068/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 32 and 60 together.

A first policy debate on CAP post 2013 took place at the Informal Agriculture Council in September last year under the French Presidency. The Czech Presidency continued the debate in the first months of 2009, focusing, in particular, on the issue of direct payments to farmers. The Swedish Presidency Programme provides for further discussion later this year, concentrating on rural development issues. In addition to these discussions at Council, both I and my officials have engaged with other Member States and the Commission bilaterally on the future of the CAP.

Notwithstanding the discussions to date, concrete proposals have yet to emerge on the shape of EU agriculture policy beyond 2013. The Commission is expected to bring forward a formal communication in mid 2010 on the future of the CAP, followed by legal proposals in mid 2011. A first round of formal negotiations will commence on the Communication, leading possibly to the agreement of Council Conclusions, while the more intense phase of formal negotiations will commence once the legal proposals are tabled. My own view, which I have expressed at meetings of the Council and bilaterally to my Ministerial colleagues, is that we must maintain a strong agricultural production base in the European Union in the future to take account of the challenges ahead in meeting increased demands for food. Any reduction in food production in the EU would be taken up elsewhere, where less efficient production systems exist, and would result in a heavier carbon footprint. We must also undertake food production and distribution in a manner that is sustainable in all its dimensions — economically, socially and environmentally.

There will be major challenges ahead from climate change, increased competition on world and EU markets, the international economic crisis and other factors. We must ensure that we have the capacity to cope with the challenges and fully exploit the opportunities as they emerge. To do so, our whole sector, from farm to fork, must be highly efficient and competitive. It must also be innovative, producing the products that changing consumer tastes demand, and it must be relentlessly focused on quality and safety.

To achieve these objectives, there is a continuing need for an active and appropriately resourced European agricultural policy. That policy needs to recognise the role that a cohesive agriculture & rural development policy can play in addressing future energy needs, addressing environmental concerns and providing a secure and sustainable food supply in Europe. I launched a consultation process in July last with stakeholders to obtain their views on what EU agriculture policies would serve Ireland and the EU best in the years to come. I am very pleased with the response received to date and I would call on those organisations which have not already made submissions to let me have their views as soon as possible. All submissions received will be carefully examined and will help to inform our position in the very important negotiations that lie ahead.

33. Deputy P. J. Sheehan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the main provisions and aims of the proposed forestry Bill; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36197/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The purpose of the Forestry Bill is to reform and update the legislative framework relating to forestry in order to support the development of a modern forestry sector that enshrines the principles of sustainable forestry management and protection of the environment. The Bill will, among other provisions, introduce a more streamlined felling licensing system, allow for change of land use from forestry to other sustainable uses and provide a statutory basis for Forest Service Guidelines and Forest Management Plans. The Bill itself is currently being drafted by the Parliamentary Draftsman.

34. Deputy Seymour Crawford asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he will publish the report into the pork dioxin contamination issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36258/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The Review Group is considering the report and recommendations of the Joint Oireachtas committee which it received on 26th May 2009 as well as a range of submissions from interested parties. As I advised the Joint Oireachtas Committee I established a Review Group, chaired by Dr. Patrick Wall, to make recommendations on whatever adjustment of controls or other measures are necessary in the light of the experience gained during the dioxin contamination incident. The work of the Group is ongoing and I expect it to report by the end of the month to both the Minister for Health and Children and myself.

35. Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if the 5,000 farmers excluded from the farm improvement scheme in 2007 will be given priority in the recently announced new grant schemes. [36232/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The Farm Improvement Scheme was introduced by my Department in July 2007 with funding of €79 million as agreed under the Partnership Agreement, Towards 2016, and was suspended on 31 October 2007 as applications received had reached this level of funding. 12,675 applications were received from farmers prior to the closing date of the Scheme and these applications have been processed within my Department up to the level of funding available.

The various on-farm investment schemes referred to in my recent announcement will be targeted, however, at specific groups of farmers and applications for grant-aid under these schemes will be subject to both eligibility and assessment criteria in order to determine those which will be approved for grant-aid. Applicants who did not receive approval under the Farm Improvement Scheme will, of course, be eligible to apply for the various aid schemes when they are introduced where they comply with the specific eligibility criteria laid down in the scheme concerned.

36. Deputy Tom Hayes asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on [106]whether the horticultural producer groups are a fundamental part of the horticultural production supply chain; the action he has taken to support producers’ groups and prevent closure; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36279/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): My Department consistently supports the Horticulture sector with its grant aid schemes. The EU Scheme of Aid for Producer Organisations (POs) in the Fruit and Vegetables Sector encourages producers to organise themselves into Producer Organisations (PO) in order to strengthen their position in the market. More flexible terms and conditions were introduced for the PO Scheme from 2008 under Regulations (EC) Nos. 1234/2007 and 1580/2007. My Department has secured nearly €35M in EU Aid for Irish POs for the operational programmes which they implemented between 1999 and 2008. These programmes allow fruit and vegetable growers to implement annually approved business plans to improve the quality and commercial value of their produce and promote the use of environmentally aware cultivation practices.

37. Deputy Niall Blaney asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on whether there is further scope for the allocation of additional quota to young farmers as a result of the outcome of the Common Agricultural Policy health check; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36067/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): When I announced recently the allocation of milk quota to 70 new entrants to dairying, which arose from the first of five annual increases of one per cent in milk quotas agreed under the CAP Health Check, I stated my intention to consider what further scope might be available to allocate quota to young farmers when the next one per cent falls due for allocation in 2010. This process will be informed by a full review of the operation of this year’s scheme, which will be conducted in the coming months.

38. Deputy John O’Mahony asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the progress made on the plans to provide high rope adventure courses in forests here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36303/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Following approaches from a number of potential aerial trail operators interested in operating such facilities on Coillte lands, the company examined the issue of locating aerial trail adventure systems in a small number of appropriate locations across the country. An operator was chosen as the preferred operator and planning permission was granted to operate such a facility at Lough Key Forest Park. However, the preferred operator has since indicated that, due to changed financial circumstances, it will not be taking up the option. I understand from Coillte that it will therefore re-advertise for expressions of interest from operators who may be interested in operating aerial trails on its lands.

39. Deputy Seán Connick asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the role he envisages of a sustainable food and agricultural policy in addressing the inter-related global challenges of climate change, population growth and water scarcity; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36075/09]

[107]

75. Deputy Seán Connick asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on the need to develop an overall EU strategy to address the twin challenge of achieving food security and dealing effectively with climate change; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36074/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 39 and 75 together.

The Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change aims to finalise an international agreement on global greenhouse gas emissions reductions in Copenhagen in December. The Government supports the EU commitments to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions to at least 20% below 1990 levels by 2020 and to scale up this reduction to as much as 30% as part of a new global climate change agreement.

At the same time the international community is committed to reducing by half the number of malnourished people in the world by 2015, but the latest estimates from the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations show that the number of hungry people could actually increase by a further 100 million in 2009 and pass the one billion mark. For this reason the World Summit on Food Security will be held in Rome in November to consider the actions that must be taken to reduce and eradicate hunger. Ireland strongly supports the international effort to eradicate hunger and believes that we must significantly intensify our efforts in this regard.

United Nations projections suggest that the world population will rise from the current 6.8 billion to 9.2 billion by 2050, with an associated 70% increase in demand for food. At the same time, more than ever, food production is facing competition for land and water resources due to the increasing demand for crops for the production of bioenergy and from urban development. I am concerned at the scale of these challenges, and I believe that there needs to be greater attention on how best to reconcile the twin objectives of reducing greenhouse gas emission while increasing food production and improving access to food. Reconciling these objectives is vital for our collective futures, but presents significant challenges that need to be addressed directly and jointly.

At the Council of Agriculture Ministers in September 2008 and again in July and September 2009, I raised the challenge of reconciling climate change targets with our regional and global food security objectives. We have also repeatedly highlighted this issue in EU and UN discussions leading up the Copenhagen conference. I believe that our efforts are having some impact that there is now growing awareness of this issue.

As well as contributing to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to unavoidable changes to our climate, agriculture must also deliver other major environmental priorities. These include, maintaining a high level of biodiversity, helping to preserve natural habitats and the protection of endangered species. In my view, sustainable agricultural production, sustainable land use and land use management is the key to achieving these priorities. Coherent EU and UN policy on these matters is important in the context of any agreement at Copenhagen and in the long term beyond 2020.

40. Deputy Máire Hoctor asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his spending proposals for the use of the unspent single payment scheme funds, announced in the context of a revised rural development programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36065/09]

[108]Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Under the agreement reached in November 2008 on the Health Check of the CAP, I secured approval to use previously inaccessible unspent Single Payment Scheme funds to address, among other things, specific disadvantages affecting certain sectors in economically vulnerable or environmentally sensitive areas. Member states may also provide support to farmers for specific agricultural activities providing agri-environmental benefits.

Resulting from this agreement Ireland gained access to in the region of €25 million in additional funding for each of the next three years 2010, 2011 and 2012 for these targeted measures. In considering how these moneys might be best spent my objective was to achieve the most effective and efficient outcome for Irish agriculture. With this in mind and having consulted widely with all relevant stakeholders including the farming organisations and having regard to the provisions of the regulations, I decided to allocate the available funds as follows: €18 million each year for the next three years on a grassland scheme to support incomes in the sheep sector, €6 million each year for the next three years on a grassland dairy efficiency programme aimed at encouraging a significant improvement in efficiencies on dairy farms, and €1 million for each of the three years 2010, 2011 and 2012 to support high environmental value farming, with tourism spin-off, in the Burren, County Clare, continuing and mainstreaming the pilot scheme operated by the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government.

In addition to this agreement I successfully negotiated for the use of the national reserve element of these funds from 2009. In this regard I have already announced that approximately €7 million will be paid to hill sheep farmers as a once off payment in the form of an uplands sheep payment, benefiting approximately 12,500 hill sheep farmers.

41. Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason for the reported 15,000 queried applications in respect of single farm payment. [36226/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Agreement was reached in the Council of Ministers in June to allow for an advance of the single payment scheme payments to begin issuing on 16 October, a full six weeks earlier than the 1 December commencement date provided for under the rules of the scheme. As well as earlier payments, the level set for the amount of the advance payable was set at an unprecedented 70%. While some member states are not in a position to make advance payments, this is not the case in Ireland and I can confirm that arrangements are in place for the commencement of these payments in accordance with this very welcome concession and payments will begin to issue to applicants’ accounts over the coming days. The 30% balancing payments will begin to issue with effect from 1 December.

Approximately 123,700 applications were submitted to my Department under the 2009 single payment scheme. At least 92% of these applications, worth over €800 million, are now fully clear for the first payment run on 16 October. My Department is continuing to process applications and I have made arrangements for further frequent payment runs to ensure that newly finalised applications are paid without delay.

In order to ensure that payments under the single payment scheme are maximised between now and the end of 2009, I would take this opportunity to urge all applicants who have received queries from my Department in connection with their application to respond as a matter of urgency with the necessary clarifications.

42. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will [109]investigate the possibility of re-establishing the sugar beet industry here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36185/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): As part of the reform of the EU sugar regime in 2006, a temporary restructuring scheme was introduced with the aim of reducing EU sugar production in order to comply with WTO and other international obligations. The scheme provided an incentive for sugar processors to renounce sugar quota and dismantle the associated sugar processing plant and it provided compensation for affected stakeholders. Greencore, the sole Irish sugar processor and holder of the entire Irish quota allocation, decided to avail of this scheme and accordingly the company renounced the quota and dismantled the last remaining Irish sugar factory at Mallow in compliance with the conditions of the scheme. This brought the Irish sugar industry to an end. The stakeholders concerned have now received their compensation payments in full.

As a result of the restructuring scheme the overall EU sugar quota was reduced by almost 6 million tonnes, of which the Irish quota contributed some 200,000 tonnes. Any proposal to review the EU sugar quota would be a matter for the EU Commission in the first instance and any proposal to re-establish a sugar factory in Ireland would, subject to the availability of quota, be a matter for commercial decision by interested parties.

43. Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the steps he will take to assist dairy farmers here, in the grip of the worst cash flow and income crisis in a generation, bearing in mind that many of their European counterparts have been helped by their Governments, with low or no-cost loans, excise reductions on fuel, or lower social security contributions, financed using the permission by the EU Commission to use the higher de minimis state aids provision up to €15,000 per farmer over three years. [36217/09]

47. Deputy Charles Flanagan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the initiatives he will introduce to bring about greater efficiency in the dairy sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36274/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 42 and 47 together.

In July I announced proposals for the spending of more than €200 million on new investment measures in Irish agriculture as part of a revised rural development programme. These included the allocation, from unspent single payment scheme funds, of €6 million per annum for the next three years to a scheme to encourage a significant improvement in efficiency on dairy farms. In addition, €45 million has been earmarked for an investment support scheme aimed at helping young dairy farmers to adjust to expanding dairy opportunities and make their commercial operations more cost-effective. Details of both of these schemes are currently being drawn up by my Department.

[110]Over the past month there has been comprehensive discussion of the dairy sector at the Council of Ministers. Twenty ministers, including myself, have now signed a statement calling for an EU approach that would combine short term measures with a medium to long term strategy to deal with volatility in the milk sector. We met in Vienna earlier this week where we agreed on new measures to be implemented in the sector. Specifically, we will be asking the Commission to commit to an additional €300 million for the 2010 budget, without prejudice to other sectors.

44. Deputy Bernard Allen asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if the operational programme for fisheries has been finalised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36193/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The National Seafood Development Operational Programme 2007-2013, which provides for grant aid support to develop the aquaculture industry, was advertised for public consultation in October 2008. Following this consultation process issues were raised by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources on behalf of Central Fisheries Board (CFB) regarding the grant-aiding of projects where environmental issues arise relating to compliance with the EU Birds and Habitats Directives and sea lice control on salmon farms.

This Department with its agencies working with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (DEHLG) developed a plan to deliver compliance with the EU Birds and Habitat directives for wild fisheries and aquaculture over a determined timeframe. This plan was submitted to DG Environment for consideration. While substantial progress has been made in securing the agreement of DG Environment to the provisions of the plan which has been the subject of detailed discussions, DG Environment has not formally signed off on the plan. My officials will continue to work closely with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government with a view to giving them the assurances that will allow them to withdraw their objections to the Operational Programme.

A meeting at ministerial level was held in June between my Department and the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. I advised on the significant progress made in relation to managing sea lice levels on salmon farms and the concerns of the Fishery Boards were also set down. I am hopeful that there is a better understanding of the issues involved from both Departments’ perspectives and that on this basis we can find a satisfactory resolution to the concerns raised. However, at this time it has not yet been possible to satisfy the concerns of the CFB on sea lice.

I would hope to be able to approve the OP once all issues raised have been dealt with and that both the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources are satisfied with the progress made on the issues arising.

45. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the role played by Irish laboratories and UK laboratories in the recent outbreak of equine piorplasmosis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36190/09]

[111]

62. Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the situation regarding the status of equine piroplasmosis here in view of the outbreak of the disease in September 2009. [36218/09]

84. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the steps taken by him following recent confirmation of occurrence of equine piroplamosis in a number of thoroughbred horses at an equine facility in County Meath; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36072/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 42, 62 and 84 together.

Equine Piroplasmosis is a tick-borne protozoal disease of horses and other equidae that is common in most parts of the world but not normally found in Ireland. Samples submitted by the private veterinary practitioner attached to a racing stable in County Meath to a UK reference laboratory indicated serological positives for piroplasmosis among some of the horses on the holding. My Department was notified of positive laboratory results on three of the horses on 2 of September 2009, following which a full epidemiological investigation was launched. Animals that moved to and from the affected holding were traced and all animals on the affected holding itself along with all traced animals were tested.

Arising from this, a second related holding in County Wicklow was found to be affected and this holding has also been restricted and subject to investigation. In addition to the initial UK testing, further testing and analysis has been carried out in Irish laboratories — either the Irish Equine Centre in Kill, County Kildare or the Central Veterinary Research Laboratory in Backweston. While investigations are ongoing I am hopeful that the incident of piroplasmosis has now abated on the facility in County Meath.

46. Deputy Kieran O’Donnell asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the recent action taken on the traceability of pork products and the labelling of genuine Irish meat products to distinguish them from imported processed meat products; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36299/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The EU regulations on food law require that food business operators have systems in place to be able to identify any person from whom they have been supplied with a food. They must also have a system in place to identify the other businesses to which their product has been supplied. In other words a food business operator at each and every stage in the food chain must be able to identify the source of its inputs as well as having details of the first recipient of its output.

I am satisfied that the meat sector generally is meeting the traceability standards required under this legislation. Nevertheless and following the dioxin contamination incident, my Department, in conjunction with industry, is continuing to examine the potential to improve traceability at processing level. I also established a review group to carry out a comprehensive review of the dioxin contamination incident. This group will make recommendations on whatever adjustments of controls are necessary in the light of the experience gained in dealing with this incident. I expect that this group will cover the issue of traceability in its report.

I have pursued improvements to the labelling of meat and meat products. My Department notified the draft Health (Country of Origin of Poultrymeat, Pigmeat and Sheepmeat) Regulations 2007 to the European Commission in December 2007. These would have required the [112]country of origin of meat to be indicated on the labels of meat and products containing over 70% meat.

Following a series of communications between the European Commission and my Department, the Commission directed Ireland not to adopt the draft national regulations. The main reason for the Commission’s stance was that the proposed regulations did not fulfil the requirements of the EU labelling directive (2000/13/EC) concerning the permissibility of non-harmonised national legislation. It contended that the draft regulations would create a disproportionate obstacle to trade. The Commission view, which is supported by the majority of other member states, is that labelling matters should be dealt with on a harmonised EU basis rather than on an individual national basis.

Ireland is pursuing harmonised EU rules on origin labelling in the context of a proposed EU regulation on the provision of food information to consumers. The Department of Health and Children is the lead Department for that proposal and has been reflecting Ireland’s position at relevant meetings on the subject.

Question No. 47 answered with Question No. 43.

48. Deputy Joe Costello asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the number of farmers penalised under the REP scheme in 2008; the breakdown of this figure; and the reason for the imposition of penalties. [36207/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): There were 3,381 penalties applied to farmers under the REP scheme in 2008. These are listed in the following table. The number of farmers affected is smaller, however, as multiple breaches of the scheme were detected in a number of instances.

Reason	Number
Adjustment for area change	1,294
Any other reason	312
Undertakings in respect of farmyard not carried out as planned	205
Non-compliance with requirements of option 1 (report on tao 1 form)	169
Recommended quantity of lime not applied	143
Quantity of organic N exceeded planned limits by 10% or more	119
Bovines not excluded from wells and watercourses marked blue on map	117
Farm boundaries not stockproofed	94
Hedgerows/stonewalls not maintained as specified in plan	71
Non-compliance with requirements of option 2 (report on tao 1 form)	61
Application lodged 7 working days late	49
Application lodged 1 working day late	48
Quantity of organic N applied not kept within the scheme maximum limit	47
Application lodged 6 working days late	44
Stock not wintered as set out in plan	39
Application lodged 3 working days late	38
Application lodged 8 working days late	35
Application lodged 2 working days late	34
Planned waste storage facilities not provided	33
Application received thereafter	33
Application lodged 5 working days late	30
Application lodged 4 working days late	29
Quantity of chemical P or N exceeded planned limits by more than 10% or scheme limits	28
Planned animal housing facilities not provided	22
Application lodged 9 working days late	22
Record sheets (1 to 7) not completed in accordance with specification	19
Herbicide or chemical/organic fertilisers applied within 1.5m of hedgerows/stone walls/field margins	17
Quantity of chemical P or N exceeded planned limits by =10%	17
Specified conservation/management practices not carried out as detailed on plan	16
Non-compliance with linnet habitat SM5	15
Fences not located the specified distance from wells/watercourses	14
Planned silage storage facilities not provided	13
Listed habitats not retained as specified	13
Field boundaries,hedgerows and stonewalls on map not retained	12
Limits of N (chemical or organic) exceeded	11
Tillage field margins widths not in conformity with reps requirements	10
Application lodged 10 working days late	10
Quantity of N applied exceeded more than 10% of that planned	9
Application lodged 13 working days late	9
Application lodged 11 working days late	7
Application lodged 12 working days late	7
Application lodged 15 working days late	7
Waste discharging into watercourses/drains	6
Non-compliance with traditional Irish orchard SM2	5
Records not kept as prescribed	4
Application lodged 14 working days late	4
Application lodged 16 working days late	4
Application lodged 17 working days late	4
Application lodged 21 working days late	4
Application lodged 24 working days late	4
Non-compliance with long-term setaside (riparian zone) SM4	3
Application lodged 18 working days late	3
Slurry spread during prohibited period	3
Chemical P limit exceeded	2
Application lodged 19 working days late	2
Non-compliance with corncrake SM1	2
Monuments/features not being retained as specified in plan	1
Non-compliance with rare breeds SM3	1
REPS 1A not lodged within specified periods	1
Revised plan not submitted within specified periods	1
Application lodged 20 working days late	1
Non-compliance with stocking limits set out on plan. Limits exceeded by 10-20%	1
Non-compliance with stocking limits set out on plan. Limits exceeded by more than 20%	1
Non-compliance or withdrawal of organic licence SM6	1
Non-compliance with SM6	1

49. Deputy Johnny Brady asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is satisfied with the level of support provided by the EU Commission in relation to the difficult market situation being faced by dairy producers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36059/09]

53. Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the proposals he is putting at EU level to stabilise dairy markets; and the level to which he is proposing to increase the intervention price. [36211/09]

86. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the efforts he has made to secure EU supports for milk producers here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36056/09]

92. Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the guarantees he has secured from the European Commission that intervention stocks of both butter and skimmed milk powder will be firmly held until milk prices have recovered well in excess of break even and only released very carefully and in a manner which ensures it will not disrupt markets. [36216/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 49, 53, 86 and 92 together.

Since the start of 2009 the Commission has reactivated a range of measure provided for in the CAP Health Check, beginning with the early operation of the private storage scheme for butter. Then, in January export refunds were reintroduced to support the export of dairy products outside the EU and these have been increased several times, most recently in June. In March, public intervention schemes for butter and skimmed milk powder were opened which allowed the purchase of product up to set limits at a fixed price. When the mandatory limits of 30,000 tonnes and 109,000 tonnes respectively were purchased at the intervention price the schemes were continued under tendering arrangements at close to the intervention prices. To date some 83,000 tonnes of butter and 282,000 tonnes of skimmed milk powder have been funded under these schemes. Also, 135,000 tonnes of butter has been aided under the private storage scheme, which was extended beyond the August closing date.

In early July the Council of Agriculture Ministers agreed to the use by the Commission of emergency provisions to allow it to extend the intervention periods for butter and skimmed milk powder for 2009 beyond the normal end-August closing dates to 28 February 2010, and to replicate this mechanism in August 2010 if necessary. The Commission has also removed the so-called “free at frontier” threshold price governing the export of cheese from the EU, which I had been pressing the Commissioner to review for some time in bilateral contacts and at meetings of the Council.

Over the past month there has been comprehensive discussion of the dairy sector at the Council of Ministers. Twenty ministers, including myself, have now signed a statement calling for an EU approach that would combine short term measures with a medium to long term [115]strategy to deal with volatility in the milk sector. At a special Council meeting last week it was agreed to establish a High Level Group to examine the sort of measures that could be put in place. That group will report in June 2010, and I have decided to set up a consultative group to advise me on the medium and long term measures that will best position the Irish dairy sector for the future.

I also welcomed the commitment given by Commissioner Fischer Boel at last week’s special Council to manage the release of stocks from Intervention in a prudent manner. We are seeing some tentative signs of an improvement in dairy markets, though a solid recovery is still uncertain and it is crucial that the disposal of stocks from intervention is handled in a sensitive manner and in a way that does not undermine the market at this critical time.

50. Deputy Jim O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has consulted with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in relation to the extension of the time for the spreading of slurry following the extension given to farmers in Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36082/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I consulted with my colleague, the Minister for Environment Heritage and Local Government, Deputy John Gormley, and there is on-going regular contact between officials of both Departments on a number of issues related to the Nitrates Regulations (SI No. 101 of 2009). The prohibited period for the spreading of slurry commences on 15 October in all parts of the country as required by the Nitrates Regulations. These regulations are a matter in the first instance for my colleague the Minister for Environment, Heritage and Local Government.

The planned review of Ireland’s Nitrates Action Programme in 2010 will provide an opportunity for all stakeholders to put forward their views on the question of the most appropriate dates for the prohibited periods for spreading fertilisers that are a mandatory requirement under the EU Nitrates Directive. Any adjustment to Ireland’s Nitrates Action Programme will require the agreement of the EU Commission.

51. Deputy Seán Fleming asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if additional funding will be provided in 2010 to assist the sheep sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36073/09]

91. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the steps he is taking to support the sheep industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36080/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 51 and 91 together.

The sheep sector is already a significant beneficiary from the main schemes operated by my Department, which include the single farm payment, the disadvantaged areas scheme and REPS. In recognition of the difficulties faced by this sector, I have also allocated €7 million from this year’s single farm payment national reserve to hill sheep farmers, in the form of an uplands sheep payment. Moreover, Bord Bia will spend up to €1 million this year on the promotion of sheep and lamb at home and abroad and Teagasc has allocated almost €1.5 million for sheep research.

[116]The Deputies will also be aware that under the final agreement on the CAP Health Check, Ireland will have access to additional funds of the order of €25 million annually from unspent CAP funds for three years from 2010 onwards. I decided to allocate €18 million of this funding annually, from 2010 to 2012 inclusive, to sheep farmers, in the form of a grassland scheme. In addition, under proposed amendments to the Rural Development Programme Ireland 2007-2013, which has been forwarded to the EU Commission, an indicative figure of €8 million has been allocated for sheep fencing and mobile handling facilities to assist sheep farmers in reducing labour input. A decision from the EU Commission on the amended Programme, including this measure, is expected later this year.

Further steps to support the industry, centre on the recommendations of the Sheep Industry Development Strategy Group, which I believe provides a clear framework for progress. While the responsibility for implementing most of the group’s recommendations fall on the industry itself, a number are within the remit of my Department and the state agencies under its aegis, who have made clear progress in implementing them.

‘Sheep Ireland’ has been established to take over the Department’s current breed improvement programme and develop a new one. An interim Sheep Board, comprising representatives of farming organisations and breeders will oversee this process, with the Irish Cattle Breeders Federation (ICBF) providing the technical and professional service required.

The results of a trial to examine the feasibility of mechanical carcase classification for lamb, which was conducted last year, are being examined. It is hoped that the system will allow for the accurate and objective mechanical classification of lamb carcases and will gain universal industry support. This would aid greatly in price transparency, which is a pre-requisite for efforts to improve quality and respond to the needs of the market.

The Lamb Quality Assurance Scheme was established in 2007. This Scheme is operated by Bord Bia and now has over 7,000 participants.

Teagasc has developed a comprehensive plan to restructure its sheep support services, including a programme for Technology Evaluation and Transfer farms, which include hill and lowland areas. This approach will provide an opportunity to engage with sheep farmers on the use of the latest management practices and to identify research and development needs.

All of these actions — on the part of my Department, its state agencies and the industry — coupled with the considerable financial support for the sector, provide significant assistance to the sector, at a time when many sectors are struggling. I am confident that these can greatly benefit the sector.

52. Deputy Tom Sheahan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is satisfied with the award of permits to mussel fishermen in Cromane, County Kerry, in 2009; his views on whether changes should be introduced to the procedures surrounding the award of such permits in 2010; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36191/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): In agreement with the European Commission, a new regulatory regime was developed in relation to wild fisheries following a European Court of Justice finding that Ireland was not in compliance with its [117]obligations under the EU Birds and Habitats Directives. The new regime sets out a process involving the submission of a Fisheries Management Plan, usually by the local fishermen assisted by BIM, the appropriate assessment of that plan by the Marine Institute and public and statutory consultation. In addition, an Advisory Committee made up of the Department, BIM, Marine Institute, the Sea fisheries Protection Authority, fishing industry representatives and the Environment Pillar representing environmental interests advise me in relation to these matters.

