Ahern, MichaelThursday, 28 September 2006 |
Seanad Eireann Debate
Page of 8
|
Investment Funds, Companies and Miscellaneous Provisions Bill 2006: Committee and Remaining Stages
With regard to amendment No. 1, my officials have consulted with the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel and on his advice I do not intend to accept the amendment. His advice is that there is no need...
It is the same answer.
Amendment No. 2 seeks to insert a comma after the word “securities”.
My officials have consulted with the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel and on his advice I do not intend to accept the amendment.
We are happy that the text as it stands means what we want it to mean. We sought the advice of the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel on foot of the Senator’s amendment to see whether it actually me...
Like the Senator I am advised that it is correct in the original text. It is not an issue on which we will have a falling out.
He is happy that the current text is correct and I will accept the current situation.
This is a technical amendment, the purpose of which is to clarify that the directive referred to in line 13 is the transparency regulated markets directive. Two directives were mentioned in the origi...
I thank Senators for their valuable contributions. We had a useful debate on Second Stage in July. This is technical legislation covering a number of different areas of company and consumer law. I ...
I wish to express my appreciation for the co-operation of Senator Coghlan in this process.
| Last Updated: 07/09/2010 16:51:10 |
Page of 8
|