Stanford, William BedellTuesday, 20 December 1966 |
Seanad Eireann Debate
Page of 7
|
Appropriation Bill, 1966 ( Certified Money Bill ): Second Stage (Resumed) and Subsequent Stages.
The remarks of the representatives from the universities in this debate have necessarily been handicapped by the delay in the appearance of the report of the Commission on Higher Education. I hope th...
Yes, but he is bringing into the country currency from outside to the value of £350. Surely that is what the tourist trade is doing. They are trying to bring in money from outside. The citizens of D...
I should have to think that out. The Minister will have an opportunity to refute what I am saying later on. As I see it, if the money we spend on the various——
Should I, indeed? Let me continue for a little while anyway. As I see it, there is something like £400 per student coming into the city of Dublin. That might be an argument for putting more of the c...
It would not be popular. But the expenditure is not a total loss in any sense.
May I add just one sentence? Many of the people I have met abroad wanted to come back but there simply are not the inducements for their doing so. I should like to comment on what the Minister said ...
As the Chair suggests, I shall pass to another point. The rest of my remarks will be based on three exhibits. Here I have two pubcations—there is no need for alarm; they are neither censored nor cens...
No, not Cromwell, curiously enough, but through historical prejudice, political confusion, religious hostilities, these great buildings now lie in ruins.
Partly. These are the very factors which are operating to pull down our Georgian buildings today. I ask the Seanad to consider that perhaps 200 or 300 years from now, historians may say that in the...
On a point of order, Sir, is this official Labour Party policy?
Appropriation Bill, 1966 (Certified Money Bill): Second Stage (Resumed).
Only a quarter of an hour.
| Last Updated: 15/09/2010 10:24:12 |
Page of 7
|