The mussel seed fishery in Cromane, County Kerry was opened this year and permits granted in accordance with the new regulatory regime. A meeting to review the operation of the new regulatory regime is currently being planned by the Department and representatives of interested parties will be invited to attend. However it is not likely that the overall design of the new regulatory system will be changed for next year but changes may be made to the procedures if improvements can be identified.

Question No. 53 answered with Question No. 49.

54. Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will be seeking increased quota for Irish fishermen as part of the review of the Common Fisheries Policy. [36199/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): As the Deputy is aware, the European Commission published a Green Paper last April on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. The launch of this paper was aimed at stimulating broad public debate on the future of the CFP ahead of the next review of the Policy, scheduled for 2012. The Policy, which was first put in place in 1983, has been subject to reviews every ten years. The most recent review was in 2002.

I, along with Minister of State. Deputy Tony Killeen, strongly believe that this review must be informed by the views of our stakeholders, so that a clear and robust Irish position can be developed. Following the publication of the Green Paper, the Minister of State, Deputy Tony Killeen, appointed Dr. Noel Cawley to oversee the consultation process with Irish stakeholders. Dr. Cawley is actively seeking the views of all stakeholders in order to ensure that the Irish submission on the reform of the CFP is as detailed and comprehensive as possible.

The Minister of State, Deputy Killeen, is happy to hear proposals that will support a greater share of the fish stocks for Irish fishermen. We have benefited up to now from the application of the “Hague Preferences” whereby when the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) for traditional Irish stocks are at a reduced level, Ireland benefits with a higher share of the TAC. Under the current CFP, this benefit is not an automatic entitlement but must be secured each year at the December Fisheries Council. This has in recent times been a hard fought battle as other member states lose out when Ireland secures its additional quotas. Therefore, the first priority for Ireland must be to protect this entitlement and to seek to have it reflected as a permanent entitlement in the new CFP. I also see scope for increasing quotas for Irish fishermen as stocks are rebuilt across our area in a sustainable successfully managed and reformed CFP.

To discuss the reform of the CFP directly with the fishermen themselves, the Minister of State, Deputy Killeen, along with Dr Cawley, attended a series of meetings around the country at the end of August. He talked with fishermen about what changes they would like to see made to the CFP, and he listened closely to their views as they are best placed to understand the current Policy’s problems and shortcomings. In addition to these efforts, the Federation of Irish Fishermen (FIF) has undertaken a process to develop its position on the matter. The [118]result of its deliberations will feed into Dr Cawley’s work programme and the formation of Ireland’s position on the review.

The FIF held a conference on the CFP review on Friday, 9 October, at the Radisson Hotel, Dublin Airport. At this seminar a large gathering of fishermen from all around the country listened to contributions from a broad range of experienced experts in the field of fisheries. Further meetings involving stakeholders, including processors, environmental NGOs and the aquaculture sector are planned during the next couple of weeks. The outcome of these meetings will be compiled by Dr. Cawley into a formal report and this will inform Ireland’s national position during the CFP review. All member states, including Ireland, have been invited to submit written comments by 31 December 2009 and I am satisfied that the consultation process put in place will ensure that the views of all stakeholders are fully understood and we are in a position to meet this deadline.

55. Deputy Bernard Allen asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has concluded consideration of a value for money review on the issue of temporary veterinary inspectors; the action he proposes to take arising from this review; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36194/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): This Value for Money (VFM) review relates to the use of the services of TVIs in slaughter plants which are under the supervision of my Department. TVIs are engaged, as and when required, to assist the Department’s official veterinarians in the performance of ante mortem and post mortem tasks at approved plants. The Department expects to be in a position to publish this review in the near future. Its recommendations will be considered carefully, as is the case for all such VFM reviews, and decisions will be taken as appropriate to ensure the most efficient and effective service delivery.

56. Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the status of the swine influenza virus in pigs here in view of the recent reports of an outbreak at a farm in County Cork. [36233/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): On 29 September 2009 the first case of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 was confirmed in Ireland in a pig breeding herd in County Cork. A second case in a breeding/fattening unit in County Cavan was subsequently notified to the Department on 9 October. In both cases, the disease was mild, had low impact on production and has no significance as regards food safety. It is believed that the most likely source of transmission to the pig herds was from infected persons. In both cases the pigs are now fully recovered and showing no clinical signs.

These outbreaks are not unexpected events given the widespread occurrence of the pandemic virus in humans and the possibility for occasional transmission from humans to pigs. In recent months the A/H1N1/2009 virus has been detected in pigs in Canada, Australia, Argentina, and more recently in Norway and Northern Ireland. The Department has recommended that increased biosecurity measures on pig farms be implemented, and that the Code of Practice for Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 in pigs, which had already been drawn up by the Department in consultation with the pig producing stakeholders be adhered to. This code, recently distributed to all pig keepers in the country, sets out the actions that pig keepers should take to [119]reduce the risk of introduction of influenza viruses to pig herds, how to manage the disease if it is confirmed in a herd and how to prevent its onward transmission.

Influenza in pigs is not a public health concern, nor should consumers be concerned about eating pork or pork products. The FAO, the WHO and the OIE, in a combined statement have advised that influenza viruses are not known to be transmissible to humans through eating processed pork or other food products derived pigs. In line with OIE standards, the guidelines agreed at EU level do not recommend to cull infected pig herds or to prohibit the normal movement of clinically healthy animals for slaughter.

57. Deputy Margaret Conlon asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the benefits that arise from the approval, by the EU Commission, of Ireland’s application for official brucellosis-free status; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36062/09]

67. Deputy Margaret Conlon asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the value to farmers here arising from the relaxation of various controls following the approval, by the EU Commission, of Ireland’s application for official brucellosis-free status; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36063/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 57 and 67 together.

Following the recent EU Commission decision granting Ireland officially brucellosis-free status, I announced a series of significant changes to the Brucellosis Eradication Scheme on 8 September 2009 as follows:

an increase in the age threshold for annual round testing to 24 months;

an increase in the validity period of the pre-movement test from 30 days to 60 days;

an increase in the age-limit for the pre-movement test for female animals from 12 to 18 months and, in view of the lower risk attached to their movement, to 24 months for bulls;

an increase in the “one sale” rule for bulls from 12 to 24 months.

In addition with effect from 1 January 2010, dairy herds scheduled to be tested in 2010 and 2011 will now only be tested every second year. This will exclude some 550,000 animals each year from the round test and, when taken in conjunction with the increase in the age threshold to 24 months which is being introduced immediately, will remove some 1.35 million animals from the annual testing programme.

There are considerable benefits arising from these changes in relation to public health, the alleviation of distress to farmers whose herds are affected, the relaxation of restrictions on trade in live cattle and a significant reduction in the cost of testing to farmers. On the latter point, the revised arrangements will remove the need to test approximately a quarter of all eligible animals during the course of the annual herd test. In addition, the extension of the pre-movement test to 60 days combined with the increase in the age threshold to 18 months for female animals for this test will result in further significant savings for farmers. The total saving from these changes is estimated to be in the region of €5 million.

The attainment of official brucellosis-free status was a landmark in the history of disease eradication in Ireland and I would like to thank everybody involved in this successful outcome for their co-operation and sustained effort over many years. However, there is no room for [120]complacency with regard to this disease and we must continue to be vigilant and ensure that we retain our high animal health status which, as I have said, has significant benefits for all concerned, in terms of on-farm costs, public health and market access.

58. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his plans for the future development of the agricultural sector; if he is conscious of the need to ensure security of supply and a reliable price structure for producers; if his attention has been drawn to the concerns of the farming community in this area at the current time; the steps he will take to address these issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36201/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): As Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, I fully acknowledge the difficulties facing the farming community this year and have been consistently working both within Government and at EU level, to alleviate the current problems being faced by the sector. I have initiated a series of measure to assist the sector, a key element is the bringing forward of the single farm payment and I have also negotiated and retained significant support measures which have been put in place by the EU Commission in relation to the dairy sector.

With regard to the future, work is being advanced on the introduction of a new development plan for the agrifood sector in the period up to 2020 to maintain the impetus gained from the successful 2010 and 2015 strategies. This plan will naturally address major issues such as food security, competitiveness and market focus.

59. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has calculated the full extent of the negative impact on individual producers of budgetary cutbacks imposed by his Department in 2009; if it is intended to introduce any amelioration measures; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36200/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The impact of the decisions taken in the 2009 budget and supplementary budget will vary from individual to individual depending on their participation in certain schemes or the extent to which they may benefit from the measures affected.

The Deputy will be aware that the 2009 budget and supplementary budget were framed against the background of a global recession and a serious deterioration in the public finances. As a small open economy Ireland is, of course, particularly exposed to the global downturn and the international credit crisis. In response to this situation, the Government embarked on a strategy to restore the credit system, get the public finances under control and to provide the necessary stimulus to restore confidence in the economy. It was against this background that the very difficult decisions taken in the context of determining the budgetary allocations for agriculture were made.

Notwithstanding the difficult economic and budgetary situation, funding of €1.9 billion gross is provided for my Department in the 2009 budget. When combined with EU funding of about €1.4 billion administered by my Department, this represents a very substantial commitment by Government to supporting and developing the agri-food sector.

Furthermore, in recognition of the difficult circumstances in which farmers find themselves, I have announced the commencement of advance payments of 70% of the single payments scheme payments amounting to €800 million which will commence in the next few days. This is the first time that an advance of this magnitude has been paid at this early stage of the year. [121] The payment of some €220 million under the Disadvantaged Area Scheme commenced last month. The combination of these two schemes with the REP scheme and the suckler cow scheme will result in payments by my Department of more than €1.8 billion to Irish farmers in 2009. This is in addition to more than €300 million in investment support available for the agri food and fisheries sectors, and almost €120 million in supports for the forestry and bio energy sectors.

Work is also continuing on a number of other fronts, including continuing investment in R&D in the agri sector, the provision of investment support for the processing sectors, the protection of Irish farms from animal and plant diseases. I am also continuing my efforts, along with ministerial colleagues in other like minded member states, to ensure the deployment of the full range of EU market support instruments to support the dairy sector through this very difficult time.

I am also proceeding with efforts to further develop the agriculture sector within the budgetary constraints. In that context, I recently announced my intention to introduce a new €179 million Agri Environment Scheme, a new targeted on farm investment scheme worth €113 million, and proposals to spend €75 million in unspent single payment scheme funds to support incomes in the sheep sector and efficiency improvements on dairy farms. I am acutely aware of the pressure on farm incomes and of the difficulties being faced by farm families and I am firmly committed to providing the highest possible levels of support for them and for the agri-food sector.

Question No. 60 answered with Question No. 32.

61. Deputy Joe Costello asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if his Department is undertaking an investigation at meat factories in respect of lamb imports; and the details of such investigations and the names of the factories being investigated. [36206/09]

70. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the investigations his Department is currently conducting in respect of sheep movements and sheep imports; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36205/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 61 and 70 together.

I can confirm that, as part of an investigation into movements of sheep, officers from my Department have visited a number of farms and slaughtering establishments. The information that has been gathered as a result of these visits is being examined, and the investigation is continuing. In the circumstances it would be inappropriate to comment further pending the outcome of the investigation.

Question No. 62 answered with Question No. 45.

63. Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when unannounced inspections commenced in 2009; when they will be concluded. [36209/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The position is that while, in general, all inspections should be unannounced, my Department can give up to 14 days notice for land eligibility and cross-compliance inspections involving Statutory Management [122]Requirements (SMRs) other than those related to cattle identification and registration, food, feed, and animal welfare. For checks involving cattle identification and registration the maximum, advance notice is 48 hours provided the purpose of the inspection is not jeopardised. For SMRs dealing with feed, food and animal welfare, no advance notice may be given. The cross-compliance inspections are integrated insofar as possible in order to minimise the number of farm visits. For 2009, cross compliance inspections commenced on 1st May and are ongoing. All those pre-selected will be inspected within the calendar year.

64. Deputy Pat Rabbitte asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when the role on the Teagasc board vacated by a person (details supplied) will be filled. [36225/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): It is proposed to fill the vacant position on the Board of Teagasc in the near future.

65. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the outcome of the EU Agriculture Council meeting of 5 October 2009, particularly in relation to the dairy sector. [36203/09]

68. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if the views and recommendations of the proposed dairy consultative group will be published and made available to the public. [36221/09]

71. Deputy Johnny Brady asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the role of the high level group of member states, established in early October 2009 at the special meeting of EU Agriculture Ministers in Brussels held to discuss the dairy market; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36058/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 65, 68 and 71 together.

At a special meeting of EU Agriculture Ministers on 5 of October there was a full discussion on the need for measures to manage the dairy market in the period up to quota abolition and beyond. I welcomed the proposal of the Commissioner to establish a High Level Group of representatives to consider a range of options for the future, now that it is accepted by Member States, that quotas will be phased out by 2015, a position that once and for all brings clarity around the issue of milk quotas. The position of the French Minister for agriculture and others in accepting that quotas would end and in calling for an alternative regulatory framework was significant in bringing about this clarity. The newly established High Level Group will address a range of issues in this context.

In specific terms, the High level Group will examine medium term and long term ways of stabilising dairy farmer’s incomes and improving market transparency. In its work towards delivering a comprehensive report by June 2010, the Group will examine means through which contractual arrangements in the supply chain can contribute to the highest possible returns for producers, giving them more bargaining power in the process and providing a buffer against extremes of market volatility such as those that are being experienced at present. It will also examine existing market instruments and consider what other means, including a dairy futures market, could contribute to the objective of price stability in the longer term.

[123]As the first meeting of the High Level group took place earlier this week I was anxious to establish a Consultative Group so that I could hear the views of the experts here on issues emerging at the High Level Group. In particular the ideas, knowledge and expert opinion of the Irish dairy sector will provide key perspectives on how the sector needs to be developed and supported into the future. The consultative group will be representative of all the stakeholders and I will be asking the IFA, ICMSA, ICSA, Macra Na Feirme, ICOS, IDIA and IDB to nominate representatives. In addition, Teagasc and academic interest will be invited to participate and these invitations are in the process of being issued.

66. Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the training and support initiatives which have been afforded to the 70 new dairy farmers allocated milk quotas in October 2009. [36230/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): When I announced recently the allocation of milk quota to 70 new entrants to dairying, I indicated that all of the recipients would have to attend training courses facilitated by Teagasc. That body is currently considering the structure and delivery of the required training, bearing in mind that all successful applicants have until 1 April 2011 to commence milk production.

Question No. 67 answered with Question No. 57.

Question No. 68 answered with Question No. 65.

69. Deputy Christy O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the progress made during the recent series of meetings with fishermen on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36070/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): As you are aware, the European Commission published a Green Paper last April on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. The launch of this paper was aimed at stimulating broad public debate on the future of the CFP ahead of the next review of the Policy, scheduled for 2012. The Policy, which was first put in place in 1983, has been subject to reviews every 10 years. The most recent review was in 2002.

I along with Minister of State Tony Killeen strongly believe, that this review must be informed by the views of our stakeholders, so that a clear and robust Irish position can be developed. Following the publication of the Green Paper, Minister of State Killeen appointed Dr. Noel Cawley to oversee the consultation process with Irish stakeholders. Dr. Cawley is actively seeking the views of all stakeholders in order to ensure that the Irish submission on the reform of the CFP is as detailed and comprehensive as possible.

To discuss the reform of the CFP directly with the fishermen themselves, Minister of State Killeen along with Dr Cawley, attended a series of meetings around the country at the end of August. Minister of State Killeen talked with fishermen about what changes they would like to see made to the CFP, and he listened closely to their views as they are best placed to understand the current Policy’s problems and shortcomings. In addition to these efforts, the Federation of Irish Fishermen (FIF) has undertaken a process to develop its position on the matter. The result of its deliberations will feed into Dr Cawley’s work programme and the formation of Ireland’s position on the review.

[124]The FIF held a conference on the CFP review on Friday, 9 October, at the Radisson Hotel, Dublin Airport. At this seminar a large gathering of fishermen from all around the country listened to contributions from a broad range of experienced experts in the field of fisheries. Further meetings involving stakeholders, including processors, environmental NGOs and the aquaculture sector are planned during the next couple of weeks. The outcome of these meetings will be compiled by Dr Cawley into a formal report and this will inform Ireland’s national position during the CFP review. All Member States, including Ireland, have been invited to submit written comments by 31 December 2009 and Minister of State Killeen is satisfied that the consultation process put in place will ensure that the views of all stakeholders are fully understood and we are in a position to meet this deadline.

Question No. 70 answered with Question No. 61.

Question No. 71 answered with Question No. 65.

72. Deputy Mary Alexandra White asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the outcome of the recent review of the organic farming scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36076/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): My colleague Minister of State Sargent recently announced the outcome of the review of the organic farming scheme under which support is paid to farmers in the sector.

It is my intention, subject to the outcome of the Estimates process and a review of the budgetary situation for 2010, to reopen the organic farming scheme from 1 January 2010. The scheme will be reopened with revised conditions and will include two main changes.

Firstly there will be a requirement for applicants to have completed an approved training course. The courses have been organised by Teagasc and will start in the week commencing 20 October. A farmer who has previously participated in the organic farming supplementary measure of the rural environment protection scheme will be exempted from the requirement to complete this training course. Secondly, as part of the application process, all applicants will have to submit a detailed five-year business plan. The submission of this plan will help my officials to assess the level of farming activity and sustainability of the business of each individual application and, if the scheme is over-subscribed, to identify those that are most likely to deliver increased organic output nationally.

73. Deputy Jim O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the number of additional applications for the farm retirement scheme that have been admitted or are being considered for admission to the scheme following his recent announcement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36132/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The closing date for receipt of applications is 30 October 2009 and no decisions on applications will be taken until after that date.

74. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the amount of money which was sanctioned by the European Union to upskill and retrain workers in the Mallow and Carlow areas in view of the overhaul of the EU sugar regime; the funding which made available; if that fund was drawn down from the EU; if so, the amount of that fund that has been spent; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36204/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry, introduced as part of the reform of the EU sugar regime in 2006, provided for payment of EU restructuring aid to three groups of stakeholders: sugar processors, beet growers and specialized beet machinery contractors. The overall amount of aid available was calculated at the rate of €730 per tonne of sugar quota renounced, which in Ireland’s case was approximately 200,000 tonnes.

To draw down the aid, the sugar processor was required to prepare and implement a restructuring plan, which had to include an environmental plan covering factory demolition and site remediation and a social plan detailing ‘the actions planned with respect to re-training, redeployment and early retirement’ of the factory workers concerned. The EU regulations did not specify how the aid was to be allocated amongst the various costs in the restructuring plan.

The restructuring plan submitted by Greencore duly incorporated a social plan in respect of the former Mallow factory workers. The plan did not apply to the former employees of the Carlow factory, which had already closed prior to the reform of the EU sugar regime. In addition to early retirement and redundancy packages, the social plan included support services for the departing Mallow workers such as career counselling, financial advice including pension advice, pre-retirement programmes for those aged over 50 years, job-seeking support and ‘Start your own business’ programmes. In accordance with the EU regulations, the restructuring aid for the Irish beneficiaries was drawn down in full and paid in two instalments in 2007 and 2008.

Question No. 75 answered with Question No. 39.

76. Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the representations he has received from farming organisations and groups with a view to having the slurry spreading deadline extended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36184/09]

93. Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the discussions he has had with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government with regard to extending the slurry spreading deadline in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36183/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 76 and 93 together.

Officials from my Department and the Department of Environment Heritage and Local Government have had detailed discussions and I have also discussed this matter with my colleague Mr John Gormley T.D., Minister for Environment, Heritage and Local Government. I have had representations from farm bodies and a number of farmers requesting an extension to the spreading period for slurry.

[126]The prohibited period for the spreading of slurry commences on 15th October in all parts of the country as required by the Nitrates Regulations (SI No. 101 of 2009). These Regulations are a matter in the first instance for my colleague the Minister for Environment, Heritage and Local Government. The planned review of Ireland’s Nitrates Action Programme in 2010 will provide an opportunity for all stakeholders to put forward their views on the question of the most appropriate dates for the prohibited periods for spreading fertilisers that are a mandatory requirement under the EU Nitrates Directive. Any adjustment to Ireland’s Nitrates Action Programme will require the agreement of the EU Commission.

77. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on the impact the recommendations of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programme to abolish Bord Bia and Bord Iascaigh Mhara would have on the future of the agri-food and fisheries sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36196/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and expenditure Programmes is being considered in the context of determining the budgetary framework and in the preparation of the 2010 Estimate for my Department. In that context my deliberations on the 2010 Estimates will, of course, take full account of the effect of the proposals in the report, including those relating to An Bord Bia and BIM, on the agri food and fisheries sector. I can assure the deputy that these deliberations will be informed by a continued commitment to the development of a strong, sustainable, export focused agri food and fisheries sector.

78. Deputy P. J. Sheehan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the number, nature and amount of planting area applications made to his Department for forestry grants at each stage in 2009; if he will compare this with the previous five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36198/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The number of applications received in my Department for approval to plant forestry in each of the past 5 years is set out in Table 1.

Table 1: Pre approval applications received

	Forms	Hectares
2004	2,815	30,158
2005	2,361	23,300
2006	2,169	18,687
2007	1,251	13,718
2008	1,303	13,844
2009 to date	1,630	13,193

The number of applications received in my Department for payment of establishment grants for planting forestry in each of the past 5 years is set out in Table 2.

[127]Table 2

	Forms	Hectares
2004	1,039	9,425
2005	1,413	11,808
2006	955	5,691
2007	871	6,237
2008	778	6,145
2009 to date	654	5,498

79. Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the total cost to date of the pig dioxin scare in December 2008. [36210/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The payments to date as a result of the dioxin incident total €102.4 million. This comprises the following: Primary Processor: €30m, Secondary Processors: €39m Producers: €23.6m, Renderers and other costs: €9.8m

80. Deputy Máire Hoctor asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the details of the new targeted scheme for on-farm investment, announced as part of a revised rural development programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36064/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): As part of proposals in relation to the use of unspent Single Payment Scheme and Modulation funds and the European Economic Recovery Programme, I have announced that, in the case of on-farm investment schemes, I intend to introduce support for a number of specific categories of farmers which shall be focused on supporting productive investment.

The measures shall include: a scheme for young dairy farmers to make the necessary investment to adjust to expanding dairy opportunities and promote the operation of cost-effective commercial operations by young farmers; aid for sheep fencing and handling facilities to assist sheep farmers in reducing labour input in a vulnerable sector; aid for young trained farmers for water harvesting and conservation equipment, which will reduce water costs on farms; animal welfare grants (a) for pig producers to assist in the conversion to loose housing for sows; and (b) for poultry producers to assist in the conversion to enriched cages, free range or barn systems. The measures will be strictly cash-limited and are currently being considered by the EU Commission. The measures will be introduced as soon as relevant EU approval has been obtained and following agreement on the specific cash-limits available for each measure.

81. Deputy Phil Hogan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his plans to publish legislation banning fur farming; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35936/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The renewed Programme for Government includes a commitment to phase out fur farming over three years. [128] I have asked my officials to examine what legislative changes are necessary to give effect to that commitment.

82. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the steps he is taking to support a live cattle trade to Britain; the numbers exported to date in 2009; the corresponding figure for 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36081/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The live export trade is an important element of Ireland’s meat and livestock industry providing a complement to the beef trade. The following table sets out the exports of live cattle in 2009 to the United Kingdom and the corresponding figures for 2008.

Destination	1 January – 4 October 2009	1 January – 4 October 2008

Northern Ireland	61,491	21,535
Great Britain	7,180	1,171
United Kingdom	68,671	22,706

Bord Bia continues to work closely with the industry in monitoring and developing emerging opportunities for Irish livestock in the United Kingdom, the Continent and international markets. This includes contact with leading retailers in Britain to establish their interest in cattle born in Ireland and finished in Britain.

83. Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the status of proceedings aimed at bringing down the costs of disposing of fallen animals. [36222/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The disposal of fallen animals is subject to EU Regulations, notably Regulation (EC) No 1774 of 2002. These regulations require that animals which die on-farm must generally be disposed of through approved knackeries and rendering plants. My Department’s contribution to the Fallen Animals Scheme ceased with effect from 14th April 2009. This was as a result of budgetary constraints and also reflects the greatly reduced incidence of BSE in this country. However I have continued to provide financial support for the collection of certain fallen animals, in particular bovines over 48 months of age, for sampling, as required under the ongoing national BSE surveillance programme.

With the ending of the Fallen Animals Scheme the cost of collection and rendering for animals not covered by the new scheme became a matter for negotiation between the individual collectors/rendering plants and their customers. My Department is continuing, within the boundaries of legal requirements, to make every effort to facilitate measures to maximise flexibility and enable reduction of costs in the rendering/collection system. This includes allowing cross border trade, permitting direct delivery by farmers to authorised plants, considering removal of some costs currently built into the rendering process and encouraging indigenous use of meat and bone meal (MBM) for energy purposes.

Approval conditions have been drawn up to facilitate the collection of fallen animals direct from farms by approved rendering plants, including arrangements to provide for TSE testing of these animals where required. Discussions are also ongoing between my Department and [129]farmer and hunt representatives, to consider the feasibility of extending the network of plants authorised to act as knackeries.

Question No. 84 answered with Question No. 45.

85. Deputy Pat Rabbitte asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will respond to reports that the relevant authorities in Northern Ireland were not adequately informed of the actions taken by his Department following the crisis surrounding dioxin in pig meat in December 2008. [36224/09]

The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): On 4 December my Department issued a Press Release to indicate that it was investigating in close collaboration with the F.S.A.I., the source of a contaminant in animal feed. This followed the disclosure of non dioxin like marker PCBs in pork fat. The F.S.A.I. contacted the Food Standards Agency in the U.K. about the matter that day. The first indication that Northern Ireland was implicated in receiving possibly contaminated feed was on the evening of Thursday 4th December 2008. On Friday 5th December my Department provided full details to the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Northern Ireland.

When dioxins were identified on 6 December and the F.S.A.I. required a full recall of all Irish pork and bacon products from pigs slaughtered in Ireland since 1st September 2008 the information was immediately put in the public domain by way of a press announcement. The FSAI arranged to issue an alert notification on the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) to advise the EU Commission and all EU Member States. There was also direct contact between the FSAI and the Food Standards Agency in London and in Belfast that evening.

Question No. 86 answered with Question No. 49.

Question No. 87 answered with Question No. 30.

88. Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if his attention has been drawn to the report by an organisation (details supplied) which states that the REP scheme contributes more to the Exchequer than it costs; and if this report will inform his approach to the REP scheme in future. [36234/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I am aware of the statement by the organisation concerned. However, REPS 4 was closed to new applicants in July against the background of the situation in the public finances, the resources available to my Department and the substantial increase, over the past year, in the number of REPS participants. A record 16,718 applications were received up to the closing date of 15 May for 2009, and further applications which were received up to the time of closure will be processed as applications for 2010. Payments due to REPS farmers for 2009 will be the highest ever and all participants already in REPS will continue to receive annual payments until their current contracts run their course

I plan to introduce a new agri-environment scheme in 2010 which will reduce compliance costs to participants and which will provide a menu of targeted actions from which farmers may choose. In August 2009 I invited submissions on the proposed new scheme and the report referred to was included in a submission received for the named organisation. Funding for the [130]new scheme will include the additional modulation funds which I ensured will be retained for the benefit of Irish farmers in the negotiations on the CAP “Health Check”. It will also include additional matching Exchequer funding. The details of the scheme are in the process of being finalised and will require the approval of the European Commission, which has already received an outline of our proposals.

89. Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the number of inspections to be carried out under the single payment scheme in 2009; the number carried out to date in 2009; and the number of penalties imposed. [36208/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): In the context of delivering the Single Payment Scheme, my Department is required to carry out on-the-spot inspections on a number of farms covering such issues as eligibility under the Scheme, compliance with EU legislation in the areas of the environment, food safety, animal health and welfare and plant health and ensuring that the farm is maintained in good agricultural and environmental condition. A minimum of 5% of Single Payment Scheme applicants is required to be inspected under the eligibility rule. These checks are carried out to verify that the actual area claimed in the Single Payment Scheme application form corresponds to the area held by the farmer and to ensure there are no overlapping claims, or duplicate claims. Up to two thirds of these inspections are carried out without a farm visit and using the technique of remote sensing.

The rate of on-farm inspection required for cross-compliance is 1% of those farmers to whom the Statutory Management Requirements or GAEC apply. Under the relevant Regulations 5% of producers must be inspected under the Bovine Animal Identification and Registration requirements together with 3% of sheep producers covering 5% of the National flock. For the 2009 Scheme, there were a total of 11,391 farms selected for inspection out of some 130,000 who have applied for the Single Payment Scheme — over 100,000 of these are also applicants under the Disadvantaged Areas Scheme. The value of both schemes to Irish farmers is some €1.5bn. Over 3,000 of these inspections are carried out without a farm visit using the technique of remote sensing.

All inspections relating to land eligibility have been carried out and are being processed for payment. Currently, 1,063 applicants will be paid on a lesser amount than they claimed as a result of a minor area discrepancy while a further 233 have recorded penalties as the discrepancy was greater than 3% of the area found. Inspections relating to Cross Compliance are still ongoing but with 3,792 completed there are currently 404 penalties in place.

90. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the attempts he has made to convey Irish concerns on the importing of Brazilian beef to the European Commission. [36228/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): In December 2007 the Commission proposed more severe restrictions on Brazilian imports to the Community. This arose from the findings of EU Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) during its various missions to Brazil. These restrictions were recommended by the Standing Committee on the Food Chain & Animal Health (SCoFCAH) and proposed that imports be limited to a small [131]number of farms that could meet the criteria laid down by the FVO. Ireland could not support proposal and argued that a total ban on beef imports from Brazil was justified in view of the FVO’s findings. Other Member States however supported the Commission’s proposal which was duly adopted Commission Decision No. 2008/61/EC.

Following this there have been a number of FVO missions which continue to report shortcomings in the Brazilian system. When these reports were discussed at SCoFCAH meetings other Member States continued to support the Commission’s approach of restricting imports as opposed to applying a total ban.

Question No. 91 answered with Question No. 51.

Question No. 92 answered with Question No. 49.

Question No. 93 answered with Question No. 76.

94. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the specific irregularities relating to cross-compliance measures that led to his Department being fined €715,000. [36229/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): There are no specific irregularities relating to cross compliance measures that led to my Department being fined by the European Commission. The position is that, following a preventative audit by the European Commission in 2005 examining the introduction of the Cross Compliance system in Ireland, the auditors were not satisfied that all farmers selected for an on-the-spot check under the cross-compliance rules were examined for all Statutory Management Requirements (SMRs) applicable to them.

For 2005, my Department had selected farmers for cross-compliance inspection on the basis of risk pertaining to each individual SMR. We thus selected 1% of farmers for inspection under each individual SMR while the Commission contended that we should have selected 1% of farmers and inspected them for compliance with each individual SMR applicable to them. The Commission argued that this system was required under the Regulations in force at that time.

The Commission originally proposed a disallowance of €1.769m. My Department maintained that the system of risk analysis adopted by Ireland was at least as effective as the system proposed by the Commission. Following detailed bilateral discussions and a meeting with the Conciliation Body the Commission reduced the disallowance to €0.715m. It should be noted that the EU regulations governing selection of the control sample for cross-compliance were amended in 2007 so as to allow a risk selection similar to that adopted by Ireland in 2005.

95. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the costs incurred by her constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at her Department in respect of leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36379/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): My Department has not incurred any costs associated with the design, production, delivery etc of [132]leaflets by my constituency office or by the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at my Department or by the constituency offices of any of our predecessors in 2007, 2008 or to date in 2009.

96. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by her and the Ministers of State at her Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36393/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The total cost related to foreign travel undertaken by all Ministers and Ministers of State at my Department from January 2007 to the end of September 2009 was as follows:

Year	€
2007	146,980.61
2008	184,369.39
2009 (to end-Sept.)	43,907.26

These figures include all identifiable costs related to flights, accommodation, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs which were paid for by my Department. They include costs related to accompanying staff of the relevant Minister or Minister of State’s office. Where Ministerial foreign travel was organised by an agency of the Department, certain costs related to the Ministerial delegation were borne directly by the relevant agency.

97. Deputy Brendan Kenneally asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the grants provided to Industrial Development Authority related projects nationally per year over the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36421/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): Over the five-year period, 2004 to 2008, IDA Ireland paid out a total of €391,008,000 in grants to its client companies. Details of these payments are set out in the attached tabular statement:

IDA Grant Payments to client companies in each year 2004-2008

Year	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008
Amount	€	€	€	€	€
Total	62,579,000	82,949,000	92,391,000	75,088,000	78,001,000

98. Deputy Brendan Kenneally asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of jobs created by Enterprise Ireland in Waterford per year over the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36426/09]

[133]Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The Forfás Annual Employment Survey reports on job gains in companies that are supported by Enterprise Ireland. Data is compiled on an annualised basis and is aggregated at county level. Figures for 2009 will not be available until early 2010. The number of jobs created by Enterprise Ireland supported companies in Waterford in each of the 5 year period 2004-2008 are shown on the attached tabular statement:

Table showing the number of jobs created in Enterprise Ireland supported companies in Waterford over the 5 year period 2004-2008.

Waterford	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008
Number	299	162	409	763	167

99. Deputy Brendan Kenneally asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the grants provided to Enterprise Ireland related projects in Waterford per year over the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36427/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): Enterprise Ireland offers a comprehensive range of services, including both financial and non-financial supports, to companies with a business strategy that encompasses the elements required for business success. Enterprise Ireland provides a wide variety of supports and development programmes to client companies, including the Community Enterprise Centre scheme, Centres of Excellence, the Enterprise Platform Programme, Enterprise START Programme and Innovation Vouchers.

Enterprise Ireland assesses applications for financial assistance according to a number of criteria, including cost benefit modelling, commercial evaluation and technical assessment in order to ensure value for money to the exchequer. Enterprise Ireland has supported a variety of projects in Waterford over the last five years through both direct and indirect grant aid to companies, Community Enterprise Centres and Educational Institutes in Waterford. The value of grant payments to Enterprise Ireland supported companies in County Waterford in each year of the 5 year period 2005-2009 are shown on the attached tabular statement.

Table showing the value of grant payments to companies in County Waterford over the 5 year period 2005-2009.

Payments to Companies in County Waterford

2005	2006	2007	2008	Ytd 2009
Payments	€1,225,384	€902,595	€1,155,414	€2,025,818	€1,949,942

100. Deputy Brendan Kenneally asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the grants provided to Industrial Development Authority related projects in Waterford per year over the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36428/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): Over the five-year period, 2004 to 2008, IDA Ireland paid out a total of €21.5m in grants to its client companies in Co. Waterford. Details of these payments, on a year-by-year basis, are set out in the attached tabular statement.

Table Showing IDA Grant Payments to client companies in Waterford in each of the years 2004-2008

Year	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008
Amount	€1,554,000	€3,337,000	€4,643,000	€7,265,000	€4,740,000

101. Deputy Brendan Kenneally asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of jobs created by Enterprise Ireland here per year over the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36430/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The Forfás Annual Employment Survey reports on job gains in companies that are supported by Enterprise Ireland. Data is compiled on an annualised basis and is aggregated at county level. Figures for 2009 will not be available until early 2010. The numbers of jobs created by Enterprise Ireland supported companies in each year of the 5 year period 2004-2008 are shown in the tabular statement.

Table showing the number of jobs created in Enterprise Ireland supported companies over the 5 year period
2004-2008.

2004	2005	2006	2007	2008
12,564	14,316	15,052	15,776	10,522

102. Deputy Brendan Kenneally asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the grants provided to Enterprise Ireland related projects nationally per year over the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36431/09]

Direct to business support includes grant and equity payments to companies in areas including R & D, training and broad company development. Third level support involves grants to researchers in the third level sector, support for collaborative R & D and infrastructural investment. These figures do not include supports such as Venture Capital Funding; Infrastructural Payments e.g. Community Enterprise Centres and payments to other third parties e.g. City and County Enterprise Boards. The annual breakdown of payments by Enterprise Ireland in direct financial supports to industry and third level institutions in each year of the 5 year period 2004-2008 are shown in the tabular statement.

Table showing the value of grant payments to companies over the 5 year period 2004-2008.

Type of Support	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	Total
	€’000	€’000	€’000	€’000	€’000	€’000
Direct to Business	64,437	64,272	68,889	79,456	105,716	382,770
Dept. of Agriculture Dairy Fund				2,985	25,084	28,069
Third Level	33,373	47,896	49,171	62,498	67,346	260,284
Total	97,810	112,168	118,060	144,939	198,146	671,123

103. Deputy Brendan Kenneally asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of jobs created by the Industrial Development Authority here each year over the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36456/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The Forfás Annual Employment Survey reports on job gains in companies that are supported by IDA Ireland. Data are compiled on an annualised basis and are aggregated at county level. Over the five-year period, 2004 to 2008, a total of 53,679 new jobs were created in IDA supported companies. The number of jobs created in each of those years is shown in the tabular statement.

Number of IDA jobs created over the last five years

Year	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008
New Jobs Created	10,959	12,041	11,866	9,976	8,837

104. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the status of the review process on employee representation as outlined in point 9.3 of the Transitional Agreement 2008 to 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36496/09]

106. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment her proposals to outlaw the victimisation of employees for involvement in trade union activity with regard to item 9.4 of the Transitional Agreement for 2008 to 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36498/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Dara Calleary): I propose to take Questions Nos. 104 and 106 together.

The law and practice relating to the status of collective bargaining in this country, and the arrangements to support it and address issues of victimisation and discrimination against those who seek to promote it, were matters which were discussed at length during the social partnership discussions which led to the conclusion of the Towards 2016 Review and Transitional Agreement 2008-2009. The Towards 2016 Review and Transitional Agreement 2008-2009 (paras 9.1 — 9.3) provides for the establishment of a review process which would consider the legal and other steps necessary to enable the employee representation mechanisms that had [136]been established under previous agreements — and in legislation — to operate as they had been intended.

The Towards 2016 Review and Transitional Agreement 2008-2009 (para 9.4) also commits the Government to bringing forward legislative proposals to prohibit the victimisation of trade union members and to prohibit the incentivisation of persons not to be members of a trade union.

With a view to progressing work on both commitments, a Review Group on Employee Representation — chaired by the Secretary General of the Department of the Taoiseach and on which my Department; the Department of Finance; trade unions; and employers are represented — has been put in place to examine these issues. Informal engagement has taken place between the parties and position papers have been submitted by the employer and trade union representatives on the issues requiring the Group’s consideration.

105. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of working days lost to her Department as a consequence of trade union leave for 2008; the trade union leave arrangements for staff; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36497/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): During 2008 staff of my Department availed of 17 days paid trade union leave. The trade union leave arrangements in place in my Department are in accordance with Department of Finance Circular 14/1980 —“Facilities for non full-time representatives of staff associations/unions”.

Question No. 106 answered with Question No. 104.

107. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the unions which have been contracted by FÁS with regard to the union-led learning network; the value and duration of each contract; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36499/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): FÁS has informed me that in September 2007 it awarded a number of contracts under the union learning networks programme. That support was provided under the Strategic Alliances Initiative for projects to train low-skilled workers and to promote life-long learning. This is in line with the provisions of Towards 2016.

These projects provide for the development of a regional infrastructure to recruit, train and support voluntary workplace learning advocates whose job is to then encourage the vocational development of their low skilled colleagues. In this regard, the voluntary workplace learning advocates must identify the training needs of the learner. The voluntary workplace learning advocates are identified mainly, though not exclusively, by local employee committees and in consultation with employers. The voluntary workplace learning advocate generally undertakes 5 days of training in advocacy skills and approaches that leads to a FETAC NFQ Level 5 qualification. Details of the union learning network programmes are set out in the Annex.

The ICTU contract to date has involved the recruitment of 8 Regional Co-ordinators to promote the programme and build relationships with unions and employers. In turn, the recruitment and training of the workplace learning advocates is now gathering momentum and is on [137]target for completion within the deadline. As a direct follow on from the ICTU training of workplace learning advocates, some 1,200 low-skilled learners have already undertaken learning courses to date.

As a result of the SIPTU training of 50 workplace learning advocates the training needs of over 800 low-skilled workers have been assessed to date. A separate contract between FÁS and SIPTU to the value of €1,321,583 provides for the delivery of courses by SIPTU’s IDEAS Training Institute to learners. 350 learners have received training to date.

ANNEX

Union	Contract Duration	Value of Contract	Workplace Learning Advocates training target	Workplace Learners training target	Trained to date
		€m
ICTU	26/8/2008-30/9/2010	3.890	460	Not applicable	116
SIPTU	1/6/08-30/6/2011	0.684	50	Not applicable	50
SIPTU	1/6/08-30/6/2011	1.322	Not applicable	1,000	350

108. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of companies availing of the work place innovation fund for each of the past three years; the number of applications refused in each; the reason for refusal; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36500/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Dara Calleary): The Workplace Innovation Fund (WIF) was introduced in April 2007 to operate over the period 2007-2009. The aim of the Workplace Innovation Fund (WIF) is to support small and medium sized enterprises that are committed to workplace innovation and developing the role of employee participation and involvement as enablers of change and productivity improvements. The fund is administered jointly by Enterprise Ireland and the National Centre for Partnership and Performance. Since April 2007 to date 36 companies have been approved for WIF funding.

	Applied	Approved	Refused
2007	23	22	1
2008	14	13
2009		1*
Total	37	36	1

The single rejected application was to be reconsidered at a future date pending receipt of additional information, which was not forthcoming.

109. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of staff members who have been dismissed from her Department in [138]each of the past five years and their grade and reason for dismissal; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36501/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): Three Civil Servants were dismissed from my Department in the last five years for misconduct. All 3 were dismissed during 2009. Confidentiality concerns preclude me from giving details of the grades of the individuals involved.

110. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the reason only 3% of staff in her Department received an unacceptable or needs improvement rating; her views on whether this is an accurate reflection of her Department’s strengths and weakness in terms of personnel; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36502/09]

111. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if she is satisfied with the operation of the performance management development system within her Department; her views on whether under-performance is being tackled and good performance is being acknowledged as stated in the report of the organisation review programme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36503/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): I propose to take Questions Nos. 110 and 111 together.

The 3% figure quoted by the Deputy is the result of annual reviews undertaken by managers with almost 1,000 staff in the Department and its offices under the Performance Management Development System, PMDS. The PMDS system does not impose any ideal or targeted distribution of ratings. My Department’s priority is to ensure that PMDS is an effective mechanism for managing performance in the organisation. In that regard, my Department has always enthusiastically embraced the system as a vital tool for managing and developing the performance of staff to enable them to contribute fully to the work of the Department. The report of the Organisational Review Programme, ORP, found that the training and development aspects of PMDS in the Department were good and that staff found the PMDS dialogue a useful process of engagement with their managers. The ORP identified some room for improvement including the need to better address underperformance and poor performance.

New guidelines for managing underperformance have been prepared under the Department’s updated human resources strategy and are almost finalised. Included in the guidelines are objectives for recognising underperformance at an early stage and identifying the underlying causes of such performance; strategies for managing underperformance and supporting managers; and methods for invoking the disciplinary procedures available to managers. In conjunction with the development of these guidelines, the Department has initiated an internal training programme for managers at all levels in managing underperformance, which will begin later this month. The ORP also found that many managers do not sufficiently manage good performance. The Department acknowledges that the use of feedback is important in ensuring that good performance is recognised. It is reviewing the provision of training for all staff in how to make the most effective use of feedback in recognising good performance at all levels of the organisation.

The Department is always proactive in regard to the training and development of staff at every level. From induction training through grade-based development programmes and specific competency development training, the Department is vigilant in ensuring that its staff [139]members are constantly upskilled in order to fulfil their roles while achieving the strategic objectives of the Department.

112. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment her views on the report of the organisation review programme with respect to her Department; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36504/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The Organisational Review Programme, ORP, process is essentially a review mechanism to allow the Government to assess how Departments and Offices of State are performing in terms of capacity to deliver Government policy and service delivery generally. The first phase of the ORP process was launched in 2007 with a review of three Departments, including my Department. Indeed, it was a sign of my Department’s commitment to regularly assessing its performance levels, as well as its keenness to identify areas for further improvement, that it volunteered as one of the first Departments to be reviewed under the ORP process.

The report of the first phase of the ORP, which was published in November 2008, outlined my Department’s strengths and weaknesses by reference to ten attributes, which were grouped under the three components of strategy, managing delivery and evaluation. An action plan was developed by my Department in response to the challenges for the Department outlined in the report. That plan was published with the ORP report. The plan contained 38 action points addressing the common areas of communications, policy analysis, development and evaluation capabilities and leadership, human resources policy, quality customer service, ICT resources, financial management and governance issues. Since the report and action plan were published, an implementation group in my Department has been established to monitor progress on delivering the plan’s individual action points. I am pleased to report that many of them have, at this juncture, been implemented or are well advanced.

As well as reporting to my Department’s management board by the end of the year to outline the overall progress that has been achieved, the group is considering the identification of further measures necessary to continue to meet our organisational challenges into the future, as well as prioritisation of remaining action points in light of the new economic environment in which my Department is operating. Overall, I was heartened by the positive messages contained in the report regarding the ability of my Department, and staff, to deliver on our strategic objectives. I welcomed its recommendations as a vehicle to drive further enhancements to help its to meet its current and future challenges.

113. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the outcome of the assessment carried out on extending the 15 day payment deadline to local authorities and the health and education sectors; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36505/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The application of the 15-day payment period requirement to local authorities and the health and education sectors remains under review. Organisations within the sector are committed to meeting their current payment periods. Suppliers experiencing difficulties in securing timely payments should, in the first instance, contact the relevant section of the organisation with which the contract was agreed. My Department has made an arrangement through the auspices of the Credit Supply Clearing Group, whereby representative bodies of the SME sector can [140]bring to the attention of the Clearing Group individual cases of late payments in these sectors which are adversely impacting on the cash-flow or working capital of SMEs. Under this arrangement, my Department will have such late payment practices examined by the parent Department involved and reported back on them to my Department.

114. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the progress regarding the mainstreaming of the knowledge economy skills passport; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36506/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The Knowledge Economy Skills Passport programme is an innovative initiative of the National College of Ireland. It is developed in collaboration with a consortium of software companies to deliver the core skills and competencies needed for the knowledge economy. The programme is funded by FÁS. It is a blended learning course in the areas of technology and business. It comprises an e-learning on-line component and face-to-face tutorial sessions. It leads to a HETAC award at Level 6. To date, some 400 students have participated in the pilot Knowledge Economy Skills Passport programme, which was subsequently evaluated and relevant software licensing issues resolved. FÁS intends to make the programme available through its training channels and to other training providers.

115. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the position regarding her reply to Question No. 69 of 10 December 2008, in view of the changed circumstances; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36507/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Dara Calleary): Further to the notification my Department received in late 2008 from the company in question, notifying its intention to effect collective redundancies at the company, applications were subsequently submitted by the company seeking a 60% rebate of the statutory redundancy amounts paid out to employees. The applications have been examined to see if they meet the eligibility criteria set down in the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 to 2007. Arising from this examination, additional information was sought from the company. My Department awaits a response from the company in relation to the issues raised. It is departmental policy not to comment publicly on any particular company’s applications for redundancy payments. No more recent notification of further collective redundancies at the company has been received in the Department.

116. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the position regarding her reply to Parliamentary Question No. 109 of 23 June 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36508/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): My Department is charged with leading the cross-governmental drive to reduce administrative burdens on business. We are doing this in a prioritised way, drawing on the experiences of other Member States who are also involved in this international effort. Departments are currently identifying the “Information Obligations” contained in their legislation that are likely to be causing the biggest burdens for business. When the top Information Obligations have been [141]identified, these priorities will be measured. Following this, simplification plans will be developed, detailing how the reductions are to be carried out.

Work is well advanced in my Department in measuring information obligations in company law, employment law and health and safety law. My Department has identified 34 priority information obligations across these three areas, details of which follow this reply. The priorities were identified through consultation with business groups and experts and by comparison with the results of the UK measurement exercise. It is envisaged that measurement of the 34 Information Obligations will be completed by the end of 2009. Other Departments are listing and prioritising the Information Obligations contained in the legislation under their responsibility. Measurement of priorities identified across all sectors of government will be carried out during 2010. When these measurements have been concluded, simplification plans will be developed. Following this, simplification will be carried out during 2011 and 2012.

[142]Top Eight Company Law IOs

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Companies	Source of Initiative
1	Keeping of Books of Account	Every company must keep books of account that correctly record and explain company transactions; that enable the financial position of the company to be determined at any time; that enable the directors to ensure that annual accounts of the Company will comply with the Companies Acts and if applicable the IAS Regulations; and that will enable the company to be readily and properly audited. The books must be continuously and consistently maintained. the books should contain entries of all monies expended and received, a record of assets and liabilities, a record of goods purchased and sold, records of invoices received, statements of stock held by the company, records of services provided and invoices relating thereto. The books must give a true and fair view of the state of the companies affairs and should explain transactions. The books should be kept at the registered office or wherever the directors think fit. If kept outside the state returns must be made so that directors know the position of the company with reasonable accuracy. Books, accounts and returns must be available in an official language of the State at all reasonable times for inspection by officers of the company. Records must be maintained for 6 years.	s 202 1990 CA	ongoing	any company
2	Abridged Accounts	Where a company annexes abridged accounts to the annual return required to be sent to the registrar under s 156 1963 CA, they must be signed as required by s 156 and also must contain a statement from the directors that they have relied on the exemptions in ss 10-12 on the grounds the company is either a small or medium sized company and also the auditors report must be sent with the return stating that it is their opinion that the directors are entitled to annex abridged accounts to the return. Such a copy of the auditors report in relation to entitlement to annex abridged accounts to the return must be certified by a director and a secretary to be a true copy of such a report.	s 18 1986 C(A)A	annual	companies availing of the exemptions under ss 10-12 of the 1986 C(A)A	The 1986 C(A)A gives effect to Directive 78/660/EEC. Note: this act does not apply to specific companies- which are laid out in s 2 1986 C(A)A

[143]Top Eight Company Law IOs — continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Companies
3	Annual General Meetings	A company must hold a general meeting as its annual general meeting once a year. It is necessary that a meeting which is to be the AGM must be specified as such in any of the notices calling it. .	s 131(1) 1963 CA	annual	all
3	Annual General Meetings	If a general meeting is deemed to be an annual general meeting by resolution, then the company must forward a copy of the resolution to the registrar of companies within 15 days	s 131(3)(4)(5) 1963 CA	annual	all
3	Length of Notice for Calling Meetings	An AGM requires 21 days notice in writing; any other meeting which is not an AGM or a meeting for the passing of a special resolution — 14 days notice in writing if the company is not either private or unlimited, 7 days notice in writing if the company is private or unlimited. Note that notice means clear notice — ie exclusive of both the day on which the notice is served and also the day of the meeting.	s 133 (1) 1963 CA; see also Sch 1 Table A Part 1 (51) 1963 CA; Sch 1 Table A Part II (4); Schedule 1 Table C (8) 1963 CA; Sch 1 Table E Part II (4) 1963 CA; see also s 38 1983 C(A)A	recurring	all
3	Notice Of Meetings	Every notice of a meeting of a company must state that members who are entitled to attend and vote can also appoint a proxy to speak and vote in his/her stead. It must be clear that the proxy need not be a member.	s 136 (3) 1963 CA	recurring	any company having a share capital.
3	Notice Of Meetings	Where notice of a meeting is given to the company for the purpose of a resolution requiring extended notice, then the company must give its members notice of the meeting, or if not practicable shall give notice by means of an advertisement in a daily newspaper circulating in the area or by other means allowed in its articles, at least 21 days before the meeting.	s 142 (1) 1963 CA	on event	all
4	Minute Books	Every company must enter minutes of all general meetings, meetings of directors and meetings of committees of directors, in books kept specifically for minutes.	s 145 (1) 1963 CA; Sch 1 Table A Part 1 (89) 1963 CA	ongoing.	all
4	Minute Books	The Director can require the production of the minute books maintained under s 145 (1) for inspection and can also take copies of the contents of the books. Companies and officers of the company are under a duty to facilitate the director here.	s 145 (3A) 1963 CA	on event	all

[144]Top Eight Company Law IOs — continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Companies
4	Minute Books	Minute books of any general meeting of the copy must be kept at the registered office of the company and must be available for inspection by any member without charge for at least two hours a day during business hours. A member can request a copy of any such minutes and is entitled to such a copy within 7 days of the request on payment of a small fee.	s 146 (1)(2) 1963 CA	ongoing	all
5	Register of Members.	Every company is obliged to maintain a register of its members which must include their names, addresses, the shares they hold, the amount paid or agreed to be paid on the shares of each member, the date at which person became a member, the date at which any person ceased to be a member. These details must be entered within 28 days of the agreement with the company to become a member, or within 28 days of the company’s registration in the case of a subscriber to the memorandum. Regarding the date at which a person ceases to be a member, this must be entered within 28 days of a person ceasing to be a member. If a company has converted shares into stock and given notice to the registrar, then the register of members must also show the amount of stock each member holds instead of the amount of shares.	s 116 (1)(2)(3)(4) 1963 CA	ongoing	all
5	Register of Members.	The company must keep the Register of Members at its registered office, or at another company office if that is where the work of making it up is done or if a third party maintains the register for the company, it may be kept at their office. However the company cannot keep the register of members outside the state. The company must also give the registrar notice of the place where the register of members is kept and also of any change in that place. However no notice is required where the register has at all times since its creation been kept at the company’s registered office.	s 116(5)(6)(7)(8) 1963 CA	ongoing	all

[145]Top Eight Company Law IOs — continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Companies	Source of Initiative
6	Register of Directors and Secretaries.	Every company must maintain a register of directors and secretaries at its registered office. It should detail the directors’ names, address, date of birth, nationality, occupation, and any other directorships of bodies corporate held, or which have been held by him. Details should include directorships held in the last ten years, but need not include companies which are wholly owned within the same group. Secretaries’ names and addresses should be detailed. Note: Any changes should be entered within 14 days and the registrar of companies must also be notified. (Form B10) Note: The register must be kept open for inspection for at least 2 hours in each day by any member of the company without charge, and by any other person on payment of a small fee. Any person can request a copy of the register on payment of a small fee, the company must furnish that copy within 1- days of their request.	s 195 1963 CA	ongoing.	all
7	Notice of Directors on all Business Letters	Companies must detail the name, any former name and nationality (if not Irish) of every Director on any business letter where the company name appears. (The Minister can grant exemptions)	s 196(1) 1963 CA	ongoing.	any company registered under the 1963 or 1908 Act unless registered before 23/11/1916, any company registered outside the State but with an established place of business in the state unless established before 23/11/1986, any company licensed under the Moneylenders Act 1933.

[146]Top Eight Company Law IOs — continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Companies	Source of Initiative
8	Substantial Contracts etc with Directors and others to be disclosed in accounts.	Where a holding company prepares group accounts under s 150 1963 CA they must contain details of 1) any transaction or arrangement of a kind described in s 31 1990 CA entered into by the company/subsidiary for a person who was at the time a director, director of the holding company or a connected person; 2) any agreement by the company or its subsidiary to enter into any such transaction for a person who was at the time a director, director of the holding company or a connected person; 3) any other transaction with the company or subsidiary in which a person who was at the time a director, director of the holding company and who had a material interest in the transaction either directly or indirectly. Note: This excludes transactions and arrangements between one company and another in which a director is only interested by virtue of being a director; contracts of service between a company and one of its directors or a director of its holding company or one of its subsidiaries; a transaction not entered into during the relevant period and any transaction made before the commencement of this section. Note: ss 42 and 43 detail the particulars to be included where s 41 applies. Note: Arrangements mentioned in s 32(2) are excluded. See s 45 1990 CA.	s 41(1)(6)(7) 1990 CA; see also ss 42 and 43 and 45 1990 CA	on event	companies preparing group accounts under s 150 1963 CA; excludes a company which is a holding company of a bank.

[147]Top Eight Company Law IOs — continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Companies	Source of Initiative
8	Substantial Contracts etc with Directors and others to be disclosed in accounts.	Where a company prepares accounts other than a holding company such accounts must contain details of 1) any transaction or arrangement of a kind described in s 31 1990 CA entered into by the company/subsidiary for a person who was at the time a director, director of the holding company or a connected person; 2) any agreement by the company or its subsidiary to enter into any such transaction for a person who was at the time a director, director of the holding company or a connected person; 3) any other transaction with the company or subsidiary in which a person who was at the time a director, director of the holding company and who had a material interest in the transaction either directly or indirectly. Note: This excludes transactions and arrangements between one company and another in which a director is only interested by virtue of being a director; contracts of service between a company and one of its directors or a director of its holding company or one of its subsidiaries; a transaction not entered into during the relevant period and any transaction made before the commencement of this section. Note: ss 42 and 43 detail the particulars to be included where s 41 applies. Note: Arrangements mentioned in s 32(2) are excluded. See s 45 1990 CA.	s 41(2)(6)(7) 1990 CA; see also ss 42 and 43 and 45 1990 CA	on event	any company preparing accounts other than a holding company, excludes a company which is a holding company of a bank.

[148]Top Eleven Employment Law IOs

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Businesses	Source of Initiative
	Industrial Relations Acts 1946 to 2004
1	Posting of Notices	An employer of any workers shall post in the prescribed manner such notices as may be prescribed for the purpose of informing them of any matter related to an employment regulation order affecting such workers.	s49(2) 1946; see also s7 1976	on event	Does not apply to employers with regard to agricultural workers. Applies to all other employers.	Irish Legislature
	National Minimum Wage Act 2000
2	Records	An employer shall keep such records as are necessary to show that each of his or her employees is being paid not less than the minimum hourly rate of pay to which he or she is entitled in accordance with this Act. The records shall be kept at the premises or place where his or her employee works or, if the employee works at two or more premises or places, the premises or place from which the activities that the employee is employed to carry on are principally directed. The records shall be retained for at least 3 years from the date of their making.	s22(1) 2000	on event	all	Irish Legislature
3	Statement of Average Hourly Rate of Pay	An employer shall, upon request from an employee, within 4 weeks after receiving the employee’s request, give to the employee a written statement of the employee’s average hourly rate of pay during any pay reference period falling within the 12 month period immediately preceding the request.	s23(4) 2000	on event	all	Irish Legislature
3	Statement of Average Hourly Rate of Pay	The statement shall contain details of: (1) the reckonable pay components paid or allowed to the employee, (2) the working hours of the employee calculated, (3) the average hourly pay actually paid or allowed to the employee, (4) the minimum hourly rate of pay to which the employee is entitled.	s23(4) 2000	on event	all	Irish Legislature

[149]Top Eleven Employment Law IOs —continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Businesses	Source of Initiative
3	Statement of Average Hourly Rate of Pay	The statement shall be signed and dated by or on behalf of the employer. A copy shall be kept by the employer for a period of 15 months beginning on the date on which the statement was given to the employee.	s23(5) 2000	on event	all	Irish Legislature
	Organisation of Working Time Act 1997
4	Records of Compliance	An employer shall keep such records, in such form, if any, as may be prescribed, as will show whether the provisions of this Act (and, where applicable, the Activities of Doctors in Training Regulations) are being complied with in relation to the employee. The records shall be retained by the employer for at least 3 years from the date of their making.	s25(1) 1997; EC (Organisation of Working Time)R 2004, Reg. 11(1)	on event	all	European (Directive 93/104/EC)
4	Records of Compliance	The records shall be kept at the premises or place where his or her employee works or, if the employee works at two or more premises or places, the premises or place from which the activities that the employee is employed to carry on are principally directed or controlled.	s25(1) 1997; EC (Organisation of Working Time)R 2004, Reg. 11(1)	on event	all	European (Directive 93/104/EC)
4	Records of Compliance	The records shall contain details of compliance with regard to: (1) daily rest periods, (2) rests and intervals at work, (3) weekly rest periods, (4) payment for Sunday work, (5) weekly working hours, (6) nightly working hours, (7) entitlement to, and times and pay for, annual leave, (8) entitlement to, and rate of pay for, public holidays, (9) payment of any holidays or public holidays compensation owing at the time of cesser of employment.	Ss11-16 and Ss19-23 1997	on event	all	European (Directive 93/104/EC)

[150]Top Eleven Employment Law IOs —continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Businesses	Source of Initiative
4	Form of Record of Compliance	The records shall contain the following particulars and documents: (1) the name of each employee concerned, (2) the employee’s PPS, (3) a brief statement of his or her duties as an employee, (4) a copy, as appropriate, of the statement provided to each employee concerned in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994, or any order or regulation made under that Act, that relates to him or her.	Organisation of Working Time (Records) R 2001, Reg. 3(a)	on event	all	European (Directive 93/104/EC)
	Protection of Employees (Fixed-Term Work) Act 2003
5	Written Statement of Employer	An employer of an employee on a fixed-term contract shall inform the employee in writing, as soon as practicable, of the objective condition determining the contract.	s8(1) 2003	on event	all	European (Directive 1999/70/EC)
5	Written Statement of Employer	Where an employer proposes to renew a fixed-term contract, the employer shall inform the fixed-term employee in writing of the objective grounds justifying the renewal of the fixed-term contract and the failure to offer a contract of indefinite duration, before the renewal of the contract.	s8(2) 2003	on event	all	European (Directive 1999/70/EC)
	Terms of Employment (Information) Acts 1994 and 2001
6	Written Statement of Terms of Employment	An employer shall, not later than 2 months after the commencement of an employee’s employment with the employer, give or cause to be given to the employee a statement in writing containing the particulars of the terms of the employee’s employment.	s3(1) 1994	on event	all	European (Directive 91/533/EEC)

[151]Top Eleven Employment Law IOs —continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Businesses	Source of Initiative
6	Written Statement of Terms of Employment	It shall include certain details: (1) the full names of the employee and employer, (2) the address of the employer in the State or, where appropriate, the address of the principal place of the relevant business of the employer in the State or the registered office, (3) the place of work or, where there is no fixed or main place of work, a statement specifying that the employee is required or permitted to work at various places, (4) the title of the job or nature of the work for which the employee is employed, (5) the date of commencement of the employee’s contract of employment, (6) in the case of a temporary contract of employment, the expected duration thereof or, if the contract of employment is for a fixed term, the date on which the contract expires.	s3(1)(a)-(f) 1994	on event	all	European (Directive 91/533/EEC)
6	Written Statement of Terms of Employment	It shall include certain details: (1) the rate or method of calculation of the employee’s remuneration and the pay reference period for the purposes of the National Minimum Wage Act 2000, (2) that the employee may, under section 23 of the National Minimum Wage Act 2000, request from the employer a written statement of the employee’s average hourly rate of pay for any pay reference period as provided in that section.	s44 National Minimum Wage Act 2000	on event	all	Irish Legislature

[152]Top Eleven Employment Law IOs —continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Businesses	Source of Initiative
6	Written Statement of Terms of Employment	It shall include certain details: (1) the length of the intervals between the times at which remuneration is paid, (2) any terms or conditions relating to — (i) hours of work (including overtime), (ii) paid leave (other than paid sick leave), (iii) incapacity for work due to sickness or injury and paid sick leave, and pensions and pension schemes, (3) the period of notice which the employee is required to give and entitled to receive (whether by or under statute or under the terms of the employee’s contract of employment) to determine the employee’s contract of employment or, where this cannot be indicated when the information is given, the method for determining such periods of notice, (4) a reference to any collective agreements which directly affect the terms and conditions of the employee’s employment including, where the employer is not a party to such agreements, particulars of the bodies or institutions by whom they were made.	s3(1)(h)-(m) 1994	on event	all	European (Directive 91/533/EEC)
6	Written Statement of Terms of Employment	It shall be signed and dated by or on the behalf of the employer.	s3(4) 1994	on event	all	European (Directive 91/533/EEC)
6	Written Statement of Terms of Employment	A copy of the statement shall be retained by the employer during the period of the employee’s employment and for a period of 1 year thereafter.	s3(5) 1994	on event	all	European (Directive 91/533/EEC)

[153]Top Eleven Employment Law IOs —continued

No.	Obligation	Description	Reference	Compliance	Businesses	Source of Initiative
7	Notification of Changes to Terms of Employment	Whenever a change is made or occurs in any of the particulars of the statement furnished by an employer to an employee, the employer shall notify the employee in writing of the nature and date of the change as soon as may be thereafter, but not later than one month after the change takes effect, or, where the change is consequent on the employee being required to work outside the State for a period of more than 1 month, the time of the employee’s departure.	s5(1) 1994	on event	all	European (Directive 91/533/EEC)
7	Notification of Changes to Terms of Employment	Not required in relation to a change occurring in provisions of statutes or instruments made under statute or of any other laws or of any administrative provisions or collective agreements referred to in the statement.	s5(2) 1994	on event	all	European (Directive 91/533/EEC)
	Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977 to 2007
8	Notification of Grounds for Dismissal	Where an employee is dismissed, an employer shall, if so requested, furnish to the employee within 14 days of the request, particulars in writing of the principal grounds for dismissal.	s9 1993	on event	all	Irish Legislature
	General Provisions
9	Information to Inspectors and Authorised Officers	An inspector or authorised officer may require an employer or the representative of such employer to make available to him or her any such records, documents or other information as he or she deems necessary to show compliance with the provisions of the Act.	s33(2)(c) National Minimum Wage Act 2000	on event	all	Irish Legislature
10	”	”	s8(3)(c) Organisation of Working Time Act 1997	on event	all	European (Directive 93/104/EC)
11	”	”	s9(1)(c) Payment of Wages Act 1991	on event	all	Irish Legislature

[154]Top 15 Health & Safety Information Obligations

No.	Obligation	Rating (Max = 81)	Reference	Business Sector	IO Category
1	Classification, packaging & labelling of chemicals	54	Reg 6 European Communities (Classification, Packaging, Labelling and Notification of Dangerous Substances) Regulations, 2003 to 2008 (S.I. Nos 116 of 2003, 25 of 2006, and 272 of 2008)	Manufacturing	Application or Notification to or Communication with Authority
2	Hazard warning labels	54	Reg 9 (3) Safety, Health And Welfare At Work (Chemical Agents) Regulations, 2001 (S.I. No. 619 of 2001)	All	Signs & Notices
3	Record of inspections of work equipment	54	Reg. 30 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (General Application) Regulations 2007 (S.I. No. 299 of 2007)	All	Registers & Records
4	Register of reports of examination of lifting equipment	54	Reg. 54(2)(a) of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (General Application) Regulations 2007 (S.I. No. 299 of 2007)	All	Registers & Records
5	Registration of chemicals	54	Chemical Act 2008 (Number 13 of 2008) and TITLE II Chapter 1 of EC Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)	Manufacturing	Application or Notification to or Communication with Authority
6	Safety and Health Plan for construction projects	54	Reg. 16 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 504 of 2006)	Construction	Plan or Procedure or Risk Assessment
7	Safety data sheets for chemicals	54	Chemical Act 2008 (Number 13 of 2008) and Article 31 of EC Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)	All	Notice to or Communication with other parties
8	Safety statement	54	S.20 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005	All	Plan or Procedure or Risk Assessment

[155]Top 15 Health & Safety Information Obligations — continued

No.	Obligation	Rating(Max = 81)	Reference	Business Sector	IO Category
9	Confirmation of the verification of construction workers certificates	36	Reg. 25 (2)(b) of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 504 of 2006)	Construction	Application or Notification to or Communication with Authority
10	Information for pregnant employees or those that have recently given birth	36	Reg. 152 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (General Application) Regulations 2007 (S.I. No. 299 of 2007)	All	Communication or Training
11	Notification of injuries or death	36	Reg. 59 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (General Application) Regulations 1993 (S.I. No. 44 of 1993)	All	Application or Notification to or Communication with Authority
12	Record of notification of accident or dangerous occurrence	36	Reg. 17 (1)(e) of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 504 of 2006)	Construction	Registers & Records
13	Risk assessment SAFETY STATEMENT (#13)	36	S.19 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005	All	Plan or Procedure or Risk Assessment
14	Safety File	36	Reg. 8(1) of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 504 of 2006)	Construction	Registers & Records
15	Written procedures for demolition operations on a construction site	36	Reg. 94 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 504 of 2006)	Construction	Plan or Procedure or Risk Assessment

117. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of companies which have applied for funding from the temporary job subsidy scheme; the number of jobs that will be subsidised; the number of applications accepted; the number rejected; the amount paid out to date; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36523/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The temporary Employment Subsidy Scheme applies to vulnerable but viable companies in the manufacturing or internationally traded service sectors. It will involve the payment of a subsidy to firms to retain an agreed level of jobs. After the deadline of the 4 September last, Enterprise Ireland, which is managing the scheme, received 561 eligible applications seeking employment subsidies for 9,130 jobs. Enterprise Ireland is considering these applications. As the first payments to successful applicants are due to commence in December of this year, no payments have been made to date.

118. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of companies which have applied for funding from the enterprise stabilisation fund; the number of applications accepted; the number rejected; the amount paid out to date; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36524/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The Government has approved a total of €100 million for the Enterprise Stabilisation Fund for 2009 and 2010. Some €50 million has been included in the Estimate of my Department for this purpose in 2009. Under the scheme, Enterprise Ireland may provide up to €500,000 to viable companies with robust business models that are facing difficulties as a result of the current economic environment. The fund supplies direct financial support to internationally trading enterprises that are investing in cost reduction or other measures to gain sales in overseas markets. Enterprise Ireland has approved approximately €44.5 million for 101 projects, of which €26 million has been paid to applicants to date. Enquiries have also been received from a further 100 companies. However, these enquiries have not as yet progressed to formal applications.

To date, ten projects have not been successful and alternative options have been reviewed with the respective companies. Eligible applicants are assessed by Enterprise Ireland based on business plans that demonstrate the potential long-term viability of the company and itsexport growth potential. The level of funding is determined based on the specific needs of each company, taking into account the specifics of the business plan, the level of internal and external funding available to the company and the potential benefit to the Irish economy.

119. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of people currently participating in the short-time training programme and the work placement programme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36525/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): Following extensive discussions with interested companies and employees in each FÁS region [157]who wish to avail of the short-time training programme, training courses with FETAC certification are being developed and tailored by FÁS to meet local needs. It is not anticipated that individuals on systematic short-time working will take up a place on their training course until next month at the earliest. In relation to the work placement programme, 52 individuals have started their work experience, 38 in Stream 1 (graduates) and 14 in Stream 2. Some 1,684 people have expressed an interest in the programme to date — 937 graduates have expressed an interest in participating in Stream 1, while 747 people have expressed an interest in Stream 2. FÁS currently has 403 posts available under this programme, 283 for Stream 1 (graduates) and 120 for Stream 2. FÁS is continuing to promote and co-ordinate the programme at both provider and participant level.

120. Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the entrepreneurial activity to date in 2009; the entrepreneurial activity for each of the past ten years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36537/09]

121. Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the breakdown of entrepreneurial activity in each county to date in 2009; the breakdown of entrepreneurial activity in each county for each of the past ten years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36538/09]

122. Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of entrepreneurial programmes which are run here; the number of entrepreneurial programmes which have been run in each of the past ten years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36539/09]

123. Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the agencies and bodies which run entrepreneurial programmes here; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36540/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): I propose to take Questions Nos. 120 to 123, inclusive, together.

The statistical information sought by the Deputy in relation to entrepreneurial programmes and entrepreneurial activity is not compiled or available in the format sought for the periods mentioned. Details in relation to the range of initiatives available in Ireland to support entrepreneurship were published by Forfás in October 2007. The report, “Mapping of Initiatives to Support Entrepreneurship in Ireland”, is available on the Forfás website at www.forfas.ie/media/forfas071023_ entrepreneurship_ initiatives.pdf. The report sets out an overview of entrepreneurship initiatives available in Ireland, many of which have been in operation for a number of years, including the Enterprise Education Initiatives in the primary, secondary and third level sectors; the Entrepreneurship Award Schemes supported by the education system and the business community; the initiatives for start-ups and training; as well as initiatives specifically for women and ethnic minorities administered by Government Departments and public sector bodies such as the Department of Social and Family Affairs; the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform; the 35 county and city enterprise boards; Enterprise Ireland; Shannon Development; FÁS; Údarás na Gaeltachta; the county enterprise funds; Teagasc; the business innovation centres; LEADER and the area partnerships. The majority of these initiatives continue to be provided.

[158]The Irish Global Entrepreneurship Monitor report provides details of entrepreneurial activity and sets these findings in an international setting. The report has been published
since 2001. The GEM report for 2008 is available on the Forfás website at www.forfas.ie/media/gem _report _2008.pdf. The report confirms that Ireland is an entrepreneurial nation and to the fore in Europe in its rate of early stage entrepreneurial activity
(7.6%) and its rate of established entrepreneurs (9%) among the adult population. With an average of 2,800 individuals setting up new businesses every month, entrepreneurial activity in Ireland remains high. A breakdown for the period 2001 to 2008 is set out in the Table 1 that follows this reply.

Section 2 and Tables 2.1 to 2.10 of the 2008 Irish Global Entrepreneurship Monitor report set out details on entrepreneurship in the regions of Ireland. Entrepreneurial activity can also be considered in the context of company formations and new VAT registrations for businesses. Table 2 that follows this reply provides details of new company registrations. These figures cannot give a comprehensive overview of all new entrepreneurial activity, as entrepreneurs who do not use a limited company structure would not be included. Table 3 that follows this reply provides details of new VAT registrations. These figures cannot give a comprehensive overview of all new entrepreneurial activity as registration for VAT applies to specific turnover thresholds and entrepreneurs below such thresholds would not be required to register. The activities and programmes of the various State development agencies in providing services to enterprises can also be seen as an indication of entrepreneurial activity. The significant allocations made through my Department to such agencies, to assist new and developing enterprises, is evidence of the strength of our entrepreneurial spirit in Ireland.

I wish to explain some of the terms used in Table 1 that follows this reply. “Nascent entrepreneurs” are those actively planning a new venture. Such entrepreneurs have done something during the previous 12 months to help start a new business that he or she will at least part own. Activities such as organising the start-up team, looking for equipment, saving money for the start-up or writing a business plan would be considered as active commitments to starting a business. The rate given in the table for nascent entrepreneurs is the rate for those in the adult population aged 18-64 years inclusive. “New firm entrepreneurs” are entrepreneurs who at least part own and manage a new business that is between four and 42 months old and have not paid salaries for longer than this period. These new ventures are in the first 42 months after the new venture has been set up. The rate given in the table for new firm entrepreneurs is the rate for those in the adult population aged 18-64 years inclusive. The figures for “early stage entrepreneurs” refers to the total rate of early stage entrepreneurial activity among the adult population aged 18-64 years inclusive.

In some instances, this rate is less than the combined percentages for nascent and new firm entrepreneurs. This is because, in circumstances where respondents qualify as both nascent and new firm entrepreneurs, they are counted only once. In addition to those who are currently involved in the early-stages of a business, there are many individuals who have set up businesses they have continued to own and manage for a longer time. These individuals are referred to in the tables as “established business owners”, using an index which captures the percentage of individuals in a population that have set up businesses that they have continued to own and manage and which has paid wages or salaries for more than 42 months. The rate given in the table for established business owners is the rate for those in the adult population aged 18-64 years inclusive.

[159]Table 1: Entrepreneurial Activity GEM Reports

Year	NASCENT Entrepreneurs 1	New Firm Entrepreneurs 2	Early Stage Entrepreneurs 3	Established Firm Entrepreneurs 4
	%	%	%
2001	7.2	4.8	12.1	N/A
2002	5.7	4.2	9.1	8.1
2003	5.1	3.8	8.1	6.7
2004	4.4	3.6	7.7	6.5
2005	5.7	4.7	9.8	8.1
2006	4.5	2.9	7.4	7.8
2007	4.2	4.2	8.2	9.0
2008	3.3	4.3	7.6	9.0

Table 2: Company Registrations

Year	Incorporation Of New Companies
1999	18,761
2000	18,232
2001	14,345
2002	13,845
2003	14,388
2004	15,690
2005	17,302
2006	19,297
2007	18,797
2008	14,784
2009 (Jan-Sept)	9,956

Table 3: New VAT Registrations

Year	New VAT Registrations
2000	19,061
2001	25,472
2002	25,014
2003	28,501
2004	31,937
2005	35,842
2006	39,827
2007	33,757
2008	25,727

124. Deputy Phil Hogan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the financial and grant assistance paid from EU and national sources in respect of a [160]factory (details supplied) in County Kilkenny; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36552/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The company in question has not been grant aided by Enterprise Ireland in respect of its operation in Freshford, County Kilkenny. The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has informed me that no other national or EU grant was paid to this company in respect of its plant at Freshford, County Kilkenny. I will set out the facilities operated by the company and the assistance received in respect of them. A company operation (sheep processing) in Camolin, County Wexford has been paid approximately €86,000 in grants by Enterprise Ireland since 2003. The company has a second lamb processing plant at Navan, County Meath. Since 2003, no grant moneys have been provided towards this facility. A beef processing facility in Bunclody, County Wexford has been paid grants of approximately €74,000 by Enterprise Ireland since 2003. The company’s operations at Bunclody and Camolin were approved grants of €4.507 million and €3.544 million respectively under the Beef and Sheepmeat Fund announced by the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in May 2009.

125. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by herself and the Ministers of State at her Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36563/09]

Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Mary Coughlan): The total cost of official domestic travel incurred by all Ministers and Ministers of State at my Department from January 2007 to the end of September 2009 was as follows: 2007, €86,607.41; 2008, €121,543.63; and 2009 (to the end of September), €76,016.33. These figures include all identifiable costs incurred by the Ministers and Ministers of State which were paid for by my Department in relation to official domestic travel. Certain other travel-related costs, such as the provision of a car by the State for the Minister, are not borne by my Department.

126. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if she will support a matter (detail supplied) in Dublin 9. [36583/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Deputy Dara Calleary): The Redundancy Payments Section of my Department received statutory lump sum applications for the company concerned in July 2009. I understand that the claims are being processed. Subject to the necessary information being provided in support of the claims, I expect payment to issue to the claimants within the next two or three weeks. Currently, the average time it takes to process rebate applications from employers filed on-line is seven months while claims submitted by post are taking eight months. The Redundancy Payments Section of my Department is processing applications filed on-line from March 2009 and those submitted by post from February 2009.

In respect of lump sum payments paid directly to employees in instances where employers are unable to pay the statutory redundancy entitlements, the redundancy payments section is, in general, processing claims dating from June 2009. Given the unprecedented increase in redundancy payment claims lodged with my Department since late 2008, it has proved impossible to maintain the customer service targets that previously obtained. The scale of the chal[161]lenge is evident from the statistics that show incoming redundancy claims with a cumulative figure for the first nine months of 2009 at 60,785 an increase of 122% on the same period last year (27,373). This figure of 60,785 exceeds the claims lodged for the full year 2008 (40,607). Indeed, 2008 itself was an exceptional year compared to earlier years, when claims received were of the order of 25,000.

Efforts continue to be made by the Tánaiste and I to deliver more acceptable turnaround processing times for redundancy payments given the difficulties that this gives rise to for both individual employees and the business community. Measures already taken include the reassignment of 26.7 additional staff (full-time equivalents) from other areas of the Department to the redundancy payments area since early 2009 with an ongoing review of trends and demands — the current number of staff serving in the redundancy payments section in terms of full-time equivalents is 53.8; the prioritisation of the Department’s overtime budget towards staff in the redundancy payments section to tackle the backlog outside normal hours; the establishment of a special call handling facility to deal with the huge volume of telephone calls from people and businesses who are naturally concerned about their payments, using the facilities and co-operation of the National Employment Rights Authority — this centre has received an average of 12,500 calls per month this year with an estimated 60% relating to redundancy payments; the provision of better quality information relating to current processing times on the Department’s website; and an engagement with the Revenue Commissioners to facilitate the offset of redundancy rebate payments by employers against outstanding tax liabilities with the Revenue Commissioners. The Tánaiste and I will continue to monitor closely the impact of these changes against the continuing influx of redundancy claims and will consider further measures to deal with the situation if current measures prove to be inadequate.

127. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance if he will amend the rules for construction tenders by public bodies and local authorities in order that small building contracts of less than €5.25 million can be awarded to any one of a short-list of approved contractors and in the case of civil engineering projects up to a limit of €15 million to apply an open tender process subject to firms meeting agreed minimum standards; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36586/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): National guidelines dealing with the procurement of public works projects below the EU financial threshold can be found in the “Procurement Process for Works Contractors, GN 2.3” of the Capital Works Management Framework on my Department’s website, www.constructionprocurement.gov.ie. This document provides guidance on the short listing of approved contractors (i.e. the restricted procedure) which is permitted as a standard option for public works contracts valued at less than €5.15 million (EU threshold). The use of short listing can also be used as a standard option for projects above the EU thresholds under Irish and European law.

In relation to allowing all firms that meet the minimum suitability standards participate in tender competitions for public works contracts, including civil engineering contracts, the guidance also allows this approach to be used by contracting authorities as a standard option. Further information on the use of suitability assessment methods for the works contracts is available in the Capital Works Management Framework published on my Department’s website mentioned above. In addition, in light of pressures facing SMEs, my Department, in consultation with the Government contracts committee for construction, is finalising guidance to public authorities on the determination of appropriate levels of financial capacity of tenderers relevant to particular contracts.

128. Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Finance the amounts of money that have been spent annually by the national lottery in the years 2000 to 2006; the percentages of these annual amounts that have been spent annually by the national lottery on local projects in the same years in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36366/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): The surplus generated by the National Lottery is surrendered to the Exchequer and is allocated to a number of Departments in the context of the annual Estimates process. The attached copies of Appendix 1 of the Revised Estimates for Public Services for each of the years 2000 to 2004 show the allocation of National Lottery funding in each of these years, by Department. The annual amounts are 2000, €152 million; 2001, €167 million; 2002, €220 million; 2003, €201 million; and 2004, €236 million.

Since 2005, the total allocation for subheads which had formerly been funded entirely from the proceeds of the National Lottery has exceeded the funds available from the National Lottery. Therefore, the subheads in Appendix 1 for subsequent years include both National Lottery and Exchequer funding. In 2005, approximately 64% of total expenditure on these subheads, or €211 million, came from the National Lottery, while in 2006 the corresponding figure was 50% or €200 million. What might be regarded as local projects are mainly funded under the headings “Supports for Community and Voluntary Sector” and “Local and Community Development Programmes” under the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs and the “Sports Capital Programme” under the Department of Arts, Sport and Tourism. On this basis, the percentage of National Lottery funding spent annually on local projects is as follows: 2000, 32%; 2001, 39%; 2002, 42%; 2003, 44%; 2004, 47%; 2005, 43%; and 2006, 35%.

[163]Table 1 — 2002

APPENDIX I: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2001 Provisional Outturn			2002 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
6. Office of the Minister for Finance
L. — Charitable Lotteries Fund	7,618	—	7,618	7,618	—	7,618

25. Environment and Local Government
B.3 — Grant-in-aid Fund for Task Force on Special Housing Aid for the Elderly	—	10,993	10,993	—	11,903	11,903
B.4 — Communal Facilities in Voluntary Housing Schemes	—	1,604	1,604	—	1,732	1,732
Subtotal:—	—	12,597	12,597	—	13,635	13,635
26. Office of the Minister for Education and Science.
B.1 — Grant-in-Aid Fund for General expenses of Adult Education Organisations	722	—	722	762	—	762
B.9 — Grant-in-Aid Fund for general expenses of youth and sport organisations and other expenditure in relation to youth activities	23,347	—	23,347	25,892	—	25,892
B.10 — Grants to Colleges providing courses in Irish	1,167	—	1,167	1,185	—	1,185
B.11 — Publications in Irish	237	—	237	245	—	245
B.14 — Grant-in-Aid Fund for General Expenses of Cultural, Organisations Scientific and Educational Organisations	909	—	909	830	—	830
Subtotal:—	26,382	—	26,382	28,914	—	28,914
33. Health and Children
B.7 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	9,608	—	9,608	9,944	—	9,944
K.2 — Building, Equipping and Furnishing of Health Facilities	—	2,539	2,539	—	2,539	2,539
Subtotal:—	9,608	2,539	12,147	9,944	2,539	12,483

[164]Table 1 — 2002 —continued

APPENDIX I: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2001 Provisional Outturn			2002 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
34. Enterprise, Trade and Employment
Q. — Participation in World Exposition in Hanover — Expo 2000	758	—	758	100	—	100

35. Tourism, Sport and Recreation
C.1 — Grants for sporting bodies and the provision of sports and recreational facilities	—	26,994	26,994	—	37,414	37,414
		.
C.5 — Irish Sports Council — General Assistance to Sports Organisations and other expenditure in relation to sports activities (Grant-in-Aid)	18,265	—	18,265	24,261	—	24,261
Subtotal:—	18,265	26,994	45,259	24,261	37,414	61,675
36. Defence
Y. — Coiste an Asgard	640	—	640	625	—	625

40. Social, Family and Community Affairs
U. —Grants for Community and Voluntary Service	37,362	—	37,362	47,104	—	47,104

41. An Chomhairle Ealaíon
B. — Grant under Section (5) (1) (a) of the National Lottery Act, 1986 (Grant-in-Aid)	8,888	5,079	13,967	8,888	4,679	13,567

42. An Roinn Ealaíon, Oidhreachta, Gaeltachta agus Oiléan
I —Íocaíocht le Ciste na Gaeilge (Deontas-i-gCabhair)	2,222	—	2,222	2,227	—	2,227
P.2. — Grant-in-Aid for An Chomhairle Oidhreachta (Heritage Council)	2,012	5,511	7,523	2,083	5,741	7,824
Subtotal:—	4,234	5,511	9,745	4,310	5,741	10,051
Grand Total:—	113,755	52,720	166,475	131,764	64,008	195,772

[165]TABLE 2 — 2003

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2002 Provisional Outturn			2003 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
6. Office of the Minister for Finance
L. — Charitable Lotteries Fund	7,618	—	7,618	7,618	—	7,618

25. Environment and Local Government
B.3 — Grant-in-aid Fund for Task Force on Special Housing Aid for the Elderly	—	11,903	11,903	—	11,536	11,536
B.4— Communal Facilities in Voluntary Housing Schemes	—	1,152	1,152	—	1,900	1,900
E.2 — Grant-in-Aid for An Chomhairle Oidhreachta (Heritage Council)	2,083	5,741	7,824	1,971	5,077	7,048
Subtotal:—	2,083	18,796	20,879	1,971	18,513	20,484
26. Education and Science.
B.1 — Grant-in-Aid Fund for general expenses of Adult Education Organisations	762	—	762	800		800
B.9 — Grant-in-Aid Fund for general expenses of youth and sport organisations and other expenditure in relation to youth activities	25,711	—	25,711	27,123	—	27,123
B.10 — Grants to Colleges providing courses in Irish	1,146	—	1,146	1,185	—	1,185
B.11 — Publications in Irish.	244	—	244	66	—	66
B.14 — Grant-in-Aid Fund for general expenses of Cultural, Organisations Scientific and Educational Organisations	818	—	818	291	—	291
Subtotal:—	28,681	—	28,681	29,465	—	29,465
33. Health and Children
B.7 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	9,944	—	9,944	10,193	—	10,193
J.2 — Building, Equipping and Furnishing of Health Facilities	—	2,539	2,539	—	2,539	2,539
Subtotal:—	9,944	2,539	12,483	10,193	2,539	12,732

[166]TABLE 2 — 2003 —continued

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2002 Provisional Outturn			2003 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
34. Enterprise, Trade and Employment
Q.1 — Participation in World Exposition in Hanover — Expo 2000	40	—	40	16	—	16

35. Arts, Sport and Tourism
C.1 — Grants for sporting bodies and the provision of sports and recreational facilities	—	61,323	61,323	—	61,000	61,000
C.4 — Irish Sports Council — General Assistance to Sports Organisations and other expenditure in relation to sports activities (Grant-in-Aid)	27,261	—	27,261	26,597	—	26,597
Subtotal:—	27,261	61,323	88,584	26,597	61,000	87,597
36. Defence
X. — Coiste an Asgard	625	—	625	657	—	657

40. Social and Family Affairs
Q. — Money Advice and Budgeting Service (a)	9,287	—	9,287	—	—	—
R.3 — Family Resource Centres (a)	4,384	—	4,384	—	—	—
U. — Miscellaneous Services (part) (a)	762	—	762	—	—	—
Subtotal:—	14,433	—	14,433	—	—	—
42. An Roinn Gnóthaí Pobail, Tuaithe agus Gaeltachta
C. —Íocaíocht le Ciste na Gaeilge (Deontas-i-gCabhair)	2,403	—	2,403	2,400	—	2,400
J. — Grants for Community and Voluntary Service	30,431	—	30,431	29,740	—	29,740
Subtotal:—	32,834	—	32,834	32,140	—	32,140
43. An Chomhairle Ealaíon
B. — Grant under Section (5) (1) (a) of the National
Lottery Act, 1986 (Grant-in-Aid)	8,888	4,679	13,567	11,249	2,000	13,249
Grand Total:—	132,407	87,337	219,744	119,890	84,052	203,942

[167] TABLE 3 — 2004

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2003 Provisional Outturn			2004 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
6. Office of the Minister for Finance
L. — Charitable Lotteries Fund	7,618	—	7,618	7,618	—	7,618

25. Environment, Heritage and Local Government
B.3 — Grant-in-aid Fund for Task Force on Special Housing Aid for the Elderly	—	11,536	11,536	—	11,599	11,599
B.4 — Communal Facilities in Voluntary Housing Schemes	—	1,900	1,900	—	2,069	2,069
E.2 — Grant-in-aid for An Chomhairle Oidhreachta (Heritage Council)	1,971	5,077	7,048	2,000	5,100	7,100
Subtotal:—	1,971	18,513	20,484	2,000	18,768	20,768
26. Education and Science
B.1 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Adult Education Organisations	800	—	800	822		822
B.9 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of youth and sport organisations and other expenditure in relation to youth activities	27,121	—	27,121	28,624	—	28,624
B.10 — Grants to Colleges providing courses in Irish	1,177	—	1,177	1,185	—	1,185
B.11 — Publications in Irish	66	—	66	66	—	66
B.14 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Cultural, Scientific and Educational Organisations	272	—	272	263	—	263
Subtotal:—	29,436	—	29,436	30,960	—	30,960
27. An Roinn Gnóthaí Pobail, Tuaithe agus Gaeltachta
C. —Íocaíocht le Ciste na Gaeilge	2,326	—	2,326	2,675	—	2,675
K. — Grants for Community and Voluntary Service	26,922	—	26,922	27,309	—	27,309
Subtotal:—	29,248	—	29,248	29,984	—	29,984

[168] TABLE 3 — 2004 —continued

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2003 Provisional Outturn			2004 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
33. Health and Children
B.7 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	10,193	—	10,193	10,478	—	10,478
J.2 — Building, Equipping and Furnishing of Health Facilities ...	—	2,539	2,539	—	2,539	2,539
Subtotal:—	10,193	2,539	12,732	10,478	2,539	13,017
35. Arts, Sport and Tourism
C.1 — Grants for sporting bodies and the provision of sports and recreational facilities	98	61,000	61,098	—	63,597	63,597
C.4 — Irish Sports Council — General Assistance to Sports Organisations and other expenditure in relation to sports activities (Grant-in-Aid)	26,597	—	26,597	29,000	—	29,000
D.10 — Grants to An Chomhairle Ealaíon	11,249	2,000	13,249	17,008	3,500	20,508
Subtotal:—	37,944	63,000	100,944	46,008	67,097	113,105
36. Defence
X. — Coiste an Asgard	657	—	657	693	—	693
Total:—	117,067	84,052	201,119	127,741	88,404	216,145

[169]TABLE 4 — 2005

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2004 Provisional Outturn			2005 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
6. Office of the Minister for Finance
L. — Payments to the Promoters of certain Charitable Lotteries	7,618	—	7,618	7,730	—	7,730

25. Environment, Heritage and Local Government
B.3 — Fund for Task Force on Special Housing Aid for the Elderly	—	11,599	11,599	—	11,947	11,947
B.4 — Communal Facilities in Voluntary Housing Schemes	—	2,069	2,069	—	2,131	2,131
E.2 —Grant for An Chomhairle Oidhreachta (Heritage Council)	2,000	5,100	7,100	2,050	5,270	7,320
Subtotal:—	2,000	18,768	20,768	2,050	19,348	21,398
26. Education and Science.
B.1 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Adult Education Organisations	822	—	822	848	—	848
B.9 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of youth and sport organisations and other expenditure in relation to youth activities	28,622	—	28,622	33,889	—	33,889
B.10 — Grants to Colleges providing courses in Irish	1,151	—	1,151	1,209	—	1,209
B.11 — Publications in Irish	66	—	66	69	—	69
B.14 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Cultural, Scientific and Educational Organisations	254	—	254	269	—	269
Subtotal:—	30,915	—	30,915	36,284	—	36,284

[170]TABLE 4 — 2005 —continued

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2004 Provisional Outturn			2005 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
27. Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs
C. — Payments to Ciste na Gaeilge	2,741	—	2,741	3,362		3,362
K. — Grants for Community and Voluntary Service	29,964	—	29,964	32,026	—	32,026
Subtotal:—	32,705	—	32,705	35,388	—	35,388
35. Arts, Sport and Tourism
C.1 — Grants for sporting bodies and the provision of sports and recreational facilities	—	80,704	80,704	—	61,926	61,926
C.4 — Irish Sports Council — General Assistance to Sports Organisations and other expenditure in relation to sports activities (Grant-in-aid)	29,000	—	29,000	32,573	—	32,573
D.10 — An Chomhairle Ealaíon (Grant-in-Aid).	17,008	3,500	20,508	19,412	3,588	23,000
Subtotal:—	46,008	84,204	130,212	51,985	65,514	117,499
36. Defence
Y. — Coiste an Asgard (Grant-in-Aid) ...	693	—	693	1,123	—	1,123

39. Health and Children
B.2 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	3,536	—	3,536	3,722	—	3,722

40. Health Service Executive
B.11 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	6,942	—	6,942	7,018	—	7,018
C.2 — Building, Equipping and Furnishing of Health Facilities	—	2,539	2,539	—	2,539	2,539
Subtotal:—	6,942	2,539	9,481	7,018	2,539	9,557
Grand Total:—	130,417	105,511	235,928	145,300	87,401	232,701

[171]TABLE 5 — 2006

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2005 Provisional Outturn			2006 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
6. Office of the Minister for Finance
L. — Payments to the Promoters of certain Charitable Lotteries	7,729	—	7,729	8,618	—	8,618

25. Environment, Heritage and Local Government
B.3 — Fund for Task Force on Special Housing Aid for the Elderly	—	11,024	11,024	—	12,141	12,141
B.4 — Communal Facilities in Voluntary Housing Schemes	—	2,066	2,066	—	1,977	1,977
E.2 — Grant for An Chomhairle Oidhreachta (Heritage Council)	1,891	4,863	6,754	1,699	4,313	6,012
Subtotal:—	1,891	17,953	19,844	1,699	18,431	20,130
26. Education and Science.
B.1 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Adult Education Organisations	782		782	701	—	701
B.9 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of youth and sport organisations and other expenditure in relation to youth activities	31,267	—	31,267	28,087	—	28,087
B.10 — Grants to Colleges providing courses in Irish	1,046	—	1,046	978	—	987
B.14 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Cultural, Scientific and Educational Organisations	234		234	218		218
Publications in Irish	64		64	—		—
Subtotal:—	33,393	—	33,393	29,984	—	29,984
27. Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs
C. — Payments to Ciste na Gaeilge.	3,016	—	3,016	2,781		2,781
K1. — Grants for Community and Voluntary Service	29,552	—	29,552	30,033	—	30,033
Subtotal:—	32,568	—	32,568	32,814	—	32,814

[172]TABLE 5 — 2006 — continued

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2005 Provisional Outturn			2006 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
35. Arts, Sport and Tourism
C.1 — Grants for sporting bodies and the provision of sports and recreational facilities		52,395	52,395	—	45,858	45,858
C.4 — Irish Sports Council — General Assistance to Sports Organisations and other expenditure in relation to sports activities (Grant-in-Aid)	30,056	—	30,056	31,539	—	31,539
D.7 — An Chomhairle Ealaíon (Grant-in-Aid)			21,223	18,504	990	19,494
Subtotal:—	30,056	52,395	103,674	50,043	46,848	96,891
36. Defence
Y. —Coiste an Asgard (Grant-in-Aid)	1,036	—	1,036	606	—	608

39. Health and Children
B.2 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	3,434	—	3,434	3,085	—	3,084

40. Health Service Executive
B.11 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	6,476	—	6,476	5,818	—	5,813
C.2 — Building, Equipping and Furnishing of Health Facilities	—	2,343	2,343	—	2,053	2,053
Subtotal:—	6,476	2,343	8,819	5,818	2,053	7,871
Grand Total:—	116,583		210,497	132,667	67,333	200,000

[173]TABLE 6 — 2007

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2005 Provisional Outturn			2006 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
6. Office of the Minister for Finance
L. — Payments to the Promoters of certain Charitable Lotteries	7,729	—	7,729	8,618	—	8,618

25. Environment, Heritage and Local Government
B.3 — Fund for Task Force on Special
Housing Aid for the Elderly	—	11,024	11,024	—	12,141	12,141
B.4 — Communal Facilities in Voluntary Housing Schemes	—	2,066	2,066	—	1,977	1,977
E.2 — Grant for An Chomhairle Oidhreachta (Heritage Council)	1,891	4,863	6,754	1,699	4,313	6,012
Subtotal:—	1,891	17,953	19,844	1,699	18,431	20,130
26. Education and Science
B.1 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Adult Education Organisations	782		782	701	—	701
B.9 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of youth and sport organisations and other expenditure in relation to youth activities	31,267	—	31,267	28,087	—	28,087
B.10 — Grants to Colleges providing courses in Irish	1,046	—	1,046	978	—	987
B.14 — Grant-in-aid Fund for general expenses of Cultural, Scientific and Educational Organisations	234		234	218		218
Publications in Irish	64		64	—		—
Subtotal:—	33,393	—	33,393	29,984	—	29,984

[174]TABLE 6 — 2007 —continued

Appendix 1: NATIONAL LOTTERY ALLOCATIONS

Vote/Subhead	2005 Provisional Outturn			2006 Estimate
	Current	Capital	Total	Current	Capital	Total
	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000	€000
27. Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs
C. — Payments to Ciste na Gaeilge	3,016	—	3,016	2,781		2,781
K1. — Grants for Community and Voluntary Service	29,552	—	29,552	30,033	—	30,033
Subtotal:—	32,568	—	32,568	32,814	—	32,814
35. Arts, Sport and Tourism
C.1 — Grants for sporting bodies and the provision of sports and recreational facilities		52,395	52,395	—	45,858	45,858
C.4 — Irish Sports Council — General Assistance to Sports Organisations and other expenditure in relation to sports activities (Grant-in-Aid)	30,056	—	30,056	31,539	—	31,539
D.7 — An Chomhairle Ealaíon (Grant-in-Aid)			21,223	18,504	990	19,494
Subtotal:—	30,056	52,395	103,674	50,043	46,848	96,891
36. Defence
Y. — Coiste an Asgard (Grant-in-Aid)	1,036	—	1,036	606	—	608

39. Health and Children
B.2 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	3,434	—	3,434	3,085	—	3,084

40. Health Service Executive
B.11 — Grants to Health Agencies and other similar organisations	6,476	—	6,476	5,818	—	5,813
C.2 — Building, Equipping and Furnishing of Health Facilities	—	2,343	2,343	—	2,053	2,053
Subtotal:—	6,476	2,343	8,819	5,818	2,053	7,871
Grand Total:—	116,583		210,497	132,667	67,333	200,000

129. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36381/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): My Department has not incurred any costs associated with leaflet, design production, delivery and other related costs in respect of my own constituency office in the period since I was appointed Minister for Finance in May 2008 to date in 2009. This is also the case in respect of my predecessor for the period 2007 to May 2008. I have been informed by the Office of Public Works that they have not incurred any costs associated with leaflet, design, production, delivery and other related costs in respect of the constituency office of the Minister of State, Deputy Mansergh, in the period since he was appointed. This is also the case in respect of his predecessors for the period 2007 to May 2008.

130. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36395/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): In the time available, it has not been possible to provide the information requested by the Deputy. Every effort is being made to collate the information and I will reply directly to the Deputy when this process is completed.

131. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will respond to correspondence (details supplied). [36407/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Finance (Deputy Martin Mansergh): The Commissioners of Public Works are progressing the matter and will issue a response shortly.

132. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Finance the estimate of the annual savings in 2010 to 2013, over and above those secured through the suspension of the national pay agreement, of cuts in public sector pay (detail supplied). [36415/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): I take it that the Deputy’s question assumes that the pay cuts mentioned at the various thresholds would apply to the entire salary and not just to the part of salary which exceeds the relevant threshold. On this basis, it is estimated that the annual savings would be as follows: Option A, €800 million; Option B, €650 million; and Option C, €550 million. It should be noted that the numbers at different salary bands vary from time to time depending on matters such as incremental salary movement, retirements etc.

133. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance when an application for a tax refund by a person (details supplied) in Dublin 9 will be decided; and the reason for the delay in processing this application. [36439/09]

[176]Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that no application for a tax refund has been received to date from this person.

134. Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Finance if he will ensure that the proposed National Asset Management Agency legislation provides for a whistleblowers’ charter to cover staff within NAMA, the covered institutions, debtors, advisers and service providers in order to ensure these parties all operate to highest professional and ethical standards; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36469/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): There are substantial provisions in the NAMA Bill to facilitate the disclosure of information and protect those involved. Section 199 allows for the appropriate disclosure of confidential information, by a person acting in good faith, to law enforcement authorities. Section 200 requires NAMA to inform the enforcement authorities where NAMA suspects that a participating institution may have committed a criminal offence or contravened certain specified laws. The Bill also provides for the publication of Codes of Practice by NAMA within 3 months of its establishment governing various matters. The Codes will include a code on the conduct of officers in NAMA. Furthermore, section 43 of the Bill provides that NAMA should seek to ensure that its expert advisors and service providers shall operate to the highest standards of integrity, fairness and professionalism.

135. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the cost of creating a new tax band for all income between €36,400 and €40,000 for a single person and the equivalent for a couple of 30%, of 33% and of 35%; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36479/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): It is assumed that the threshold for the proposed new tax bands mentioned by the Deputy would not alter the existing standard rate band structure applying to single and widowed persons, to lone parents and married couples. I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the estimated full year cost to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2010 incomes, of the introduction of these new rates of 30%, 33% and 35% could be of the order of €175 million, €125 million and €95 million respectively, depending on how each band is structured. Given the current band structures, there would be major issues to be worked out as to how such a new rate could be integrated in practice into the current system and how this would affect the relative position of different types of income earners. The figures are estimates from the Revenue tax-forecasting model using actual data for the year 2007 adjusted as necessary for income and employment trends for the year 2010. They are therefore provisional and likely to be revised.

136. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the cost of creating a new tax band for all income between €36,400 and €44,000 for a single person and the equivalent for a couple of 30%, of 33% and of 35%; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36480/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): It is assumed that the threshold for the proposed new tax bands mentioned by the Deputy would not alter the existing standard rate band structure applying to single and widowed persons, to lone parents and married couples. I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the estimated full year cost to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2010 incomes, of the introduction of these new rates of 30%, 33% and 35% could be of the order of €335 million, €240 million and €180 million respectively, depending on how each band is structured. Given the current band structures, there would be [177]major issues to be worked out as to how such a new rate could be integrated in practice into the current system and how this would affect the relative position of different types of income earners. The figures are estimates from the Revenue tax-forecasting model using actual data for the year 2007 adjusted as necessary for income and employment trends for the year 2010. They are therefore provisional and likely to be revised.

137. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance his views on the common pool for recruitment to promotional positions in local authorities, the Health Service Executive and vocational educational committees amongst others; if he will provide more promotional positions to open competition; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36481/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): The common recruitment system for Clerical/Administrative grades has been in place for over twenty years. The system provides for the filling of certain posts (at Grade IV to VII level) by competition confined to employees of Health Boards, Local Authorities, VECs, Institutes of Technology and certain other health and local government agencies (known as the “Common Recruitment Pool”). Issues in relation to the common recruitment pool were addressed in the Social Partnership Agreement “Sustaining Progress” when the social partners agreed to conduct a cross-sectoral review of recruitment issues pertinent to the grades concerned including the issue of greater accessibility and the introduction of a graduate entry level.

The recommendations of the Review Group established to review the issues were reflected in the discussions and agreement reached on the successor social partnership agreement “Towards 2016” concluded by the social partners. The “Towards 2016” Agreement provides for the implementation of arrangements whereby 20% of the posts at Grades V to VII would be filled by open competition, specialist posts would continue to be filled by open competition and to provide for recruitment and entry at graduate level. Under the “Towards 2016” Agreement the implementation of the provisions regarding the common recruitment pool is a matter for the relevant sectors where the pool operates.

138. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which the National Asset Management Agency will take into account planning permissions attached to undeveloped sites in valuing assets that it will buy from the banks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36493/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): Section 74 of the NAMA Bill provides that in determining the long-term economic value of a bank asset, one of the factors NAMA will consider will be the market value of the property. Section 77 provides that in making valuation regulations the Minister may have regard to land and planning considerations that may exert an influence on the future value of the asset concerned. Clearly, if planning permission is attached to a site this will affect the determination of its value.

139. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the cost of a wine, beer and spirit licence for retailers, publicans and restaurateurs for each year since 1997 to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36494/09]

[178]Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): The rates of excise duty on liquor licences that were in force in 1997 are set out in column A of the table below. There has been no increase in the meantime in the rate of duty that applies to retailers’ on-licences for the sale of spirits (that is, the standard pub licences).

The rates of duty for retailers’ off-licences for the sale of spirits, beer and wine were increased by the Finance Act 2008 and the Finance (No. 2) Act 2008: the revised rates are detailed in columns B and C, respectively, of the table. The rates of duty for retailers’ on-licences for the sale of beer and wine were also increased by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2008, and the revised rates are shown in column C of the table. The rate of duty that applies in respect of the granting of a special restaurant licence is unchanged since 1997. The duty payable in respect of the renewal of such a licence was increased by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2008. The revised rate is shown in column C of the table.

		A	B	C
Category of Licence	Level of Annual Turnover	Rate of Duty
		Rates 1997	Finance Act 2008	Finance (No. 2) Act 2008
		€	€	€
Retailers’ On-Licences:
Spirits (Publican’s Licence)	Less than €190,500	250
	€190,500 but less than €381,000	505
	€381,000 but less than €635,000	1,140
	€635,000 but less than €952,500	1,775
	€952,500 but less than €1,270,000	2,535
	€1.27m or more	3,805

Beer		250		500
Wine		250		500
Retailers’ Off-Licences:
Spirits		250	300	500
Beer		250	300	500
Wine		250	300	500
Special Restaurant Licence
New		3,805
Renewal		250		500

140. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance when he expects to receive the report of the review body on higher remuneration in the public sector; when he will act on it; if he will carry out a similar exercise for other cohorts of public sector employees; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36495/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): The report of the Review Body on Higher Remuneration in the Public Sector has been received by me and is under consideration at present. I have no plans to carry out a similar exercise for other public service groups.

141. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the cost of creating a new tax band for all income between €36,400 and €50,000 for a single person and the equivalent for a couple of 30%, of 33% and of 35%; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36529/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): It is assumed that the threshold for the proposed new tax bands mentioned by the Deputy would not alter the existing standard rate band structure applying to single and widowed persons, to lone parents and married couples. I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the estimated full year cost to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2010 incomes, of the introduction of these new rates of 30%, 33% and 35% could be of the order of €515 million, €375 million and €280 million respectively, depending on how each band is structured. Given the current band structures, there would be major issues to be worked out as to how such a new rate could be integrated in practice into the current system and how this would affect the relative position of different types of income earners. The figures are estimates from the Revenue tax-forecasting model using actual data for the year 2007 adjusted as necessary for income and employment trends for the year 2010. They are therefore provisional and likely to be revised.

142. Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Finance the timeline for phase two of the flood alleviation plan on the Munster Blackwater at Fermoy, County Cork; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36547/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Finance (Deputy Martin Mansergh): The Munster Blackwater (Fermoy South East and South West) Drainage Scheme Detailed Design phase is expected to start within the next month, and to be completed by mid-2010. The tender process for the procurement of the civil works contractor for the Scheme will take place shortly thereafter. It is anticipated that the construction phase will commence late next year or early in 2011.

143. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36565/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): There were no direct costs incurred by my Department for official domestic travel by me or my predecessor in 2007 and 2008. In 2009, the only cost to date for official domestic travel was €140.97 for air travel. As the Deputy is aware, a ministerial car is provided for my use, the cost of which is borne by the Department of Justice. The cost of the ministerial air transport service, which was used on two occasions for official domestic travel in the same period, is borne by the Department of Defence. Details of costs of official domestic travel undertaken by the Minister of State could not be compiled in the time available and will be forwarded directly to the Deputy.

144. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance if he will estimate the yield from taxing capital income on the same basis as earned income. [36587/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): It is assumed that the Deputy has in mind the replacement of the charge to capital gains tax on capital gains with income tax. I am informed [180]by the Revenue Commissioners that sufficient basic data are not available on which to base a precise estimate of the yield to the Exchequer from this proposal. However, on the basis of aggregated data and an assumed average marginal rate of income tax the estimated net full year yield is estimated to be in the region of €150 million, assuming no significant behavioural change on the part of the affected taxpayers. As CGT is very dependent on individual behaviour, any change in rate may not produce a corresponding increase or decrease in tax yield. In current economic conditions any estimate of additional yield must be treated with caution and, in such circumstances, increasing the rate could lead to a reduction in yield from the tax.

145. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance if he will estimate the yield from applying income tax to all off-course winnings, bets, prizes and the national lottery. [36588/09]

146. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance if he will estimate the yield from applying a tax of 20% on all off-course winnings, bets and prizes including the national lottery. [36589/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): I propose to take Questions Nos. 145 and 146 together.

Basic data on prizes is not available on which to base an accurate estimate of the yield to the Exchequer from these proposals. It is also difficult to understand how a tax of 20% or income tax could be applied to the value of bets placed; such bets are already subject to betting duty. However, in relation to the taxation of winnings from off-course betting, some rough estimates can be made.

The base to which betting duty applies is approximately €3 billion per annum and assuming a payout rate of 85% would lead to gross winnings of around €2.55 billion. A direct tax of 20% would produce a nominal full year gross yield of approximately €500 million. The application of income tax to such winnings, assuming an average marginal rate of tax, would produce a nominal full year gross yield of the order of €850 million. On a similar basis, the nominal full year gross yield from a direct tax of 20% on National Lottery prizes would be of the order of €90 million and from the application of income tax, assuming an average marginal rate of tax, would be approximately €150 million.

However, it must be stressed that these estimates assume no significant behavioural change on the part of the affected taxpayers and therefore may not be an accurate measure of the yield that would actually transpire in reality. Moreover, the application of income tax to these amounts could also lead to deductions for allowable losses, personal allowances and other relevant costs, thereby reducing the level of income that would actually be subject to tax. This would be a particular concern with respect to betting and gambling generally.

147. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance if he will estimate the yield from a 20% income levy applied to all earned income excluding social welfare; and the additional revenue from applying a 40% income levy on income above €80,000. [36590/09]

148. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance his estimate of the yield from a 3% income levy applied to all personal income including social welfare with no threshold or ceiling; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36591/09]

Minister for Finance (Deputy Brian Lenihan): I propose to take Questions Nos. 147 and 148 together.

[181]I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the estimated full year yield to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2010 incomes, from applying a 20% income levy to all earned income, excluding social welfare income, is estimated to be of the order of €14 billion. On the same basis, the additional full year yield from applying a 40% income levy on income above €80,000 (i.e. an extra 20% on income above €80,000) would be approximately €1.6 billion. The full year yield, estimated by reference to 2010 incomes, from a 3% income levy applied to all personal income, excluding social welfare income and with no threshold or ceiling, is estimated to be of the order of €2.3billion.

Payments from the Department of Social and Family Affairs comprise means-tested payments and non-means tested payments. In accordance with the 2009 estimates, the total cost of these payments in 2009 would be in the region of €20 billion and 3% of this figure is €600 million. Apart from those related to Social Welfare payments, the figures are estimates from the Revenue tax-forecasting model using actual data for the year 2007 adjusted as necessary for income and employment trends for the year 2010. They are therefore provisional and likely to be revised.

149. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children the funding which is available to assist a person (details supplied) in County Longford to meet the cost of the continued running of a Montessori school; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36470/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children (Deputy Barry Andrews): As the Deputy will be aware, I have responsibility for the implementation of the National Childcare Investment Programme 2006-2010 (NCIP) as well as the new free Pre-School year of Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) scheme, which is being introduced from January next. The NCIP provides capital grant funding for the development and refurbishment of childcare services as well as support funding for community based childcare services, under the Community Childcare Subvention Scheme (CCSS), to enable them to charge reduced childcare fees to disadvantaged and low income working parents. Capital expenditure over the course of the NCIP is expected to amount to approximately €190 million and create over 25,000 additional childcare places. I regret to advise the Deputy that, due to the economic turndown, the capital programme closed to new applicants in April of this year.

The new ECCE scheme will allow qualifying children to avail of a free pre-school place in the year before they commence primary school. In January 2010, the scheme is open to private and community based pre-school services which are notified to the Health Service Executive (HSE) or registered with the Irish Montessori Educational Board (IMEB). Services which choose to participate in the scheme, will receive grant funding from my Office based on a capitation fee of €2,450 per annum for each qualifying child. In return, the service will be required to provide appropriate programme based activities as part of the free pre-school year. Full details of the scheme, including the terms and conditions which will apply, are available on my Office’s website at www.omcya.ie.

Following the announcement of the scheme in April of this year, my Office wrote to pre-school services operating in the State, inviting them to apply in respect of the period January to August 2010. Where a service did not apply to enter the scheme in January 2010, but wishes to do so from September 2010, it will have an opportunity to apply in early 2010.

150. Deputy Phil Hogan asked the Minister for Health and Children her plans to provide an [182]additional dermatologist for the south-east region, as was recommended in November 2003 by Comhairle na nOspidéal; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36367/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): One of the guiding principles of the Comhairle na nOspidéal’s report of the Committee on Dermatology Services is that services should be equitable and patient centred with a strong emphasis on regional self-sufficiency and collaboration between primary and secondary care. This is in line with the Government commitment to ensuring quality health services, delivered efficiently and effectively. Ensuring patient safety is paramount, so that people can have confidence in the services and that the best possible patient outcomes are achieved.

The HSE recognises that dermatology services in the HSE South East require further development. At present there is one consultant dermatologist working in the South East region. The dermatology service includes in-patient care where required; day cases and out-patient consultations. Out-reach clinics are provided in Wexford, Kilkenny and Clonmel. In Waterford Regional Hospital, the dermatology services include a range of facilities including out-patient clinics, cryotherapy, minor surgery and nurse-led phototherapy services. The HSE has identified the provision of a second consultant dermatology post among its priorities for development. This year I allocated funding to the HSE for demographic service pressures, and the HSE decided to prioritise posts in vascular surgery and orthopaedics in the South East. I am pleased to say that these posts were approved and are now being progressed.

The HSE is faced with difficult choices in delivering its services within the resources available. It will continue to keep the scope for further developments in dermatology services under consideration bearing in mind the funds it has available. In line with the National Service Plan 2009 and its Transformation Programme, the HSE will be reviewing the current configuration of all hospitals in the South Eastern Hospital Group.

151. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Health and Children the costs incurred by her constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at her Department in respect of leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36383/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): During the years 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 no costs have been incurred for leaflet design, production,delivery or otherwise in respect of my constituency office or the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at my Department.

152. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Health and Children the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at her Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36397/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): The information requested is being collated in my Department and will be forwarded directly to the Deputy as soon as possible.

153. Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will ensure [183]that the consultation appointment for a person (details supplied) in County Cork will not be changed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36404/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): As this is a service matter, it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

154. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Health and Children if applications submitted for the fair deal nursing home support scheme will be backdated to 27 October 2009 if they are eligible. [36413/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Health and Children (Deputy Áine Brady): The legislation provides that anyone in an approved private nursing home immediately prior to the 27th October who applies for and receives State support under the Nursing Homes Support Scheme will have their support backdated to that date (27th October).

155. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Health and Children if she has guidelines governing the fitness of a person to sign a consent which avoids a court procedure under the fair deal scheme. [36414/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Health and Children (Deputy Áine Brady): I understand the Deputy’s question to refer to a person’s capacity to apply for the Nursing Homes Support Scheme. It is a well established common law principle that individuals must be presumed to have capacity until the contrary is proven. The new Nursing Homes Support Scheme Act 2009 provides, for the first time, for an explicit statutory statement of this common law presumption. In so doing, the Act is in keeping with the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission’s Report on Vulnerable Adults and the Law: it seeks to respect the dignity and autonomy of applicants to the maximum extent possible while also promoting legal certainty in relation to the common law principle of the presumption of capacity.

This principle of the presumption of capacity forms the basis for dealing with all applications under the scheme. It also constitutes the starting point for assessing capacity under section 21 of the Act in the context of applications for the appointment of care representatives. Finally, under the Act, the administration of the scheme, and preparation of any guidelines in respect of its administration, is the responsibility of the HSE. Guidelines may be prepared by the HSE and must be approved by the Minister for Health and Children.

156. Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Health and Children the status of an application for optical benefit in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Cork; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36436/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): As the Deputy’s question relates to a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

157. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Health and Children the meat suppliers in the Health Service Executive west; the duration and value of their contracts; the meat products involved; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36452/09]

[184]Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children (Deputy Trevor Sargent): The information requested is being provided by the Health Service Executive and will be forwarded to the Deputy directly.

158. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Health and Children, further to Parliamentary Question No. 487 of 16 September 2009, when repayments will be made in the western region; the timetable for the completion of this process and the reclaim procedure for the next of kin; the individuals dealing with the cases in each Health Service Executive region; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36453/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): The first payments of interest retained on invested Patient Private Property funds by the HSE have now been made to clients. The task of calculating and processing retained interest payments will re-commence during November 2009, when payments for the remainder of HSE South will commence. Payments to clients resident in the western region will commence most probably in early 2010.

The HSE will where possible make payments of retained interest to the Patients’ Private Property accounts of clients. If such accounts are not currently being operated, the HSE will seek to identify the present whereabouts of these clients, or their representatives, so that these funds may be transferred directly. The task of distributing retained interest will be managed by the PPPA Central Unit in Tullamore, Co. Offaly in co-operation with relevant staff at each local Care Centre, where relevant client records are retained.

159. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children the position regarding an appointment for orthodontic treatment in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Longford; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36472/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

160. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children the course of action a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath should take; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36474/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

161. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Health and Children her views on the common pool for recruitment to promotional positions in the Health Service Executive among others; if she will provide more promotional positions to open competition; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36477/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

162. Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Health and Children if the Health Service Executive has received written confirmation that all statutory requirements relating to [185]fire safety and building control have been complied with in homes for children within the care system; the details of homes which have not provided this confirmation; the number of children who have been admitted to these homes since the date the HSE requested confirmation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36514/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children (Deputy Barry Andrews): As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

163. Deputy Paul Kehoe asked the Minister for Health and Children the plans for swine influenza vaccination of persons over 65 years of age; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36527/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): The Health Service Executive is finalising its plans to offer everyone in the state pandemic vaccine. The vaccine is arriving in small quantities initially and total delivery will be spread over a 12 month period and therefore we need an ordered sequence of giving the vaccine to the people most in need first. The National Immunisation Advisory Committee and the Pandemic Influenza Advisory Committee have advised on the priority groups for vaccination based on the epidemiology of the disease and the availability of vaccine. The advice is that the vaccine should be given to the population in the following order:

Those with chronic illness aged between 6 months and 65 years and all pregnant women of more than 14 weeks gestation

Health Care Workers (HCWs)

Children between 6 months and 18 years

Adults >65 years

The rest of the population.

It is envisaged that Mass Vaccination Teams comprising of doctors, nurses and administration staff will vaccinate the over 65s in specially created clinics.

164. Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) will receive payment on a health repayment scheme claim in view of the fact that the acceptance form was returned to the Health Service Executive on 16 June 2009: the position regarding this case; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36549/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

165. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Health and Children the cost of official domestic travel, including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by herself and the Ministers of State at her Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36567/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): The information requested is being collated in my Department and will be forwarded directly to the Deputy as soon as possible.

166. Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Health and Children if the 270 social work posts called for in the recent Ryan report are excluded from the current Health Service Executive recruitment moratorium; if these 270 positions will be filled by hiring new social workers or if existing staff will be redeployed into these positions; when a new recruitment panel for social workers in the HSE will be created; when these 270 posts will begin to be filled; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36593/09]

Minister for Health and Children (Deputy Mary Harney): As part of the overall approved employment control ceiling for 2009, my Department has provided written confirmation to the HSE that the general moratorium on recruitment, promotion and the payment of acting up allowances does not apply to specific designated grades, including social worker grades. This moratorium exemption provides for vacancies in existing posts in these grades to continue to be filled. Newsocial workers posts may also be created, up to a specified limit of 270, provided that the HSE is satisfied in each case that there is no scope to redeploy an equivalent post from the hospital sector to the primary and community care sector. This moratorium exemption provides for an increase in the number of such posts, in line with Government policy, in order to meet the requirements of integrated care delivery and primary care needs particularly in respect of children at risk, the elderly and those with disabilities. The recruitment and retention of these key front line posts, including social workers, is vital to ensure continued progress in the development of community settings.

Subject to overall parameters set by Government, the Health Service Executive has the responsibility for determining the composition of its staffing complement. In that regard, it is a matter for the Executive to manage and deploy its human resources to best meet the requirements of its Annual Service Plan for the delivery of health and personal social services to the public. With regard to a national recruitment campaign for the appointment of social workers, as this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

167. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children when a placement will be arranged for a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36611/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Health and Children (Deputy Áine Brady): As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

168. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of domiciliary care allowance applications received in each of the past five years to date; the number granted, refused or pending; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36618/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children (Deputy John Moloney): Since 1st April 2009 new applicants for Domiciliary Care Allowance apply to the Department of Social and Family Affairs. Prior to this date application was made to the Health Service Executive. Therefore I have arranged for the Deputy’s question to be referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

169. Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will respond to correspondence (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36826/09]

[187]Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children (Deputy John Moloney): The National Disability Strategy is a priority for this Government. This is evidenced by the commitments in the renewed Programme for Government to prioritise the interests of people with a disability and advance the National Disability Strategy.

The Government has demonstrated its commitment to people with disabilities by providing additional funding of €10 million in 2009 for the provision of 125 additional therapy posts (speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and social workers) in disability and mental health services targeted at children with disabilities of school-going age. These posts have now been allocated to priority areas of need identified by the Health Service Executive, in particular to address gaps in existing services for children with disabilities. A recruitment process is well underway and the majority of these posts will be filled this month with the remainder to be filled in December.

As part of the Government’s Value for Money and Policy Reviews for 2009-2011, a Review of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Disability Services in Ireland is being undertaken. This in-depth review of Disability Services will assess how well current services for people with disabilities meet their objectives and support the future planning and development of services. The evaluation will focus on the current provision of disability services and explore the way forward for the development of services within a value for money and policy framework. The objectives of the Review are to

Examine disability services in Ireland funded by the HSE, including the statutory and non-statutory sectors.

Deliver a comprehensive analysis of data in relation to services and service providers.

Review current policy objectives and provide policy objectives for future service provision

I expect the review to develop proposals to achieve optimal effectiveness and efficiency with the existing substantial resources expended on health and personal services for people with a disability. A structured consultation process with both service users and service providers will be an integral part of the Review. I met with Inclusion Ireland yesterday following their press conference and encouraged them to start formulating their views and documenting any examples of best practice, efficiencies and effectiveness which should be brought to the attention of the review project team.

170. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Transport the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36386/09]

Minister for Transport (Deputy Noel Dempsey): No such costs have been incurred by the Department of Transport.

171. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Transport the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36400/09]

[188]Minister for Transport (Deputy Noel Dempsey): The information sought by the Deputy is being compiled and will be provided to him as soon as possible.

172. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Transport if a matter (details supplied) will be supported. [36451/09]

Minister for Transport (Deputy Noel Dempsey): I refer the Deputy to the answer given yesterday to Dáil Questions Nos. 201 and 202. The position remains unchanged.

173. Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Transport if has had discussions with Aer Lingus or Aer Lingus board members appointed by the Government regarding the recent job cuts announcements by Aer Lingus; if he was advised in advance of its proposals; if he expressed a view on such proposals either before or after the company announcement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36535/09]

Minister for Transport (Deputy Noel Dempsey): The cost-restructuring plan recently announced by Aer Lingus Group plc is entirely a matter for the Board and management of the company. I was not advised by the company of the details of the plan in advance of the announcement to the Stock Exchange. A representative of the company briefed officials from my Department on the details of the plan on 7th October following the company’s announcement to the Stock Exchange.

In an introductory meeting with the new CEO of the company on 17th September, the CEO indicated to me that the company expected to announce its cost-restructuring plan in October and that very hard decisions would have to be taken if the company was to survive in the long term. I outlined clearly to the CEO Government Aviation Policy on connectivity & competitiveness, Regional and Development policy. I would encourage Aer Lingus management and employees to engage constructively in the consultation process, which the company has now commenced, to get the airline through this difficult period and emerge stronger in the future.

174. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Transport the position with respect to the use of the Dublin Port tunnel by the 41X Dublin Bus service; the applications currently under consideration by him in this respect; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36541/09]

Minister for Transport (Deputy Noel Dempsey): The initiation or alteration of a bus service by Dublin Bus is subject to compliance with a requirement to give advance notice to my Department and to compliance with the provisions of Section 25 of the Transport Act 1958 concerning competition with licensed private operators. Where proposed services by the Company are deemed to be in competition with services that are the subject of a licence held by a private bus operator issued under the Road Transport Act, 1932, Dublin Bus is required to obtain my consent under section 25 of the Transport Act 1958 before the Company can introduce such services. On 12th June 2008, approval was granted by my Department to Dublin Bus to operate its morning 41X services from Swords to Belfield via the Port Tunnel.

Dublin Bus notified my Department on 8th July 2008 of its proposal to operate the existing 41X services from the City Centre to Swords in the evening via the Port Tunnel. A decision on this proposal has been deferred until such time as prior applications in relation to this route are finalised. Applications are dealt with on a first come first served basis and Dublin Bus is aware of these procedures generally and have been advised of the position in respect of this particular application. Details of applications are treated as confidential until they are finalised.

[189]

175. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Transport the position with respect to the re-location of the 37 bus terminus to the Blanchardstown Town Centre or elsewhere; the applications currently under consideration by him in this respect; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36542/09]

My Department received a proposal from Dublin Bus on 1st May, 2008 to alter the terminus of Route 37. It was deemed that this proposal would give rise to competition with an existing licensed service and accordingly, Dublin Bus were advised on 9th June, 2008 that an application in accordance with Section 25 of the Transport Act, 1958 was required. Dublin Bus subsequently submitted a revised proposal for this route. This was considered by my Department and again it was determined that this amended proposal would also give rise to competition with an existing licensed service. The Company were again advised that an application in accordance with Section 25 of the Transport Act, 1958 was required should the Company wish to pursue the introduction of this revised service.

A revised proposal regarding this route was received from Dublin Bus on 3rd April 2009 and this alteration was approved by my Department on the same date. The Company submitted a further notification regarding this route on 12th August 2009, which is currently under consideration in my Department.

176. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Transport the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36570/09]

Minister for Transport (Deputy Noel Dempsey): The information sought by the Deputy is being compiled and will be provided to him as soon as possible.

177. Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of offices and civil servants involved in the administration of the penalty points system; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36365/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): The Garda Síochána Fixed Charge Processing Office, located in Thurles, Co. Tipperary, is responsible for the administration of the Fixed Charge Processing System, which was developed by An Garda Síochána to enable computer aided processing of offences contrary to the Road Traffic Acts which incur fixed charges. I am informed by the Garda authorities that the number of civil servants involved in the administration of the Fixed Charge Processing Office, as at 30 September, 2009, is 62.8 whole-time equivalents. The administration of penalty points is a matter for the Department of Transport.

178. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36384/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): In the period in question no costs have been incurred by my Department associated with the design, production, delivery or otherwise of constituency related leaflets.

179. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36398/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): I refer the Deputy to my response to Parliamentary Question No. 132 of 8 October 2009. The position is as stated in that reply.

180. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, further to Parliamentary Question No. 637 of 6 October 2009, if this matter will be re-examined; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36440/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): I am advised by the Irish Prison Service that, having conducted a further examination of this case, it was found that a request for the release of the medical file of the person referred to by the Deputy was forwarded in error by his General Practitioner to Portlaoise Prison and not the Midlands Prison where he had been incarcerated. The request has now been redirected to the Midlands Prison and a copy of the prisoner’s medical records will be issued by registered post to his General Practitioner this week.

181. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will support the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 5. [36444/09]

182. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will support the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 5. [36445/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): I propose to take Questions Nos. 181 and 182 together.

I have been informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) that a letter regarding the status of the first named person referred to by the Deputy issued on 9 October, 2009 as requested by her on 7 October 2009. I have also been informed by the INIS that an application was received from the second named person on 8 October 2009 regarding changing their current status in the State. This application is currently under consideration and a decision will issue shortly. The INIS further informs me that a valid application for a certificate of naturalisation from the second named person referred to in the Deputy’s Question was received in the Citizenship Division of my Department in April 2009.

[191]All valid applications are dealt with in chronological order as this is deemed to be the fairest to all applicants. The average processing time from application to decision is now at 24 months. More complicated cases can at times take more than the current average, while an element of straight forward cases can be dealt with in less than that timescale.

183. Deputy Charlie O’Connor asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will confirm that adequate resources are available to gardaí at Tallaght Garda Station, Dublin, to allow them continue to support the endeavours of a forum (details supplied) to ensure that bus services in Tallaght are not threatened and curtailed by incidents of crime and anti-social behaviour, particularly in the lead up to Halloween; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36446/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): I am informed by the Garda authorities that local Garda management will continue to participate in the group referred to by the Deputy. The Forum is considered to be successful by stakeholders, and its members, including An Garda Síochána, work to address immediately any difficulties identified. I am further informed that policing plans are being prepared to deal with any anti-social behaviour that may occur during the Halloween period.

184. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if a matter (details supplied) will be supported. [36450/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): I am informed by the Garda authorities that the location referred to is in the Clontarf Garda Sub-District. Local Garda management is aware of difficulties being experienced by residents in the area as a result of anti-social behaviour and several persons have been arrested as a result of such behaviour. A member of the local Community Policing Unit is allocated specifically to this area and liaises with the local community. An active Neighbourhood Watch Scheme is in place and holds regular meetings. These are attended by the community Garda and issues raised are attended to.

The area is subject to regular patrols by uniform and plain clothes personnel, including the Community Policing Unit, supplemented by the Garda Mountain Bike Unit and the District Detective and Drug Units, the Divisional Crime Task Force and Traffic Corps personnel. Persons and vehicles are regularly stopped and searched in the area. Local Garda management closely monitors such patrols and other operational strategies in place, in conjunction with crime trends and policing needs of the communities, to ensure optimum use is made of Garda resources and the best possible Garda service is provided to the public. The situation will be kept under review, with paramount consideration being given to the needs of residents.

Incidents of public disorder and anti-social behaviour reported to the Garda authorities are the subject of investigation and dealt with appropriately, including by juvenile or adult caution, fixed charge notices or initiating criminal proceedings. Any persons found engaging in such behaviour will continue to be dealt with appropriately in accordance with the law. Current policing plans in the area are designed to address issues of crime and public order offences, including the prevention of crimes of violence against persons and property and the maintenance of an environment conducive to the improvement of the quality of life of residents. This strategy is central to the delivery of the policing service to the area in question.

185. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when [192]he will enact the ban on upward only rent reviews into law; if he is reconsidering this matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36478/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): When Section 132 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 was brought forward in July, I made it clear that an appropriate period of time would be needed to allow the market to factor in the very significant changes which were being introduced. That remains the position. While I have taken no final decision on a commencement date, I would note that the section will not be commenced before 1 December at the earliest as that is the date which has been chosen for other sections in the Act.

186. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36568/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): The cost of domestic travel expenses paid directly to the Ministers and Ministers of State attached to this Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 is as follows:

	Cost
Mr. Dermot Ahern T.D.	€18 (2009 –€18)
Mr. Brian Lenihan T.D.	€406 (2008 –€406)
Mr. Michael McDowell T.D.	€Nil
Mr. Conor Lenihan T.D. (Minister of State)	€34,293 (2009 –€11,189, 2008 –€15,909 and 2007 –€7,195)
Mr. Frank Fahey T.D. (Minister of State)	€18,467 (2007 –€18,467)
Mr. Sean Power T.D. (Minister of State)	€37,880 (2008 –€24,134, 2007 –€13,746)

The payments to Ministers of State relate for the most part to mileage expenses incurred for official travel made using their own vehicle. The conditions and rates of mileage payments are set centrally by the Department of Finance.

187. Deputy Charles Flanagan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of offences in which a knife was involved to date in 2009; the number of murders in which a knife was involved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36597/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): In the time available it has not been possible for the Garda authorities to supply the details requested by the Deputy. I will be in contact with the Deputy when the information is to hand.

188. Deputy Charles Flanagan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of offences to date in 2009 committed by suspected offenders on bail, broken down by offence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36598/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): The Garda Síochána Act 2005 makes provision for the compilation and publication of crime statistics by the [193]Central Statistics Office, as the national statistical agency, and the CSO has established a dedicated unit for this purpose. I have requested the CSO to provide the statistics sought by the Deputy directly to him.

189. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if consideration on compassionate grounds will be given in respect of residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 8; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36622/09]

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Deputy Dermot Ahern): I refer the Deputy to Parliamentary Question No. 126 of Thursday, 26 February, 2009, and the written Reply to that Question. The person concerned, accompanied by her three minor children, applied for asylum on 11 October 2005. The three children were included on their mother’s asylum application. In accordance with Section 9 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended), the person concerned and her children were entitled to remain in the State until her application for asylum was decided. Her asylum application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Arising from the refusal of her asylum application, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was notified, by letter dated 26 January 2009, that the Minister proposed to make Deportation Orders in respect of her and her children. She was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of Deportation Orders or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why Deportation Orders should not be made against her and her children. In addition, she was notified of her entitlement to apply for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006).

The person concerned submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with these Regulations and this application is under consideration at present. When consideration of this application has been completed, the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome.

In the event that the application for Subsidiary Protection is refused, the position in the State of the person concerned, and that of her children, will then be decided by reference to the provisions of Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement. All representations submitted will be considered before the file is passed to me for decision. Once a decision has been made, this decision and the consequences of the decision will be conveyed in writing to the person concerned.

The Deputy might wish to note that following the initial refusal of the asylum application of the person concerned, she applied to be re-admitted to the asylum process in accordance with the provisions of Section 17(7) of the Refugee Act 1999 (as amended). This application was approved which gave rise to the fresh, and ultimately unsuccessful, consideration of her asylum claims. This is the primary reason for the delay in having her asylum claim finalised.

190. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for [194]leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36382/09]

Minister for Foreign Affairs (Deputy Micheál Martin): My Department has not provided any funding to my constituency office or the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at this Department for leaflet design, production, delivery or other related costs in 2007, 2008, or to date in 2009.

191. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36396/09]

Minister for Foreign Affairs (Deputy Micheál Martin): As the Deputy will appreciate, Ministers serving at my Department, by the nature of its responsibilities, are obliged to undertake a significant amount of official travel overseas. In regard to official travel overseas, I have included below, in tabular form, the total costs incurred on accommodation, commercial flights and travel subsistence for 2007, 2008 and 2009 (January — August) in regard to each Minister and Minister of State who has served in my Department in this period. In addition to these Ministerial costs, there may be other incidental costs incurred at the destination, by the delegation as a whole; such costs are not collated centrally.

My Department is fully compliant with the Department of Finance guidelines on foreign travel. My Department also operates its own detailed internal travel guidelines and practises which ensure cost effective travel practises, both in Headquarters and throughout our network of 75 diplomatic missions abroad. The central aim of the Departmental travel policy, which applies to both Ministers and officials, is to minimise official travel costs and to achieve value for money for expenditure necessarily incurred, consistent with the effective discharge of official duties.

Minister for Foreign Affairs — Travel Costs 2007-2009

	2007	2008	2009 (January – August)
	€	€	€
Airfares
Minister Ahern	8,092	18,738
Minister Martin		4,875	2,896
Accommodation
Minister Ahern	9,517	5,271
Minister Martin		8,010	4,358
Subsistence
Minister Ahern	4,975	1,942
Minister Martin		3,928	1,802
Total:	22,584	42,764	9,056

[195]Ministers of State — Travel Costs 2007-2009

	2007	2008	2009 (January – August)
	€	€	€
Airfares
MOS Conor Lenihan T.D.	2,340
MOS Michael Kitt T.D.	7,750	10,918
MOS Peter Power T.D.		26,260	19,020
MOS Dick Roche T.D.	17,087	19,669	8,101
MOS Noel Treacy T.D.	4,736
Accommodation
MOS Conor Lenihan T.D.	2,022
MOS Michael Kitt T.D.	276	1,913
MOS Peter Power T.D.		2,876	4,510
MOS Dick Roche T.D.	1,272	7,758	647
MOS Noel Treacy T.D.	736
Subsistence
MOS Conor Lenihan T.D.	903
MOS Michael Kitt T.D.	1,077	880
MOS Peter Power T.D.		3,714	3,001
MOS Dick Roche T.D.	1,499	6,145	1,709
MOS Noel Treacy T.D.	1,598
Total:	41,296	80,133	28,895

It should be noted that MoS Dick Roche is also a Minister of State at the Department of the Taoiseach and that other travel costs may be a charge on that Department.

It should also be noted that Ministers of State generally do not use the Government Jet and avail of scheduled flights in most instances.

192. Deputy Brendan Howlin asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the ongoing burden of international debt on poorer countries; the way he considers that this burden affects African countries in particular; if he will provide details of any policy initiatives currently being formulated by him for the purpose of addressing this issue at international level; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36406/09]

Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs (Deputy Peter Power): Ireland has played an important role internationally on the issue of alleviation of the debt burden on developing countries. The Government’s policy strategy, which was prepared jointly by the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Department of Finance, was published in 2002. It supports the total cancellation of the debts of the world’s poorest countries. A review of the strategy is now being undertaken by the two Departments and I expect it will be completed by the end of 2009.

Ireland’s bilateral assistance to the developing world is strongly focused on the poorest countries in sub-Saharan Africa, and has always been exclusively in the form of grants rather than loans. The Government has also provided significant resources for initiatives to ease or cancel [196]the debt burden on developing countries. The two main international instruments which have been established to address the issue are the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) and the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative. The MDRI came into effect on 1 July 2006, and provides for cancellation of eligible debt from the World Bank, the African Development bank and the International Monetary Fund for many of the world’s poorest and most indebted countries. To date, 25 countries have benefited from debt relief under the MDRI. Ireland’s share of the total cost of debt relief provided by the World Bank under the initiative is €58.64 million. The Government contributed this amount in full in 2006.

Ireland has also contributed over €20 million to the HIPC initiative, which is implemented by the World Bank and the IMF, with the objective of reducing the debt burden of qualifying countries to sustainable levels. Overall, some $70 billion in debt service relief has been approved under the HIPC initiative for 33 countries, 27 of which are in Africa.

I am concerned that progress achieved on the debt problem could be undermined by the impact of the economic crisis. Some of the Least Developed Countries, particularly in Africa, are now facing serious short term difficulties in financing basic services. The IMF estimated earlier this year that the 25 Least Developed Countries which have been most seriously affected by the economic crisis already face a $25 billion budgetary shortfall in 2009.

I welcome the work now underway in the World Bank to develop a Crisis Response Facility which would provide quick and effective assistance for the most vulnerable countries in the face of economic crisis. I also believe it is important to ensure that these international efforts, and the efforts of the developing countries themselves, are not undermined by further irresponsible lending or borrowing. The Government supports the development of an international consensus on responsible lending and borrowing procedures and I welcome the dialogue which the World Bank has opened with civil society groups on the complex issues involved.

Ireland will remain actively engaged on the debt issue internationally. In particularly, we want to ensure that the IMF and the World Bank continue to help low income countries meet their development financing needs without re- accumulating unsustainable levels of debt.

193. Deputy Charlie O’Connor asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the actions being taken to achieve the release of persons (details supplied); if his attention has been drawn to the interest of people here in this issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36553/09]

Minister for Foreign Affairs (Deputy Micheál Martin): I am extremely concerned for the welfare of Sharon Commins and her Ugandan colleague Ms.Hilda Kawuki, who have been in captivity for over 100 days now. Mr Al Gailani, the Sudanese Minister for Humanitarian Affairs, was appointed by the Sudanese Government as our official point of contact and has been in contact on almost a daily basis with our Ambassador to Sudan, Mr Gerry Corr, who remains with a strong interagency team in situ in Sudan. I am also in regular contact with Mr Al Gailani.

The Irish team in Sudan is continuing its work to secure the safe release of the two hostages. During my own visit to Sudan on the 6 and 7 September I impressed upon the Sudanese Government the need to persuade the kidnappers to free Sharon and Hilda and to bring this unacceptable situation to a swift and peaceful end. My visit was also useful in terms of emphasising that the release of the women is a priority at the highest political level for this Government, and in ensuring that the issue remains at the top of the Sudanese agenda, including at [197]Ministerial level. More recently, on the 23 September, during my visit to New York, I availed of the opportunity to meet with the Sudanese Government at a senior level and also asked for the assistance of the US Government to use whatever influence it can on the Khartoum authorities to secure the release of the two women.

I have been in ongoing contact with the Commins family and our Embassy in Kampala has kept the Kawuki family informed of developments. As the Deputy will appreciate, it would not be appropriate for me to go into the details of sensitive discussions which have taken place. I can, however, assure the Deputy that our efforts are continuing as intensely as ever.

194. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36566/09]

Minister for Foreign Affairs (Deputy Micheál Martin): In regard to official domestic travel, I have included below, in tabular form, the total costs incurred on such travel for 2007, 2008 and 2009 (January-August) in regard to each Minister and Minister of State who has served in my Department in this period.

My Department is fully compliant with the Department of Finance guidelines on travel. My Department also operates its own detailed internal travel guidelines and practices which ensure cost effective travel practices, both in Headquarters and throughout our network of 75 diplomatic missions abroad. The central aim of the Departmental travel policy, which applies to both Ministers and officials, is to minimise official travel costs and to achieve value for money for expenditure necessarily incurred, consistent with the effective discharge of official duties.

Minister for Foreign Affairs, Domestic Travel Costs 2007-2009

	2007	2008	2009 (January – August)
	€	€	€
Transport
Minister Ahern
Minister Martin
Total:
Accommodation
Minister Ahern
Minister Martin			120
Total:
Subsistence
Minister Ahern		18
Minister Martin
Total:

[198]Ministers of State, Domestic Travel Costs 2007-2009

	2007	2008	2009 (January– August)
	€	€	€
Motor Travel Allowance*
MOS Conor Lenihan T.D.	8,177
MOS Michael Kitt T.D.	13,322	17,697
MOS Peter Power T.D.		15,175	17,845
MOS Dick Roche T.D.	13,311	28,467	16,931
MOS Noel Treacy T.D.	36,462
Other Transport
MOS Conor Lenihan T.D.
MOS Michael Kitt T.D.
MOS Peter Power T.D.
MOS Dick Roche T.D.
MOS Noel Treacy T.D.
Accommodation
MOS Conor Lenihan T.D.
MOS Michael Kitt T.D.	82	266
MOS Peter Power T.D.		288	97
MOS Dick Roche T.D.
MOS Noel Treacy T.D.
Subsistence
MOS Conor Lenihan T.D.	219
MOS Michael Kitt T.D.	291
MOS Peter Power T.D.		627	145
MOS Dick Roche T.D.
MOS Noel Treacy T.D.

195. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will support a matter (details supplied). [36579/09]

Minister for Foreign Affairs (Deputy Micheál Martin): In reply to Priority Question No. 7 on 23 September 2009, Minister Roche on my behalf gave the Government’s initial views on the Goldstone Report and the findings it contains. As stated in that reply:

The exhaustive findings and recommendations made by Judge Goldstone and his colleagues deserve the most serious consideration by all those concerned with the defence of human rights. It is appropriate that the report should receive full and urgent consideration at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

That consideration began at the Human Rights Council on 29 September, and Ireland, although not a member of the Council, intervened in support of the seriousness and credibility of the Report, and the need to respond to and act upon it. The letter received by the Deputy, which I myself also received, criticised the postponement of consideration of a draft Resolution on [199]the Report to the next HRC session in March, and called instead for the matter to be returned to the HRC. A Special Session of the Human Rights Council has now been called to discuss the Goldstone Report, and this is taking place in Geneva today and tomorrow.

It is for the HRC, which commissioned the Report, to consider in the first instance how to take it forward. In view of the length and detail of the Report, and the wide-ranging nature of its recommendations, this process will undoubtedly continue beyond the Special Session, and indeed could well involve other international fora as well, in the event of the very serious allegations documented not being properly and independently investigated by Israel and the authorities in Gaza.

196. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36374/09]

Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism (Deputy Martin Cullen): There were no costs incurred by the Department for leaflet design, production, delivery or other related costs for either my constituency office, since becoming Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism in May 2008, or that of Minister of State Mansergh, since becoming Minister of State at the Department in May 2008.

197. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 [36388/09]

Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism (Deputy Martin Cullen): The total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by myself since becoming Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism in May 2008, by my predecessors and former Ministers, the late Mr. Seamus Brennan, TD and Mr. John O’Donoghue TD, and by the Minister of State in my Department Mr. Martin Mansergh TD in 2007, 2008 and 2009 is €75,683.09.

198. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36558/09]

Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism (Deputy Martin Cullen): Since becoming Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism in May 2008, the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by myself and the Minister of State in my Department is €1,661.87.

199. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36376/09]

[200]Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs (Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív): My Department did not incur any costs in relation to leaflet design, production, delivery or other related costs in 2007, 2008 or to date in 2009, either in my own constituency office or the constituency office of the Minister of State at my Department. While a small number of handouts have been prepared, when required, by the constituency offices, these were prepared and copied in-house and therefore incurred no design, production or delivery costs.

200. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 [36390/09]

Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs (Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív): The relevant expenditure, all of which was incurred in the course of carrying out necessary official business on behalf of my Department, is set out in the tables below.

Table 1: Official Foreign Travel — Minister

Year	Total Cost
	€
2007	24,693
2008	41,739
2009 to date	13,796

Table 2: Official Foreign Travel — Ministers of State

Year	Total Cost
	€
2007	8,566
2008	4,090
2009 to date	910

201. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36560/09]

Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs (Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív): The relevant expenditure, which was incurred in the course of carrying out necessary official business on behalf of my Department, is set out in the tables below.

Table 1: Official Domestic Travel — Minister

Year	Total Cost
	€
2007	1,246
2008	2,588
2009 to date	704

Table 2: Official Domestic Travel — Ministers of State*

Year	Total Cost
	€
2007	9,179
2008	22,708
2009 to date	9,850

202. Deputy Billy Timmins asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position in relation to rent allowance; the limits for a couple in receipt of social welfare with no children; the amount they can be allocated; the amount for a single person with no children in receipt of social welfare; the criteria for a single person to rent accommodation and for the Health Service Executive to pay the rent; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36418/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The purpose of the rent supplement scheme is to provide short-term support to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source. Payment of rent supplement is normally calculated to ensure that a person, after the payment of rent, has an income equal to the rate of supplementary welfare allowance appropriate to their family circumstances, less a minimum weekly contribution of €24, which recipients are required to pay from their own resources. Many recipients pay more than €24 because they are also required, subject to income disregards, to contribute any additional assessable means that they have, over and above the appropriate rate of supplementary welfare allowance, towards their accommodation costs.

Rent supplement is also subject to a limit on the amount of rent that an applicant may incur. Rent limits are set at levels that enable different types of eligible households to secure and retain basic suitable rented accommodation, having regard to different rental market conditions that prevail in various parts of the State. The objective is to ensure that rent supplement is not paid in respect of overly expensive accommodation having regard to the size of the household.

The maximum rent which a person may incur and still qualify for rent supplement is prescribed in regulations. These regulations are time limited so that they can be adjusted in the light of rent levels generally and the wider economic climate. The most recent regulations cover the period to 31 May 2010. A copy of the current rent limits for all counties and household categories, including couples with no children and single people with no children, is appended.

In order to qualify for rent supplement, a person must be habitually resident in the State, be a bona fide tenant, satisfy a means test and be able to demonstrate that they are eligible for and in need of social housing. The qualifying criteria are the same for couples and single people with or without children. More detail is available on the Department’s website: http://www.welfare.ie/EN/Schemes/SupplementaryWelfareAllowance/Pages/RentSupplement. aspx

[202]Maximum Rent Levels from 1 June 2009

	Single person in shared accommodation	Couple in shared accommodation	Single person	Couple with no children	Couple with 1 child or one-parent family with 1 child	Couple with 2 children or one-parent family with 2 children	Couple with 3 children or one-parent family with 3 children
(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)
	€	€	€	€	€	€	€
Dublin	92	92	122	186	930	1,110	1,110
Wicklow	92	92	122	177	880	1,110	1,110
Kildare	92	92	112	166	880	1,110	1,110
Longford	66	66	94	112	131	144	158
Westmeath	66	66	94	112	131	149	163
Offaly	66	66	94	112	131	149	163
Laois	66	66	94	112	131	149	163
Limerick	66	66	103	122	140	158	172
Tipperary Nth.	66	66	94	122	140	158	172
Tipperary Sth.	76	76	108	122	140	158	158
Clare	66	66	94	122	140	158	172
Louth	66	66	108	122	149	158	186
Monaghan	66	66	85	113	131	140	172
Cavan	66	66	85	113	131	140	172
Meath	66	66	108	131	163	177	186
Donegal	66	66	85	112	131	138	158
Leitrim	66	66	85	112	131	138	153
Sligo	66	66	94	112	140	158	158
Wexford	76	76	108	122	140	158	158
Waterford	76	76	108	122	140	158	158
Carlow	76	76	108	122	140	158	158
Kilkenny	76	76	108	122	140	158	158
Kerry	71	71	94	143	143	171	183
Cork	71	71	108	143	163	177	189
Mayo	66	66	108	108	163	180	180
Galway	66	66	108	131	163	186	186
Roscommon	66	66	108	108	163	180	180

[203]The values refer to weekly values except for the values in Column 6, Column 7 and Column 8 for Dublin Kildare and Wicklow which are monthly values.

203. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason the carer’s strategy has not yet been published; when she will do so; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36476/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The Government is acutely aware and appreciative of the contribution made by carers to people needing ongoing care and support. In recognition of this, considerable improvements have been made in recent years in services and supports for carers. Over the past decade, weekly payment rates to carers have greatly increased, qualifying conditions for carer’s allowance have significantly eased, coverage of the scheme has been extended and new schemes such as carer’s benefit, half-rate carer’s allowance and the respite care grant have been introduced and extended.

In Budget 2009, the rate of carer’s allowance for those aged 66 or over increased by €7 to €239 per week and for those aged under 66 by €6.50 to €220.50 per week. These increases took effect from January 2009. Recipients of carer’s allowance are also eligible for household benefits and free travel and the respite care grant. It is estimated that the combined expenditure on carer’s allowance, carer’s benefit, the respite care grant and half-rate carer’s allowance will be €650 million in 2009.

In addition, my colleague the Minister for Health and Children has over recent years, provided significant additional investment either to put in place, or expand, a range of community based services such as Home Helps, Home Care Packages, Day/Respite Care, and Meals-on-Wheels. All of these are designed to support recipients and their families, so that those requiring care can remain in their own homes and communities for as long as possible.

During 2008 an interdepartmental group, chaired by the Department of the Taoiseach, with secretariat support provided by my Department, undertook work, including a public consultation process to develop a National Carers’ Strategy. However, because of the prevailing economic situation, it was not possible to set targets or time lines which could be achieved. In that context, rather than publishing a document which did not include any significant plans for the future, the Government decided not to publish a strategy. This position remains unchanged. The work carried out by the interdepartmental group and the submissions made to it have been useful and will, of course, contribute to the development of carers policy in the future.

204. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the costs incurred by her constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at her Department in respect of leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36385/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): All such costs were incurred through the one-stop-shop at the Houses of the Oireachtas and were vouched and verified.

205. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental [204]costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at her Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36399/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The total costs of foreign travel incurred by my predecessors and me for 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 are set out in the following table:

Year	Location	Purpose of trip	Costs
			€
Mary Hanafin
2009	Boston	Represent Irish Government at Funeral of Eunice Kennedy Shriver.	1,052
	Jonkoping, Sweden	EU meeting.	990
	Vienna	Conference for Ministers of Family Affairs.	746
	Stockholm	OECD Conference on Disability and Employment	1,110
	Philadelphia & Atlanta	St. Patrick’s Day 2009.*	8,633
	Brussels	Meeting of Ministers for Employment and Social Affairs.	202
	Prague	Parental Childcare & Employment Policy meeting.	379

2008	Paris	Meeting of Ministers as part of French Presidency	941
	Romania	Accompanying the President during official Presidential visit.	55
	Brussels	Ministerial Council meeting for Employment, Social Policy and Health ministers.	180
Martin Cullen	Miami & Atlanta	St. Patrick’s Day 2008.	17,564
Seamus Brennan
2007	Rome	St. Patrick’s Day 2007	2,545

The totals shown include the cost of flights paid directly to the relevant travel company and the cost of accommodation paid directly to hotels and the expenses which are incurred by our Embassies and reimbursed to them by the Department.

206. Deputy Phil Hogan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when an appeal in respect of child benefit will be concluded in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36402/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The Social Welfare Appeals Office has advised me that the relevant Departmental papers and comments of the Department have been received and the case has been referred to an Appeals Officer for consideration. The Social Welfare Appeals Office is an office of the Department that is independently responsible for determining appeals against decisions on social welfare entitlements.

[205]

207. Deputy Jimmy Deenihan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when a decision will be made on the appeal by a person (details supplied) in County Kerry for jobseeker’s allowance; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36411/09]

Question No. 208 withdrawn.

209. Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs her views regarding the financial difficulties experienced by people who were formerly self-employed and who have no entitlement to jobseeker’s benefit and due to the current economic climate cannot obtain employment; her plans to introduce a scheme of self-employed social insurance to address this issue; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36441/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The range of benefits and pensions to which different groups of workers may establish entitlement reflects the risks associated with the nature of their work. This in turn reflects the rate of contribution payable. Self-employed people including Artists are liable for PRSI at the Class S rate of 3% and are consequently eligible for a narrower range of benefits than general employees who, together with their employers, pay a total social insurance contribution of 14.05%, excluding levies, under the full-rate PRSI Class A.

Self-employed workers are not insured against short-term benefits such as illness and jobseeker’s payments — these are only available to people covered by PRSI Classes A, E, H and P. This reflects the need for coverage for various contingencies, the rate of contributions that self-employed people pay, the practicalities of administering and controlling access to short-term payments and the annualised system of contributions that these same people enjoy. A system of separate arrangements for employed and self-employed workers within a social insurance context is common in other European social protection systems.

There are no immediate plans to extend cover for short-term benefits to this group of insured workers. Any such measure would have significant financial implications and would have to be considered within a budgetary context. Consideration would also have to be given to an appropriate increase in the rate of the PRSI Class S contribution.

Self-employed workers who do not qualify for an insurance-based benefit may establish entitlement to assistance-based payments such as Jobseekers Allowance. They can apply for the means-tested Jobseeker’s Allowance if their business ceases or if they are on low income as a result of a downturn in demand for their services. In general their means will take account of the level of earnings in the last twelve months in determining their expected income for the following year. In the current climate account is taken of the downward trend in the economy. It is accepted that future earnings may be lower than those of previous years and this is factored in projecting future earnings, with account being taken of the potential for significant upward or downward variations in income from one year to the next.

210. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will [206]supply scanners to businesses (details supplied) to allow them access the swipe cards which recently issued to social welfare recipients in view of the fact that there is confusion with the old system at the present time between the businesses and the recipient; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36442/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The Department supports government policy which aims to facilitate the greater use of electronic payment systems in the economy in the interests of developing a world class payments environment in Ireland. Our payment strategy is designed to ensure that cost effective arrangements are in place for making payments to social welfare customers by using a range of payment options and to ensure that new payment facilities are made available to customers as they arise. Currently some 90% of customers receive their payment electronically direct to their post office or financial institution.

A range of measures were undertaken to inform customers of the change in payment methods and to address any concerns they may have regarding the use of the social services card to collect their payment at post offices. Each person is informed by personal letter of the change in their payment arrangement. A social services card, along with a covering letter explaining how to use the card, is also issued to them. Posters are displayed in all post offices, citizen’s information centres and throughout the Department’s local office network. An Post and the Irish Postmaster’s Union (IPU) are committed to assisting customers in the use of cards for collecting their payment

The Social Services Card is used as a key for accessing the An Post counter system and for identifying customers. Where the counter systems are not yet in place in non-automated post offices or PostBank offices, payment is made by way of a paper post draft. An Post are currently in the process of upgrading all post offices to facilitate electronic payment transfer. The upgrading of An Post counter systems, and the Post Office network, are a matter for the board of An Post which comes under the remit of the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. The PostPoint electronic transactions services infrastructure is a matter for Postbank Ireland Limited.

211. Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position regarding a jobseeker’s assistance appeal in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Galway; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36462/09]

212. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the estimated savings to the Exchequer if the qualifying year for the contributory State pension and State contributory transition pension were increased by one year respectively. [36466/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): It is estimated that €260 million could be saved if the qualifying year for the State Pension (Contributory) and State Pension (Transition) was increased by one year. However, it is important to note that these [207]estimated savings do not take account of additional expenditure that may be incurred through knock-on effects on other areas if people of these age groups qualified for unemployment or illness-related payments. The Government is currently finalising the National Pensions Framework which will be published before the end of the year. Any decisions on amending state pension age will be considered in that context.

213. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason a person (details supplied) in County Longford has been refused child benefit; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36471/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): In order to qualify for a range of Social Welfare payments, including Child Benefit, applicants are required to satisfy the Habitual Residence condition (HRC). This condition was introduced on 1st May 2004. The HRC requires the applicant to satisfy the Deciding Officer that they meet certain conditions, including that their centre of interest is in Ireland and that their future intentions, as demonstrated, are to remain in Ireland. The legal right to undertake employment and be self-supporting are considered by the Deciding Officer when the person’s centre of interest and future intentions are being examined. In order for Romanian nationals to be employed in Ireland, they are required to have a work permit. The person concerned does not have such a permit.

The Child Benefit application was refused on 18th May 2009 as the Deciding Officer, having considered all the circumstances, did not consider that the person concerned satisfied the HR condition as her centre of interest and future intentions have not been clearly established due to her inability to work legally in Ireland, or alternatively to support herself independently. The person concerned was notified of the decision in writing on 18th May 2009 and given the right of appeal.

214. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath has been refused a State transition pension; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36473/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): In order to qualify for a State Pension (Transition) at age 65, a person must have a yearly average of at least 24 reckonable social insurance contributions from their commencement of insurable employment up to the end of the tax year prior to their 65th birthday. The person concerned does not qualify for a State Pension (Transition) as she only has a yearly average of 2 reckonable contributions. PRSI contributions paid in respect of periods of self employment are not reckonable for State Pension (Transition). They are reckonable for State Pension (Contributory), which is payable from age 66.

215. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position of an appeal by a person (details supplied) in County Kildare against the decision to refuse their application for guardian’s payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36520/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The Social Welfare Appeals Office has advised me that the relevant Departmental papers and comments of the Department have been received and the case has been referred to an Appeals Officer for consideration. [208] The Social Welfare Appeals Office is an office of the Department that is independently responsible for determining appeals against decisions on Social Welfare entitlements.

216. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by herself and the Ministers of State at her Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36569/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The official domestic travel requirements of Ministers are met by using State cars with official Garda drivers, the costs of which are met from the Garda Síochána Vote. No other additional costs were incurred by me or by my predecessor in 2008 or in 2009 to date. The additional costs incurred in 2007 by the late Minister Brennan are set out in the following table:

Year	Type	Purpose of trip	Costs
			€
2007	Refreshments	Meeting in advance of opening of Carrick-on-Shannon and Sligo Offices	38.90
	Subsistence	Official Opening of Carrick-on-Shannon and Sligo offices	41.55
	Subsistence	Official Opening of refurbished Galway office	93.62

Since my appointment as Minister I have incurred no Travel and Subsistence costs for Domestic Travel.

217. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of married women claiming the contributory State pension for each year from 1990 to 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36581/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The Department of Social and Family Affairs does not maintain annual statistics on the marital status of people who are claiming State Pension (Contributory) or State Pension (Transition), as qualification is on an individual social insurance basis. However, the attached table shows the break-down between male and female SPT and SPC recipients from 1990 to date (Note, in 2007, provisions were made for individuals on SPT, on reaching the age of 66, to be automatically transferred to SPC, payable at the same rate).

Year	SPC — Male Recipients	SPC — Female Recipients	SPT — Male Recipients	SPT — Female Recipients
1990	47,804	26,666	37,715	10,760
1991	46,480	26,280	40,500	11,740
1992	46,323	26,388	42,458	12,727
1993	45,465	26,396	44,564	13,836
1994	44,622	26,198	47,326	14,885
1995	43,333	25,846	49,807	15,954
1996	42,413	25,575	52,576	17,164
1997	43,770	53,828	26,252	17,965
1998	44,969	26,737	56,212	19,104
1999	48,856	27,385	58,589	20,279
2000	55,650	30,567	57,699	20,671
2001	60,477	34,394	58,971	21,355
2002	66,382	38,913	60,899	22,156
2003	71,916	42,054	63,152	23,357
2004	74,961	43,692	65,536	24,334
2005	79,632	44,979	66,369	24,678
2006	88,786	50,938	66,378	24,708
2007	159,168	78,431	4,140	1,711
2008	166,869	83,248	5,015	2,227
2009*	174,241	88,000	5,804	2,667

218. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when rent allowance will be awarded to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36612/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The Health Service Executive has advised that according to its records, an application for mortgage interest supplement has not been received from the person concerned. It is open to the person concerned to contact his local community welfare officer with a view to making an application for mortgage interest supplement.

219. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of domiciliary care allowance applications received in each of the past five years to date; the number granted, refused or pending; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36617/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The transfer of the Domiciliary Care Allowance scheme from the Health Service Executive to this Department arose from a Government decision on 28th February 2006 to reallocate certain functions between Departments and Agencies as part of the health service reform programme.

The transfer of the scheme in 2009 took place in two stages:

From 1st April 2009, all new claims for Domiciliary Care Allowance have been decided by the Department.

From September 2009, the Department took over responsibility for the payment of all Domiciliary Care Allowance claims from the Health Service Executive.

The Deputy will appreciate, therefore, that this Department does not have the information sought in relation to the scheme before 1 April 2009.

In the period 1st April 2009 to 9th October 2009 a total of 2430 applications were received in the required format, of which 1688 cases have been fully processed by the Department. Of these applications, 633 were awarded while 1055 were deemed not to be eligible for Domiciliary Care Allowance. 742 applications are currently pending. Where a person is not satisfied with the decision of a Deciding Officer they may seek to have the decision reviewed or they may [210]appeal the decision to the Social Welfare Appeals Office. Information on applications prior to 1 April 2009 is a matter for the Minister for Health and Children.

220. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if mortgage support will be offered to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare. [36620/09]

221. Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will respond to correspondence (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36827/09]

Minister for Social and Family Affairs (Deputy Mary Hanafin): The issues raised in the correspondence referred to by the Deputy relate primarily to the provision of educational and other supports to young children with an intellectual disability and are, accordingly, matters which fall to be addressed by my colleagues, the Minister for Education and Science and the Minister for Health and Children. Insofar as issues of income support are concerned, I will be mindful of the issues raised in the correspondence, but the Deputy will understand that these issues will be considered in the context of the forthcoming Budget process and that it would not be appropriate for me to comment further at this stage.

222. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Defence the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36377/09]

Minister for Defence (Deputy Willie O’Dea): No such costs for leaflet design, production, delivery or other related costs have been borne on the Vote for my Department for the years 2007, 2008 or to date in 2009.

223. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Defence the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 [36391/09]

Minister for Defence (Deputy Willie O’Dea): The information requested by the Deputy in relation to the total cost of foreign travel is as follows:

Year	Minister	Minister of State
	€	€
2007	4,344.48	2,671.70
2008	3,570.33	NIL
2009 (to date)	523.00	NIL

[211]Both the Minister of State at my Department and I availed of the Ministerial Air Transport Service for foreign travel during the period in question. The amount of flying time involved was as follows:

Aircraft	Flying Time in Minutes
Gulfstream	4,260
Learjet	840

With regard to cost of travel, my Department follows the normal practice in the aviation business of costing aircraft by reference to the cost per flying hour under either of two headings:

(a) The direct cost, i.e. the costs which are additional to those associated with having the aircraft and which only arise when the aircraft is flown including maintenance, fuel and support services; and

(b) The total cost, i.e. the direct cost plus the costs associated with having the aircraft, i.e. depreciation and personnel costs.

The costs associated with Air Corps aircraft used in provision of Ministerial Air Transport Service are as follows:

Aircraft	Average Direct Cost Per Hour	Average Total Cost Per Hour
	€	€
Gulfstream	4,050	7,890
Learjet	1,270	2,950

224. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Defence the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36561/09]

Minister for Defence (Deputy Willie O’Dea): With the exception of use of the Ministerial Air Transport Service there were no costs incurred by me or by Ministers of State at my Department in 2007, 2008 or to date in 2009. I availed of the Ministerial Air Transport Service for domestic travel during the period in question. The amount of flying time involved was as follows:

Mode of Transport	Flying Time in Minutes
Helicopter EC135	570
Helicopter AW139	415

The Department of Defence follows the normal practice in the aviation business of costing aircraft by reference to the cost per flying hour under either of two headings:

The direct cost, i.e. the costs which are additional to those associated with having the aircraft and which only arise when the aircraft is flown including maintenance, fuel and support services; and

[212]The total cost, i.e. the direct cost plus the costs associated with having the aircraft, i.e. depreciation and personnel costs

The costs associated with Air Corps aircraft used in provision of Ministerial Air Transport Service are as follows:

Aircraft	Average Direct Cost Per Hour	Average Total Cost Per Hour
	€	€
Learjet	1,270	2,950
EC 135	430	1,590
AW 139	1,470	3,130

225. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36380/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): My Department has not provided any funding to my constituency office or the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at this Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009.

226. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009. [36394/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The total cost of foreign travel incurred by me and the Ministers of State at my Department during 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 is as follows:

Year	2007	2008	01 Jan – 13 Oct 2009
Total Expenses	€43,505.18	€55,474.01	€30,082.74

227. Deputy Billy Timmins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position regarding the new local government charge for second homes in the case of a person who has been left the family home in which a family member has the right to live for his or her lifetime, so the person cannot enter the house or rent it to anyone in view of the fact that the family member is living in it; if, in view of this the person will be exempt from the new €200 charge; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36454/09]

[213]Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The Government has decided to broaden the revenue base of local authorities by introducing a charge on all non-principal private residences. The charge, which is set at €200, is payable by the owners of private rented accommodation, holiday homes and any other residential property that is not the owner’s sole or main residence. While detailed guidance has been provided to local authorities for the purpose of applying the Local Government (Charges) Act 2009, covering, inter alia, the terms and definitions used in the Act and their broad application, interpretation and implementation of the legislation is a matter for the local authorities in the first instance.

228. Deputy Thomas Byrne asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the estimates for compliance with recent legislation requiring building energy rating certificates; the proposals he will introduce to increase the enforcement of this legislation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36459/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The EU Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings, which was transposed into Irish law by the European Communities (Energy Performance of Buildings) Regulations 2006 — 2008, introduced a requirement for a Building Energy Rating (BER) system. The Regulations clearly and unambiguously specify that any person who offers a building for sale or letting on or from 1 January 2009 or any agent acting on their behalf, is required to produce a copy of the BER certificate to any person expressing an interest in purchasing or taking a letting in the building. A person who contravenes these requirements commits an offence, unless the building in question is specifically exempted under Article 3 of the Regulations, and is liable, on prosecution by the Building Control Authority in whose functional area the building is situated, to a fine not exceeding €5,000. At present there are some 74,000 Building Energy Rating (BER) certificates in place in respect of dwellings and over 2,000 BER certificates in place for buildings other than dwellings.

In relation to improving compliance, Circular Letter BC 4/2009 — Enforcing Building Regulations Part L and Building Energy Ratings — issued to all Building Control Authorities on 17 February 2009. The Circular Letter, among other things, asked all local authorities to write to estate and letting agents within their functional area drawing their attention to the mandatory requirement for BER certificates in respect of buildings offered for sale or letting on or from 1 January 2009 and indicating that full compliance was expected from building owners and agents acting on behalf of owners.

With regard to continuing to improve compliance with and awareness of the BER system, my Department will continue to work closely with the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, SEI and the 37 local Building Control Authorities to promote awareness of the obligations which arise under the Regulations. SEI has already conducted a wide range of information and awareness campaigns and, later this Autumn, will engage in a further comprehensive advertising campaign to remind buyers of their rights and vendors of their obligations under the Regulations. In addition, the Renewed Programme for Government provides for the introduction of a mandatory requirement for the display of BER ratings where properties are advertised for sale or letting.

229. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when he will publish his review in relation to the three types of grants that cur[214]rently exist under the one scheme for older persons and people with disabilities; if he will provide a simplified application form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36475/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy Michael Finneran): Earlier this year, my Department commissioned the Centre for Housing Research to undertake an evaluation of the revised suite of Housing Adaptation Grants for Older People and People with a Disability, which were introduced on 1 November 2007. The evaluation aims to determine the effectiveness of the revised schemes in providing a more accessible framework of grant assistance to applicants, identify issues influencing the effectiveness of the schemes in meeting the housing needs of older people and people with a disability and to make recommendations for the future operation of these schemes within available resources. I expect to receive the evaluation report in late November and to publish it as soon as possible after considering its recommendations.

230. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the common pool for recruitment to promotional positions in local authorities amongst others; if he will provide more promotional positions to open competition; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36482/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The Common Recruitment Pool system, which has been in operation for more than 20 years, provides for the filling of posts at Grades V to VII in local authorities and other relevant agencies by competition confined to Local Authorities, Health Boards, Vocational Education Committees, Institutes of Technology and certain other health and local government agencies. Since 1 January 2007, arrangements are in place for 20% of posts at Grades V to VII to be filled by open competition.

A commitment under Towards 2016 to introduce a graduate entry level to local authorities is currently being progressed. Issues relating to the achievement of these commitments are currently being discussed with the relevant unions and staff interests. A significant Programme of Public Sector Reform is also now included in the Renewed Programme for Government including new initiatives in relation to hiring and promotion criteria, and increased open competition for senior Public Service appointments.

231. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if there is a statutory impediment that would prevent local authorities from informing councillors of scheduled pre-planning discussions before they take place and from allowing councillors from the relevant local area to attend these discussions either as observers or advocates for the public and community interest; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36491/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): Section 247 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 provides that a person who has an interest in land and who intends to make a planning application may, with the agreement of the planning authority concerned (which shall not be unreasonably withheld), enter into consultations with the planning authority in order to discuss any proposed development in relation to the land and the planning authority may give advice to that person regarding the proposed application. The section also provides that, in any such consultation, the planning [215]authority must advise the person concerned of the procedures involved and the requirements of the permission regulations, and must also indicate the relevant objectives of the development plan which may have a bearing on the decision of the planning authority.

A planning authority must also keep a record in writing of any consultations under this section that relate to a proposed development, including the names of those who participated in the consultations, and that a copy of such record shall be placed and kept with the documents to which any planning application in respect of the proposed development relates. Section 247 makes no reference to the matter of informing elected members about scheduled pre-application consultations or to the attendance of members at such consultations.

232. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the payment of bonuses to local authority officials; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36492/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): Following the recommendation of the Review Body on Higher Remuneration in the Public Sector (Part 2 of Report No.38 of 25 September 2000)a scheme of Performance Related Awards was introduced in the local authority sector for Managers, Assistant Managers and Directors of Services commencing with the calendar year 2003. The purpose of the scheme was to encourage and reward excellence within the sector. Under the scheme, participants prepare a statement of objectives at the beginning of the year and a self-assessment of performance at the end of the year. Objectives and assessments are subject to approval by the Committee for Performance Awards (CPA), who also make the final determination of the amounts on awards. The pool for performance awards was set at 10% of the pay bill for the group concerned and with individual participants eligible to receive payments of up to 20% of pay.

Details of awards made under the scheme are contained in the annual reports of the CPA which are available in the Oireachtas Library. Awards were defined in terms of their distribution as a percentage of pay, the range of monetary values, and the number of recipients. Awards were made each year from 2003 to 2007. No performance awards have been made in respect of 2008. The scheme for the Local Government Sector is currently suspended.

233. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of people who have been officially removed from local authority housing lists during each of the past five years for refusing accommodation offered by the local authority; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36515/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy Michael Finneran): Under Section 11 of the Housing Act 1988, as amended, the management of the housing waiting list and allocation of tenancies in local authority dwellings is a matter for the local authority concerned. The number of households on a local authority’s waiting list continuously fluctuates as households on the list are allocated housing, others moved from the list, and new households apply for housing support. My Department does not hold information in relation to the numbers currently on waiting lists in local authorities or the numbers of people who have been removed from the lists.

234. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local [216]Government his views on exempting public representatives from paying the fee to make an observation on a planning issue to the council and An Bord Pleanála; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36522/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The fee for making submissions or observations to a planning authority in respect of a planning application is €20. It was introduced in the Planning and Development Act 2000 and the Planning and Development Regulations 2001. Since the enactment of the 2000 Act, planning authorities are statutorily obliged to acknowledge submissions on planning applications and to consider those submissions before making decisions on planning applications. Persons who make submissions are also entitled to be notified of:

any new information provided;

the decision of the planning authority;

an appeal against the decision of the planning authority.

As stated in my Department’s Development Management Guidelines, a public representative does not have to pay the fee when making an enquiry with a planning authority as to the position regarding an application or when supporting or objecting to the application in general terms without elaborating on the grounds of the application or on a submission by an observer. However, where a public representative makes a formal submission, i.e. elaborates on the grounds of an application or a submission or raises a substantive new issue, the submission cannot be considered by the planning authority unless it is accompanied by the appropriate fee. I consider this reasonable in view of the requirements on the planning authority as set out above.

The fee for making submissions or observations to An Bord Pleanála in respect of a planning appeal is €50. However, it should be noted that where a person has already made a submission to the planning authority on the application, there is no need for him/her to make a further submission as the Board will consider the entire planning authority file, including all submissions or observations received. There are no proposals to amend these provisions at the present time.

235. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if an Irish citizen who is married to a citizen of another country, can apply to their local authority, in which area they were born, for the tenancy of a local authority house; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36530/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy Michael Finneran): The assessment and allocation of an individual household for social housing support is a matter for the local authority concerned. Under section 11 of the Housing Act 1988, I am precluded from being involved in a decision by a housing authority as to whether a particular household is eligible for support and indeed the allocation of that support. In relation to general guidance given by my Department to local authorities regarding eligibility for local authority housing, there is a general requirement that all members of an applicant’s household must have appropriate residency status, which entitles the individual members of that household to remain in the country. In the context of determining what [217]particular form of residency status is required, my Department is guided by the Department of Justice, Equality and Law reform.

236. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the guidelines to which families have to adhere under local authority legislation in relation to anti-social behaviour or actions (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36533/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy Michael Finneran): The tenancy agreement for dwellings let by housing authorities under the Housing Acts generally contains provisions in relation to anti-social behaviour. Under the Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2009 (“the 2009 Act”) there is a requirement that specific terms and conditions be set out in the tenancy agreement prohibiting anti-social behaviour in, or in the vicinity of, the dwelling by the tenant or a household member or any other person residing at or lawfully in the dwelling. Tenancy agreements in respect of leased properties also contain provisions relating to anti-social behaviour.

Under the Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1997, a local authority tenant, or the local authority itself in certain circumstances, may apply to the District Court for an excluding order against an individual member of the household who is believed to be engaging in anti-social behaviour. The 2009 Act provides for an amendment of the 1997 Act to broaden the definition of anti-social behaviour to include behaviour that causes alarm, impairs the use or enjoyment of a person’s home or results in damage to or defacement of property.

In line with the generality of tenancies of private rented accommodation, tenancies entered into under the Rental Accommodation Scheme [RAS] are subject to the Residential Tenancies Act 2004. This Act prohibits a tenant from engaging in anti-social behaviour in, or in the vicinity of, a dwelling to which the Act applies and allows a landlord to terminate any tenancy where the tenant is engaging in or allowing others to engage in such behaviour, subject to a notice period of only 7 days in the case of serious anti-social behaviour or 28 days in the case of less serious but persistent behaviour. The Residential Tenancies Act also provides that a third party affected by anti-social behaviour may, subject to certain conditions, take a case to the Private Residential Tenancies Board against a landlord who has failed to enforce tenant obligations. Under section 25(5) of the 2009 Act, a housing authority may notify a landlord where it becomes aware of anti-social behaviour by a RAS tenant in contravention of the 2004 Act and the landlord is thereupon required, if he or she has not already done so, to terminate the tenancy in accordance with the 2004 Act.

Housing authorities also have statutory powers to refuse to sell a house under tenant purchase and affordable arrangements to a person the authority has reason to believe is or has been engaged in anti-social behaviour or where a sale to that person would not be in the interest of good estate management. The 2009 Act makes provision to extend this to cover sales under the new schemes of incremental purchase and tenant purchase of apartments.

The Centre for Housing Research has also produced good practice guidelines on preventing and combating anti-social behaviour and has organised training courses for local authorities in this regard. Furthermore, I will commence shortly section 35 of the 2009 Act, which requires the elected members of each housing authority to adopt an anti-social behaviour strategy. This strategy must include procedures for making an anti-social behaviour complaint to a housing authority and details of initiatives for preventing and reducing anti-social behaviour in the housing authority’s own housing stock. Criminality associated with anti-social behaviour is addressed under the Criminal Justice Acts, responsibility for which rests with my colleague, the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

237. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the conclusions reached following a recent meeting (details supplied); the date and location of the meeting; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36545/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): Minister Finneran and I have had several discussions in regard to turf-cutting in designated raised bogs. We recently considered the issue of ensuring that the views of all parties, including those directly affected by any restrictions on turf cutting, are reflected in deliberations on the matter. This will be considered further by the Inter Departmental Working Group that I have established to advise me on the cessation of turf cutting in these sites.

238. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will furnish a reply to correspondence (details supplied); the reason for the three month delay in responding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36546/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The correspondence referred to in the question was acknowledged but a full response has not yet issued. Aspects of the correspondence are relevant to the work of the Inter-Departmental Working Group on the Cessation of Turf Cutting in Designated Areas and these have been referred to it for its consideration, along with other submissions received. The detailed technical and scientific issues raised in the correspondence do not fall within the terms of reference of the Inter-Departmental Group. My Department has examined these issues and I expect to be in a position to provide a response in the near future.

239. Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the fees charged by local authorities for each area in respect of Part V affordable housing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36548/09]

Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy Michael Finneran): The administration and processing of applications under the various affordable housing schemes is a matter for individual local authorities, and one in which my Department has no direct function. Accordingly, my Department does not have detailed information on the range of fees applied by individual authorities in providing access to prospective purchasers of affordable housing.

240. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36564/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The cost of official domestic travel incurred by me and the Ministers of State at my Department during 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009 is as follows:

Year	2007	2008	01 Jan – 13 Oct 2009
Cost	€79,245.59	€120,071.01	€49,412.07

241. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if it is expected to allocate the necessary funding to Kildare County Council to enable the Ballyna group water scheme to proceed in the coming year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36571/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): The Ballyna Regional Water Supply Scheme is included for funding in my Department’s Water Services Investment Programme 2007 — 2009, at an estimated cost of €11.5 million. My Department awaits the submission of Kildare County Council’s brief for the appointment of consultants to prepare a Preliminary Report for the scheme.

Local authorities were asked in July 2009 to submit an assessment of needs for water and sewerage services to my Department by the end of next week. These assessments will form a key input to the development of the 2010 to 2012 Water Services Investment Programme, which it is anticipated will be published in early 2010. In conducting their assessments, local authorities have been asked to prioritise schemes and contracts for progression over the coming years based on key environmental and economic criteria. The Department is awaiting the finalisation of this process in order to determine the priority to be attached to schemes, including Kildare County Council’s proposals for the Ballyna scheme.

242. Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when legislation regarding dog breeding establishments will be brought before Dáil Éireann; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36592/09]

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (Deputy John Gormley): Work is underway in drafting an amendment to the Control of Dogs Acts and I hope to publish my proposals in the near future. The draft Bill proposes to give statutory effect to the recommendations of the Working Group that had been established to review the management of dog breeding establishments. The Working Group recommended that a dog breeding establishment be defined as ‘a premises containing more than 5 female dogs, aged over 4 months, with breeding potential’. The draft Bill proposes that dog breeding establishments be required to register with the relevant local authority, that they pay a registration fee and that they meet a minimum set of veterinary, welfare and other standards, together with some associated requirements. I intend to publish the proposed legislation as soon as possible.

243. Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the local authorities who have put in place an energy efficiency plan to date in 2009; the action he will take with regard to local authorities who do not have a plan in place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36594/09]

Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (Deputy Eamon Ryan): The Government has set a target of achieving 20% energy efficiency savings across the economy in 2020. Recognising the opportunity for the public sector to fulfil an exemplary role in this context, we have set a further, ambitious target of achieving 33% savings on energy use across this sector, also in 2020. On 8 May this year I published the National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP) which sets out 90 actions that Government are either already taking or will [220]take in the period to 2020 to achieve our energy efficiency targets. Importantly, the NEEAP contains a list of specific actions designed to improve the energy efficiency of the public sector.

Sustainable Energy Ireland (SEI) is currently rolling out a programme which will assist the Public Sector, including local authorities, in achieving its targets, whilst demonstrating to the wider community the benefits of energy efficiency. This will be achieved through a mix of financial support, advice, assessments and training, best practice dissemination and group supports. SEI will support our public sector institutions in identifying possible energy efficient measures to be undertaken and provide guidance on drafting individual energy efficiency action plans. Central to this work will be the reporting by public sector bodies of actions taken to reduce energy usage. Given the inter-relation between the energy efficiency and climate change agendas, my Department will forge close links with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in order to minimise the administrative burden on public sector bodies.

I will soon convene a high-level Public Sector Energy Efficiency Working Group, comprising representatives of all key public sector institutions, including of course, the local authorities. This Group will oversee the implementation of the public sector energy efficiency agenda.

244. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36375/09]

Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (Deputy Eamon Ryan): There are no costs incurred by my Department in relation to leaflet design, production and delivery for my constituency office or constituency offices of the Ministers of State for the years 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009. Costs incurred in this regard are reimbursed from the One-Stop-Shop in the Houses of the Oireachtas. Full details are available from the Houses of the Oireachtas.

245. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009. [36389/09]

Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (Deputy Eamon Ryan): The expenses related to overseas travel paid by my Department to my Ministers of State and I since the establishment of the Department in June 2007 are detailed in the following table. Please note that Minister of State Lenihan was assigned to my Department on 22nd April 2009 and has not incurred expenditure in respect of foreign travel to date.

Minister	2007	2008	2009	Total
	€	€	€	€
Eamon Ryan	11,020	29,454	13,901	54,375
Tony Killeen	1,685	17,386	—	19,071
Sean Power	—	3,444	747	4,191

[221]

246. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36559/09]

Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (Deputy Eamon Ryan): In the time available it has not been possible to collate the information requested by the Deputy. The information will be provided to the Deputy as soon as possible.

247. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when a person (details supplied) in County Roscommon will receive their REPS 4 payment; the reason for the delay; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36372/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): REPS 4 is a measure under the current Rural Development Programme 2007–13 and is subject to EU Regulations which require detailed administrative checks on all applications, including plan checks, to be completed before the first 2009 payments issue. Processing of applications, including the application from the person named, has commenced to facilitate the release of payments at the earliest possible date.

248. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the costs incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of the Ministers of State at his Department for leaflet design, production, delivery and other related costs in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36373/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): There are no costs to the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in relation to Constituency office costs for leaflet design, production and delivery.

249. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the total cost of foreign travel, including flights, accommodation, food, subsistence, travel and other incidental costs, incurred by the Minister and Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009. [36387/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The information requested is being compiled and will be made available as soon as possible.

250. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the cost incurred by his constituency office and the constituency offices of Ministers of State at his Department in relation to political websites in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36528/09]

251. Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the compensation package offered to qualifying applicants for the pork recall compensation scheme, including the deciding criteria for acceptance into the scheme; the amount paid to date in 2009; the persons to whom it was paid; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36536/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The agreement concluded with pig processors in December 2008 involved making available a facility of €180 million from the public finances to assist processors in funding the recall and destruction of certain pork products from the market and product in storage. The criteria for acceptance into the Scheme are set out in the Scheme document published by my Department on 24 December 2008, a copy of which has already been provided directly to the Deputy by my office.

To date, a total of €69m has been paid to qualifying applicants under the Scheme, €35m in 2008 and €34m to date in 2009. Of this, €30m has been paid to primary processors and €39m to secondary processors. Payments are still continuing and it is not possible to provide a final list of all beneficiaries, or the total sums involved. However, a list of the applicants who have received payment to date is being supplied separately to the Deputy.

252. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the costs incurred by his constituency office, and the constituency offices of Ministers of State in his Department, in relation to the advertising of clinics, public meetings and other events and services in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36556/09]

253. Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the cost of official domestic travel including all transport costs, accommodation, meals and other incidentals incurred by himself and the Ministers of State at his Department in 2007, 2008 and to date in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36557/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The various costs requested are being assembled and the information will issue directly to the Deputy as soon as possible.

254. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the steps he proposes to take to address the issue of collapsing prices in the agri sector with particular reference to the fact that costs remain disproportionately high; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36599/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): There is no doubt that certain parts of the industry are facing significant challenges this year, although, some reduction in input prices should help to soften the impact of these difficulties. In the dairy [223]sector I have successfully pressed for action at EU level to support market prices. I continue to work with colleagues from other Member States to ensure the maximum possible support for the sector.

For the medium term outlook the European Commission forecast a gradual recovery aided by growth in global food demand due to population increase and also a longer-term decline in the growth of food-crop productivity. With this in mind work is being advanced on a new development plan for the agrifood sector for the period to 2020. It will focus on the critical issues of competitiveness, the challenges from the global economic downturn, currency fluctuations, climate change and how best to maximise the opportunities arising from a growing international food and energy crop markets.

255. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he proposes to restore the REP scheme in full; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36600/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): REPS 4 was closed to new applicants in July against the background of the situation in the public finances, the resources available to the Department and the substantial increase, over the past year, in the number of REPS participants. Almost 17,000 applications were received up to the closing date of 15 May for 2009, and further applications which were received up to the time of closure will be processed as applications for 2010. Payments due to REPS farmers for 2009 will be the highest ever and all participants already in REPS will continue to receive annual payments until their current contracts run their course.

I plan to introduce a new agri-environment scheme in 2010 which will reduce compliance costs to participants and which will provide a menu of targeted actions from which farmers may choose. Funding for the new scheme will include the additional modulation funds which I ensured will be retained for the benefit of Irish farmers in the negotiations on the CAP “Health Check”. It will also include additional matching Exchequer funding. The details of the scheme are in the process of being finalised and will require the approval of the European Commission, which has already received an outline of our proposals.

256. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the number of new markets identified for agricultural produce in the beef, lamb, pig meat and dairy sectors; the number of markets that have ceased; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36601/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Irish beef exports in recent years have been targeted at the high-value UK and Continental EU markets, with these destinations accounting for 99% of exports in 2007 and 98% in 2008. Efforts to secure alternative market outlets have continued in recent years and have seen agreements on market access reached with Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, South Africa and Indonesia but exports have remained concentrated on the EU markets.

There has been a relatively stable pattern to the destination markets for Irish sheepmeat in recent years. In both 2007 and 2008, in excess of 99% of Irish sheepmeat exports was accounted for by nine countries, namely: France, United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands. Cultural differences regarding the consumption of sheepmeat mean that opportunities to increase sales to other European countries are limited [224]while sales outside the EU are negligible. Bord Bia continues its effort to maintain and build market share in existing markets and to be in a position to develop any new opportunities that may arise in the future.

With regard to pigmeat, in addition to the other EU Member States, Ireland also exports to approximately 21 international markets including Japan, China and the U.S. Initial communications have begun with New Zealand, Australia and Vietnam with a view to gaining market access to these countries. Russia and China are currently closed to Irish pigmeat due to last December’s dioxin problem. We are continuing our efforts to regain access to these countries through the provision of information and on-going contacts.

Irish dairy products are exported to other EU Member States and to over 100 countries worldwide. The amount of exports to any particular destination varies in accordance with changes in the supply/demand dynamics in particular regions of the world and in respect of the various dairy products involved. In overall terms, Ireland’s dairy exports amounted to €2.2 billion in 2008. The UK represented the largest single share of export sales with 32%. The rest of the EU accounted for 48%, while North America and Africa accounted for 6% and 7% respectively. As international demand changes there will be an increasing emphasis on consumer food markets, particularly in the EU, US and high growth emerging economies, together with strategically expanding marketing and distribution capability worldwide. My Department will continue to work with Bord Bia and the Department of Foreign Affairs and the industry to identify and develop other potential markets.

257. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his plans for the future development of the beef, sheep, pig, lamb, cereal and dairy sectors with a view to making the necessary provision for the future of the industry, bearing in mind the competition from third countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36602/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): It is my job as Minister to plan to help the agri food sector to meet all challenges to all sectors in the coming decade. In order to do this the sector must improve competitiveness so that it can capitalise on the inevitable global recovery and meet the challenges in the coming decade. Addressing the agri food industry’s capacity to compete successfully at home and overseas has assumed a new urgency and my belief is that a new development plan for the period to 2020 is required to maintain the impetus gained from the very successful Agri-Vision 2015 strategy. Work is being advanced on this plan which is focusing on the critical issue of competitiveness, the challenges from the global economic downturn, currency fluctuations, climate change and how best to maximise the opportunities arising from a growing international food and energy crop markets. This plan will cover all of the sectors referred to by the Deputy.

258. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the discussions he has had or proposes to have with his EU colleagues with the objective of adopting a short, medium and long-term plan for the agricultural sector, bearing in mind the need to provide for security of supply, reasonable income for the producer and the need for the EU to be self-sufficient in so far as possible in the agriproduction sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36603/09]

[225]Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): According to the European Commission’s latest statistics, the EU’s overall trade in agricultural produce is fairly close to balance with its total trade of almost €153 billion in 2007, split between imports of €77.4 billion and exports of €75.1 billion. Broadly speaking, the EU is a net importer of raw products such as tropical products, certain fruit and vegetables and oils/oilseeds while it is a net exporter of more processed products such as food preparations and beverages.

European food security and agricultural production issues are dealt with through the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is constantly evolving to meet the demands of increased globalisation, including our responsibilities under the WTO, and the need to remain competitive on EU and world commodity markets. The CAP has responded to change through a series of reforms in recent decades. In the initial discussions on the shape of the CAP after 2013, I and other Ministers, have emphasised the crucial importance of ensuring the security of supply of safe, high quality food for European consumers

259. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has had discussions with his EU colleagues with a view to ensuring the future of the food production sector throughout the EU; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36604/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): There have been a number of discussions at EU Council level on the future of European food production in the context of the CAP after 2013. This issue has also been to the forefront of bilateral contacts with other Member States. My own view on the future of EU food production, which I have expressed at meetings of the Council and bilaterally to my Ministerial colleagues, is that we must maintain a strong agricultural production base in the European Union to take account of the challenges ahead in meeting increased demands for food. Any reduction in food production in the EU would be taken up elsewhere where less efficient production systems exist and would result, inter alia, in a heavier carbon footprint. The EU must also undertake food production and distribution in a manner that is sustainable in all its dimensions — economically, socially and environmentally.

There will be major challenges ahead from climate change, increased competition on world and EU markets, the international recession and other factors. We must ensure that we have the capacity to cope with the challenges and fully exploit the opportunities as they emerge. To do so our whole sector, from farm to fork, must be highly efficient and competitive. It must also be innovative, producing the products that changing consumer tastes demand, and it must be relentlessly focused on quality and safety. To achieve these objectives, there is a continuing need for an active and appropriately resourced European agricultural policy. That policy needs to recognise the role that a cohesive agriculture and rural development policy can play in addressing future energy needs, addressing environmental concerns and providing a secure and sustainable food supply in Europe.

260. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the countries within the EU currently involved in sugar production from sugar beet; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36605/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): The 2006-2009 scheme for the restructuring of the European sugar industry, which was implemented as part of the reform of the EU sugar regime, resulted in the EU sugar quota being reduced by 5.2 [226]million tonnes to 13.3 million tonnes. EU sugar production is now concentrated in 18 Member States (as opposed to 23 before the reform) which enjoy favourable agronomic conditions. They are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. Over 75% of production is accounted for by 7 of these Member States, namely (in order of size of quota) France, Germany, Poland, UK, Netherlands, Belgium and Italy.

261. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his plans to ensure a reasonable standard of income throughout the agricultural production sector with particular reference to the future needs in terms of food production here and throughout the EU; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36606/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): Agricultural production in Ireland and the EU and farm income must be viewed in the context of a reformed and evolving Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which has placed much more emphasis on market orientation and competitiveness. Following the decoupling of direct payments from production, farmers can now take advantage of the freedom to farm for the market, allowing them to focus on meeting the requirements of the consumer in a competitive manner.

In the context of discussions on the future of the CAP after 2013, I have repeatedly said that the EU must maintain a strong agricultural production base in the European Union to take account of the challenges ahead in meeting increased demands for food. The EU must also undertake food production and distribution in a manner that is sustainable in all its dimensions — economically, socially and environmentally. There will be major challenges ahead from climate change, increased competition on world and EU markets, the financial crunch and other factors. We must ensure that we have the capacity to cope with the challenges and fully exploit the opportunities as they emerge. To do so our whole sector, from farm to fork, must be highly efficient and competitive

262. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the extent to which the costs to the dairy producer here compare with those in the UK, France and other EU countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36607/09]

264. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the extent to which milk prices to the dairy producer here compare with those in the UK, France and other EU countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36609/09]

Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Deputy Brendan Smith): I propose to take Questions Nos. 262 and 264 together.

Analysis of Irish dairy farming shows a wide variation in performance efficiencies between high and low cost producers. There is a difference of approximately 56% in the cost base between those with the lowest production cost and those with the highest, amounting to 9c/litre. Production costs vary across the EU, but Ireland has an advantage compared to other Member States through our largely grass based systems of production.

Dairy farmers incomes are comprised of the market price paid for milk and direct income support from the EU. Market forces have a major influence on the price paid to farmers for milk. World market prices determine the returns received by dairy processors and these in turn [227]are reflected in the price paid to farmers. In essence, farm gate prices normally reflect the returns from international markets of dairy product sales. Ireland’s peripheral geographic location and highly seasonal grass based production curve has resulted in a dairy production profile heavily based on storable product. Those commodity products, such as butter and milk powders, are low margin products and this is reflected in the milk price.

The following table below shows the milk prices per 100kg for the EU27 member states for August of 2009.

EU Country	Milk Price August 2009
	€/100kgs
Cyprus	50.58
Finland	38.11
Greece	36.60
Italy	31.50
France	29.95
Portugal	27.94
Spain	27.18
Netherlands	27.02
United Kingdom	26.07
EU 27	25.77
Austria	25.32
Sweden	25.08
Denmark	24.49
Bulgaria	24.43
Slovenia	24.08
Luxembourg	23.98
Poland	22.45
Czech Republic	22.42
Germany	22.18
Ireland	22.04
Belgium	21.59
Hungary	20.50
Slovakia</